Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 9(16): 1105-1115, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112181

RESUMO

Aim: This real-world data study investigated the economic burden and associated factors of readmissions for cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) post-cranial, transsphenoidal, or spinal index surgeries. Methods: Costs of CSFL readmissions and index hospitalizations during 2014-2018 were collected. Readmission cost was measured as absolute cost and as percentage of index hospitalization cost. Factors associated with readmission cost were explored using generalized linear models. Results: Readmission cost averaged US$2407-6106, 35-94% of index hospitalization cost. Pharmacy costs were the leading contributor. Generalized linear models showed transsphenoidal index surgery and surgical treatment for CSFL were associated with higher readmission costs. Conclusion: CSFL readmissions are a significant economic burden in China. Factors associated with higher readmission cost should be monitored.


Assuntos
Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/etiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/epidemiologia , Vazamento de Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/terapia , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 8(5): 317-326, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30681001

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the clinical and economic impact of flowable gelatin hemostatic matrix (FGHM) in anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). PATIENTS & METHODS: A total of 451 patients with performed ACSS were included to compare FGHM with conventional hemostatic methods for clinical and cost outcomes using propensity score matching method. RESULTS: The comparisons of the matched 125 pairs observed that FGHM was associated with significantly lower blood transfusion volume (11.2 vs 36.3 ml; p = 0.039), shorter postsurgery hospital stay length (3.7 vs 4.7 days; p = 0.002), shorter operation time (103.5 vs 117.7 min; p = 0.004), lower drainage placement rate (51.2 vs 89.6%; p < 0.001) and also lower total hospital costs (median ¥64,717 vs ¥65,064; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Use of FGHM in ACSS improved perioperative outcomes without increasing hospital costs.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Discotomia/métodos , Gelatina/uso terapêutico , Hemostáticos/uso terapêutico , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Gelatina/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Duração da Cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA