Impact of cost on prescribing diabetes medications for older adults with type 2 diabetes in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Newer diabetes medications have cardiorenal benefits beyond blood sugar lowering that make them a preferred treatment option in many patients. Despite this, studies have shown that prescribing of these medications remains suboptimal with medication costs being hypothesized as a reason for underutilization. OBJECTIVE: To understand clinicians' decision-making processes for prescribing diabetes medications in older adults, focusing on higher cost medications. METHODS: Observations of patient encounters and semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians from primary care, endocrinology, and geriatrics to elucidate themes into diabetes medication prescribing. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze the data from interviews using an inductive coding scheme with themes derived from the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one interviews were conducted. Five themes were identified: 1) out-of-pocket costs drive prescribing decisions 2) out-of-pocket costs can be variable due to changing insurance plans or changing coverage 3) clinicians have difficulty with determining patient-specific out-of-pocket costs 4) clinicians manage the tradeoffs existing between cost, efficacy, and safety and 5) clinicians can use cost-modifying strategies such as patient assistance. CONCLUSION: Addressing the challenges that medication costs pose to prescribing evidence-based medications for type 2 diabetes is necessary to optimize diabetes care for older adults.

Associations of Healthcare Utilization and Costs with Increasing Pain and Treatment Intensity Levels in Osteoarthritis Patients: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex disease, and prior studies have documented the health and economic burdens of patients with OA compared to those without OA. Our goal was to use two strategies to further stratify OA patients based on both pain and treatment intensity to examine healthcare utilization and costs using electronic records from 2001 to 2018 at a large integrated health system. METHODS: Adult patients with ≥1 pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and diagnosis of OA were included. Pain episodes of ≥90 days were defined as mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10) based on initial NRS. Patients were initially classified as mild and moved to moderate-severe OA if any of eight treatment-based criteria were met. Outpatient visits (OP), emergency department visits (ED), inpatient days, and healthcare costs (both all-cause and OA-specific) were compared among pain levels and OA severity levels as frequencies and per-member-per-year rates, using generalized linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index, with contrasts of p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: We identified 127,656 patients, 92,576 with pain scores. Moderate and severe pain were associated with significantly higher rates of OA-related utilization and costs, and all-cause ED visits and pharmacy costs. Moderate-severe OA patients had significantly higher OA-related utilization and costs, and all-cause OP, ED and pharmacy costs. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and treatment intensity were both strongly associated with OA-related utilization but not consistently with all-cause utilization. Our results provide promising evidence of better criteria and approaches for predicting disease burden and costs in the future.

A mixed methods evaluation of the implementation of pharmacy services within a team-based at-home care program.

BACKGROUND: Sub-optimal medication use results in significant avoidable morbidity, mortality, and costs. Programs, such as comprehensive medication management (CMM), can help to optimize medication use, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. However, implementing programs like CMM can be challenging and differences in how CMM has been implemented may be responsible for observed heterogeneity in the outcomes associated with CMM. OBJECTIVE(S): Describe the implementation strategies utilized in implementing CMM telephonically within a team-based at-home care program and evaluate the implementation process. METHODS: The implementation of CMM was facilitated using various implementation strategies including: develop educational material and conduct training, change record system, audit and feedback, learning collaborative, quality monitoring, readiness assessment, and implementation team formation. The impact of these strategies as well as pharmacist and team member perspectives on the implementation of CMM were examined using mixed methods and guided by Proctor's conceptual model for implementation. RESULTS: The pharmacists felt that most of the implementation strategies used to facilitate consistent delivery of CMM were useful, but were unable to successfully implement all of them. Despite this, significant increases in fidelity to steps of the patient care process was achieved. The pharmacists felt that CMM was acceptable, appropriate for patient population, and feasible, but barriers (e.g., the telephonic and remote nature of the practice, the evolving nature of the program, and the difficulty in coordinating care between the patients primary care team and the care team affiliated with the program) affected the feasibility and organizational fit of CMM within this team-based, at-home care program. General pharmacy services, however, were seen as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. CONCLUSION: Deliberately designing and utilizing a variety of implementation strategies can facilitate the implementation of CMM and significantly increase fidelity to the patient care process. To improve feasibility and organizational fit of CMM, additional barriers and challenges need to be addressed.

