Politics and health care spending in the United States: A case study from the passage of the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act.

This paper analyzes the interplay between congressional politics, the actions of the executive branch, and hospitals' regulated Medicare payments. We focus on the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) and analyze a provision in the law - Section 508 - that raised certain hospitals' regulated payments. We show, via our analysis of the Section 508 program, that Medicare payments are malleable and can be influenced by political dynamics. In the cross-section, hospitals represented by members of Congress who voted "yea" on the MMA were more likely to receive Section 508 payment increases. We interviewed the Secretary of Health and Human Services who oversaw the MMA, and he described how these payment increases were designed to win support for the law. The Section 508 payment increases raised hospitals' activity and spending. Members of Congress representing recipient hospitals received increased campaign contributions after the Section 508 payment increases were extended. Ultimately, our analysis highlights how Medicare payment increases can serve as an appealing tool for legislative leaders working to win votes for wider pieces of legislation.

Racial Differences in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Survival in Younger and Older Patients.

INTRODUCTION: African Americans (AAs) compared with European Americans (EAs) have poorer stage-specific survival from colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent reports have indicated that the racial difference in survival has worsened over time, especially among younger patients. To better characterize this association, we used population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data to evaluate the effect of race on stage IV CRC survival in patients aged < 50 and ≥ 50 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The population included 16,782 patients diagnosed with stage IV colon and rectal adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2011. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between race and other prognostic factors and the risk of death in each age group. RESULTS: Younger AAs compared with EAs had a greater prevalence of proximal CRC at diagnosis, a factor associated with a significantly greater risk of death in both races. Among patients < 50 years old, AAs had a greater risk of death compared with EAs (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.51), which was attenuated in patients ≥ 50 years of age (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.16); P for interaction = .01. CONCLUSION: The results revealed poor overall survival for AAs compared with EAs, especially for those < 50 years of age. The greater prevalence of proximal CRC at diagnosis among younger AAs (vs. EAs) might contribute to the racial difference in survival. Future studies are needed to understand how the colonic location affects the efficacy of treatment regimens.