Opioid e-prescribing trends at discharge in a large pediatric health system.

OBJECTIVE: Legitimate opioid prescriptions have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse in pediatric patients. In 2014, Pennsylvania legislation expanded a prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) to curb inappropriate controlled substance prescriptions. The authors' objective was to describe recent opioid prescribing trends at a large, pediatric health system situated in a region with one of the highest opioid-related death rates in the United States and examine the impact of the PDMP on prescribing trends. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental assessment of trends of opioid e-prescriptions, from 2012 to 2017. Multivariable Poisson segmented regression examined the effect of the PDMP. Period prevalence comparison of opioid e-prescriptions across the care continuum in 2016. RESULTS: There were 62,661 opioid e-prescriptions identified during the study period. Combination opioid/non-opioid prescriptions decreased, while oxycodone prescriptions increased. Seasonal variation was evident. Of 110,884 inpatient encounters, multivariable regression demonstrated lower odds of an opioid being prescribed at discharge per month of the study period (p < 0.001) and a significant interaction between passage of the PDMP legislation and time (p = 0.03). Black patients had lower odds of receiving an opioid at discharge compared to white patients. Inpatients had significantly greater odds of receiving an opioid compared to emergency department (Prevalence Odds Ratio 7.1 [95% confidence interval: 6.9-7.3]; p < 0.001) and outpatient (398.9 [355.5-447.5]; p < 0.001) encounters. CONCLUSION: In a large pediatric health system, oxycodone has emerged as the most commonly prescribed opioid in recent years. Early evidence indicates that a state-run drug monitoring program is associated with reduced opioid prescribing. Additional study is necessary to examine the relationship between opioid prescriptions and race.

Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale.

The Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale (IPES) is an accurate, acceptable, and quick tool that assesses the impact of epilepsy on the child with epilepsy and his or her family. The aim of this study was to investigate its applicability in China. After multistage translation and cultural adaptation, the final Chinese version was administered to 110 parents of children with epilepsy to evaluate its validity, reliability, and sensitivity. All items contributed significantly to the summary measure. With respect to validity, all items were substantially correlated with the criterion questionnaire subscales, and principal component analysis indicated that three factors accounted for 72% of the variance of the scale. The internal consistency coefficients of the first and second tests for the total were 0.916 and 0.930, respectively, and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.891 to 0.992. Additionally, the IPES can detect differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between subjects according to epilepsy severity. In conclusion, this study indicates that the Chinese IPES has good validity, reliability, and sensitivity, and is an epilepsy-specific HRQOL questionnaire that is a brief, accurate, and valid assessment of the influence of epilepsy on the child and family.