Variation in Family Involvement on Rounds Between English-Speaking and Spanish-Speaking Families.

BACKGROUND: Family-centered rounds (FCR) is the standard of care in inpatient pediatrics. Results of studies have revealed that Spanish-speaking families can experience communication challenges and decreased empowerment on rounds. In our study, we aim to identify variation in FCR practices for Spanish-speaking compared to English-speaking families and factors contributing to these disparities. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study performed by secondary analysis of a quality improvement initiative conducted at a quaternary children's hospital. Data were collected from June 2019 to March 2020 by using observational audits. Encounters were analyzed to compare key elements of FCR (including rounds location, elicitation of family questions, involvement in discharge planning) for English-speaking and Spanish-speaking families. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare family involvement in FCR. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: Rounding encounters included 394 families (261 English-speaking and 133 Spanish-speaking). Fewer Spanish-speaking families were included in the medical team's discussion on rounds (64.7% vs 76.3%, P = .017), were asked about questions at the start of rounds (44.4% vs 56.3%, P = .025), or were involved in discussion of discharge criteria (72.2% vs 82.8%, P = .018) when compared to English-speaking families. These differences were magnified for resident teams rounding with subspecialists. The finding of decreased family involvement in the discussion on rounds persisted after adjusting for patient age and team type. CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking families were less likely to be involved in FCR compared to English-speaking families. Further investigation is needed to explore the root causes of this practice variation and to develop interventions to address disparities.

Reducing Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections via Cost-saving Diagnostic Stewardship.

We conducted a quality improvement project at our large, public, tertiary-care, academic hospital to reduce the standardized infection ratio (SIR) of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Our diagnostic stewardship program, based on education and audit and feedback, significantly reduced inpatient urine culture orders and CAUTI SIR.

Targeted Needs Assessment of Treatment Planning Education for United States Radiation Oncology Residents.

PURPOSE: Prior surveys suggest almost one-third of chief residents report insufficient exposure to treatment planning. We evaluated the state of treatment planning education among United States residents. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A web-based survey was sent to current residents identified using the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology directory. RESULTS: The response rate was 33%. Twenty-six percent of residents reported a mandatory treatment planning rotation. Seventy-one percent of residents reported reviewing ≤50% of plans with an attending. Twenty-three percent of respondents were not at all or only slightly comfortable (1 or 2 on a 1-5 scale) evaluating treatment plans. Residents with mandatory treatment planning rotations were more comfortable evaluating plans compared with those without mandatory rotations (P = .045). Overall, 60% reported insufficient exposure to treatment planning. Among postgraduate year 5 residents, this rate was 52%. Ninety-two percent of residents expressed interest in free supplemental treatment planning resources. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of residents surveyed report insufficient exposure to treatment planning. Development of a practical treatment planning curriculum would offer the opportunity to improve resident education, and ultimately quality of care, at the national level.

Diagnosis, Staging, Radiation Treatment Response Assessment, and Outcome Prognostication of Head and Neck Cancers Using PET Imaging: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review summarizes the current applications of 18F-FDG PET imaging in the diagnosis, staging, radiation treatment response assessment, and outcome prognostication of head and neck cancers. For head and neck cancers of unknown primary origin, 18F-FDG PET/CT increases the likelihood of identifying the primary tumor and establishing the diagnosis. 18F-FDG PET/CT is important in the accurate staging of locoregionally advanced cases of HNSCC, which can greatly affect recommendations for treatment. Following definitive chemoradiation, 18F-FDG PET/CT is validated as a means of treatment response assessment. Emerging PET tracers of hypoxia and their potential applications are reviewed.

Reducing Clostridium difficile Colitis Rates Via Cost-Saving Diagnostic Stewardship.

We conducted a quality improvement project at a large public tertiary-care academic hospital to reduce reported hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates. We introduced diagnostic stewardship and provider education, resulting in a 2-fold reduction in C. difficile nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) orders and markedly lower hospital CDI rate.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:734-736.

Managing One's Symptoms: A Qualitative Study of Low-Income African Americans With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: African Americans endure disproportionately high advanced cancer rates and also are disproportionately represented in the lower socioeconomic strata. These individuals work to manage symptoms in order to function and have a satisfactory quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to discover what low-income African American adults with advanced cancer do on a day-to-day basis to relieve and manage symptoms. This study viewed the individuals as experts and asked them not what they are told to do, but rather what they actually do. METHODS: A purposive sample of 27 individuals participated in semistructured interviews conducted by 2 research interviewers. This qualitative descriptive approach used content analysis to develop themes to describe symptom self-management. RESULTS: Participants described 2 approaches: making continual adjustments and finding stability through spirituality. In seeking comfort from the distress of their symptoms, they were constantly altering their activities and fine-tuning strategies. They adjusted medical regimens and changed the speed and selection of daily activities, including comfort measures and diet modifications. In contrast, their spirituality was a consistent presence in their lives that provided balance to their unstable symptom experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that people with advanced cancer actively engage in multiple complex self-management strategies in response to symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As providers assess how individuals manage their symptoms, they must find ways to support those efforts. Providers then will recognize the challenges faced by advanced cancer patients in obtaining the best quality of life while managing multiple symptoms, activities, and family responsibilities.

Cultural humility: essential foundation for clinical researchers.