Reductions in 30-day readmission, mortality, and costs with inpatient-to-community pharmacist follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of pharmacist-provided continuous care and electronic communication on readmissions among a group of high-risk patients. DESIGN: Pragmatic interventional study with 5:1 matched control. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients discharged from any of 4 hospitals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or diabetes within Pennsylvania. Patients in the intervention group received consultative services from inpatient pharmacists before discharge and inpatient-to-community pharmacist communication of hospitalization information facilitated with the use of a secure messaging system. After discharge, patients received up to 5 in-person or telephonic medication management consultations with their community pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The principal end point was 30-day readmission. Secondary end points included time to event (readmission, emergency department [ED] visit, death, or composite of hospitalization, ED, or death) over 90 days after discharge. Financial feasibility and sustainability were also assessed with the use of a return-on-investment (ROI) model based on information within the subset of patients with health plan coverage. RESULTS: Among patients who received inpatient intervention plus consultation with community pharmacists compared with matched control patients, we observed a lower 30-day readmission rate (9% vs. 15%, respectively; P = 0.02), 30-day all-cause mortality (2% vs. 5%; P = 0.04), and composite 30-day end point of readmission, ED visit, or death (22% vs. 28%; P = 0.09). Differences between the groups diminished and no longer maintained statistical significance at 90 days. An estimated average ROI of 8.1 was also observed among the subset with health plan information (worst base case range 1.9-16.3). CONCLUSION: Connecting community pharmacists to inpatient pharmacists during the transitional hospital-to-home time frame is feasible and resulted in lower 30-day readmissions and significant ROI, that is, significant impact on health care utilization and total health care costs. Results of this study have broad implications for improving the care of high-risk patients moving from hospital to home, most notably in the engagement of community pharmacists after discharge to assure medication use and follow-up to reduce readmissions and total costs of care.

Impact of a pharmacist-led diabetes management on outcomes, utilization, and cost.

PURPOSE: Pharmacist-led medication therapy disease management (MTDM) has shown improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with certain chronic diseases. However, only limited data demonstrating the impact on health care utilization and cost of care are available. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led MTDM program on clinical surrogate outcomes, care utilization, and cost of care among patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by utilizing electronic health records and insurance claims data. Patients were identified between February 2011 and December 2014. Data were collected from Geisinger, a large integrated health care system located in Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey. A total of 5,500 patients with diabetes mellitus were identified; 2,750 were enrolled in MTDM and were 1-to-1 propensity score-matched to a comparison cohort not enrolled in a pharmacist-led MTDM program. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in composite HbA1c, blood pressure, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment at 12 months (12% vs 12%, P=0.53). HbA1c goal was reached more frequently among patients without MTDM compared to those at 12 months (57% vs 51%, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the attainment of blood pressure or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals at 12 months. MTDM was associated with reduced all-cause hospitalization rate (-19.6%; P=0.02) as well as increased primary care physician visits (18.5%; P<0.001) and lower average per-member-per-month medical cost (-13%, P=0.027). CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of impact on the clinical surrogate outcomes, MTDM was associated with lower cost of care and fewer hospitalizations, possibly facilitated by increased monitoring (ie, higher primary care utilization).

Medication therapy disease management: Geisinger's approach to population health management.

PURPOSE: Pharmacists' involvement in a population health initiative focused on chronic disease management is described. SUMMARY: Geisinger Health System has cultivated a culture of innovation in population health management, as highlighted by its ambulatory care pharmacy program, the Medication Therapy Disease Management (MTDM) program. Initiated in 1996, the MTDM program leverages pharmacists' pharmacotherapy expertise to optimize care and improve outcomes. MTDM program pharmacists are trained and credentialed to manage over 16 conditions, including atrial fibrillation (AF) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Over a 15-year period, Geisinger Health Plan (GHP)-insured patients with AF whose warfarin therapy was managed by the MTDM program had, on average, 18% fewer emergency department (ED) visits and 18% fewer hospitalizations per year than GHP enrollees with AF who did not receive MTDM services, with 23% lower annual total care costs. Over a 2-year period, GHP-insured patients with MS whose pharmacotherapy was managed by pharmacists averaged 28% fewer annual ED visits than non-pharmacist-managed patients; however, the mean annual total care cost was 21% higher among MTDM clinic patients. CONCLUSION: The Geisinger MTDM program has evolved over 20 years from a single pharmacist-run anticoagulation clinic into a large program focused on managing the health of an ever-growing population. Initial challenges in integrating pharmacists into the Geisinger patient care framework as clinical experts were overcome by demonstrating the MTDM program's positive impact on patient outcomes.

Patient characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns associated with unused medications among medicare patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine what patient characteristics and healthcare utilization patterns are associated with the likelihood of having unused medications among elderly Medicare patients. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis combining insurance claims and phone survey data of Medicare Advantage members. SETTING: Regional health plan in Central Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: 528 Medicare Advantage members (age 65 and older), who had Medicare Part D coverage through Geisinger Health Plan as of December 31, 2013, and completed the phone survey in May of 2014. MAIN OUTCOME: Member survey response indicating whether or not the member had any unused medication at the time of the survey. RESULTS: 27% of the patients in the sample (142 out of 528) indicated having one or more unused medications. In a bivariate analysis, these patients had higher prevalence of chronic conditions, utilized more medical care (more emergency department visits and physician office visits), and incurred higher cost of care. In a multivariate analysis, patients who received medications with days' supply greater than 30 (odds ratio (OR) = 1.59; p = 0.03) and utilized more acute care (defined as inpatient admissions or emergency department visits) (OR = 4.2; p = 0.04) were more likely to have unused medications. Moreover, patients who were advised by health care professionals about proper medication disposal were less likely to have unused medications (OR = 0.52; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest potential ways to develop effective strategies to reduce amounts of unused medications. Such strategies are likely to involve limiting quantities of medications dispensed at each fill, and patient education on proper disposal of unused medications, particularly during care transitions.