Cultural humility is a process of self-reflection and discovery in order to build honest and trustworthy relationships. It offers promise for researchers to understand and eliminate health disparities, a continual and disturbing problem necessitating attention and action on many levels. This paper presents a discussion of the process of cultural humility and its important role in research to better understand the perspectives and context of the researcher and the research participant. We discern cultural humility from similar concepts, specifically cultural competence and reflexivity. We will also explore ways to cultivate cultural humility in the context of human subjects research. Mindfulness is one approach that can be helpful in enhancing awareness of self and others in this process. With a foundation in cultural humility, nurse researchers and other investigators can implement meaningful and ethical projects to better address health disparities.

Dispensing pattern of generic and brand-name drugs in children.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the dispensing patterns of generic and brand-name drugs in children and to identify patient sociodemographic characteristics associated with generic drug use. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2002 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. This survey is conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and consists of a nationally representative sample of civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The 2002 survey included 14 828 families and 37 418 individuals, 11 099 of whom were children 0 to 17 years of age. Our unit of analysis was individual prescription drugs dispensed to children 0 to 17 years of age. The main dependent variable for the logistic model was the use of generic drugs. Independent variables included age, gender, race, insurance type, family income, Metropolitan Statistical Area status, and health status. RESULTS: Generic drugs were filled in 40.6% of the 24 465 prescriptions analyzed. Average expenditure for generic drugs was $20.92 (SD 24.53) per prescription versus $71.65 (SD $170.22) for brand-name drugs. Use of generic versus brand-name drugs varied by conditions and medication class. Uninsured patients were more likely than privately insured patients to have a generic drug dispensed than brand-name drugs (odds ratio [OR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.84). Asian children were more likely than white children to receive generic drugs (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.07-2.57). Girls were also more likely than boys to receive generic drugs over brand-name drugs (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.73). CONCLUSIONS: Generic drugs were dispensed more often to uninsured children, Asian children, and girls.

Activities of daily living in women with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To detail the daily activities of women with advanced breast cancer. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative. SETTING: Six clinical sites in New England. Of the six sites, three were urban, one was suburban, and two were rural, with three sites being comprehensive cancer centers. SAMPLE: 84 women with a confirmed diagnosis of stage IV breast cancer with a life expectancy of four months or more. METHODS: A secondary analysis of an expressive writing intervention study control group. As part of the control writing group, participants kept handwritten activity logs for four consecutive days. Standard content analysis procedures were used to analyze the transcribed activity logs. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Activities of daily living in women with advanced breast cancer. FINDINGS: 22 codes were identified that depicted the daily activities of participants. Subsequent analysis merged the 22 codes into six themes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated that patients with advanced breast cancer are living very full, active lives despite numerous symptoms and cancer treatments. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The study serves as a foundation for the development of interventions to enhance daily functioning. Oncology nurses should counsel women with advanced cancer regarding pacing and self-care activities.

A needs assessment of oncology nurses' perceptions of National Cancer Institute-supported clinical trial networks.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe oncology nurses' understandings of the function and infrastructure of, current level of participation in, and advantages and disadvantages to conducting research through cancer cooperative groups (CCGs). DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Cross-sectional, Web-based needs assessment. SAMPLE: Doctorally prepared Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members (n = 962), ONS Clinical Trial Nurses Special Interest Group members (n = 568), and a random sample of master's-prepared ONS members (n = 2,000) for a total of 3,530 ONS members. METHODS: A 28-item questionnaire was distributed via e-mail. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Familiarity with different cooperative groups, understanding about their functions and infrastructures, and perceived advantages and disadvantages of and barriers to conducting research through cooperative groups. FINDINGS: Fifty-four percent of respondents reported being very familiar with cooperative groups, and 19% reported having no knowledge about their functions and infrastructures. Attending meetings and enrolling patients were the most frequently cited activities. Limited funding and time, lack of opportunities, perception that CCGs are too political, and lack of receptivity for nursing research were identified as barriers to conducting research within cooperative groups. CONCLUSIONS: ONS members' self-described roles correlated to their participation in CCGs. Of respondents who had the education and qualifications with which to lead clinical trials as principal investigators, few reported successful collaborations with conducting research through CCGs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Although respondents reported more advantages than disadvantages to conducting research through CCGs, they did not report a high level of involvement, such as taking the lead in conducting research. Respondents expressed interest in learning more about conducting research within cooperative groups.

Expressive disclosure and health outcomes in a prostate cancer population.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study explored the feasibility and the efficacy of a brief, well-defined psychosocial intervention (expressive disclosure) in improving behavioral, medical, immunological, and emotional health outcomes in men with diagnosed prostate cancer. METHOD: Thirty prostate cancer patients receiving outpatient oncology care were randomized into experimental (disclosure) and control (non-disclosure) groups. All had been previously treated by surgery or radiation within the last 4 years and were being monitored without further intervention for change in PSA levels. Psychological and physical health surveys were administered and peripheral blood for PSA levels and immune assays was obtained upon study enrollment and again at 3 and 6 months post enrollment. Multivariate analyses were used to examine how the expressive disclosure impacted the hypothesized domains of functioning: physical and psychological symptoms; health care utilization; and immunocompetence. RESULTS: Compared to controls, patients in the expressive disclosure condition showed improvements in the domains of physical symptoms and health care utilization, but not in psychological variables nor in disease relevant aspects of immunocompetence. CONCLUSIONS: Study results support the feasibility of an expressive disclosure intervention for men with prostate cancer. The intervention was well accepted by this population, and participation/adherence was quite high. Results provide only limited support for the hypothesis that a written emotional disclosure task can positively impact health outcomes in a cancer population. However, this pilot study may have lacked adequate power to detect possible intervention benefits. Further studies with larger samples are needed to better assess the intervention's impact on psychological well-being and immunocompetence.