Hemodynamic assessment for intracranial atherosclerosis from angiographic images: a clinical validation study.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke. Conventional anatomical analysis by CT angiography, MRI, or digital subtraction angiography can provide valuable information on the anatomical changes of stenosis; however, they are not sufficient to accurately evaluate the hemodynamic severity of ICAS. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the pressure ratio across intracranial stenoses (termed as fractional flow (FF)) derived from cerebral angiography for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant ICAS defined by pressure wire-derived FF. METHODS: This retrospective study represents a feasible and reliable method for calculating the FF from cerebral angiography (AccuFFicas). Patients (n=121) who had undergone wire-based measurement of FF and cerebral angiography were recruited. The accuracy of the computed pressure ratio was evaluated using wire-based FF as the reference standard. RESULTS: The mean value of wire-based FF was 0.78±0.19, while the computed AccuFFicas had an average value of 0.79±0.18. Good correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient r=0.92, P<0.001) between AccuFFicas and FF was observed. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between AccuFFicas and FF was -0.01±0.07, indicating good agreement. The area under the curve (AUC) of AccuFFicas in predicting FF≤0.70, FF≤0.75, and FF≤0.80 was 0.984, 0.986, and 0.962, respectively. CONCLUSION: Angiography-based FF computed from cerebral angiographic images could be an effective computational tool for evaluating the hemodynamic significance of ICAS.

Diagnostic accuracy of a novel optical coherence tomography-based fractional flow reserve algorithm for assessment of coronary stenosis significance.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to introduce a novel optical coherence tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) computational approach and assess the diagnostic performance of the algorithm for assessing physiological function. METHODS: The fusion of coronary optical coherence tomography and angiography was used to generate a novel FFR algorithm (AccuFFRoct) to evaluate functional ischemia of coronary stenosis. In the current study, a total of 34 consecutive patients were included, and AccuFFRoct was used to calculate the FFR for these patients. With the wire-measured FFR as the reference standard, we evaluated the performance of our approach by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Per vessel accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for AccuFFRoct in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis were 93.8%, 94.7%, 92.3%, 94.7%, and 92.3%, respectively, were found. Good correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.80, p < 0.001) between AccuFFRoct and FFR was observed. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference value of -0.037 (limits of agreement: -0.189 to 0.115). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of AccuFFRoct in identifying physiologically significant stenosis was 0.94, which was higher than the minimum lumen area (MLA, AUC = 0.91) and significantly higher than the diameter stenosis (%DS, AUC = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study shows the efficiency and accuracy of AccuFFRoct for clinical implementation when using invasive FFR measurement as a reference. It could provide important insights into coronary imaging superior to current methods based on the degree of coronary artery stenosis.

Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (AccuIMR) for the assessment of microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome.

Background: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of AccuIMR, a newly proposed, pressure wire-free index, in identifying coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) among patients with acute coronary syndrome [including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Methods: A total of 163 consecutive patients (43 with STEMI, 59 with NSTEMI, and 61 with CCS), who underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and for whom the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was measured, were retrospectively enrolled at a single center. IMR measurements were made in 232 vessels. The AccuIMR based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was calculated from coronary angiography. The diagnostic performance of AccuIMR was assessed using wire-based IMR as a reference standard. Results: AccuIMR correlated well with IMR (overall r=0.76, P<0.001; STEMI r=0.78, P<0.001; NSTEMI r=0.78, P<0.001; CCS r=0.75, P<0.001) and had good diagnostic performance in detecting abnormal IMR [overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 94.83% (91.14% to 97.30%), 92.11% (78.62% to 98.34%), and 95.36% (91.38% to 97.86%), respectively]. Using a cutoff value of IMR >40 U for AccuIMR in STEMI and IMR >25 U in NSTEMI and CCS, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of AccuIMR for predicting abnormal IMR value was 0.917 (0.874 to 0.949) in all patients, 1.000 (0.937 to 1.000) in patients with STEMI, 0.941 (0.867 to 0.980) in patients with NSTEMI, and 0.918 (0.841 to 0.966) in patients with CCS. Conclusions: The use of AccuIMR in the evaluation of microvascular diseases could provide valuable information and potentially increase the application of physiological assessment for microcirculation in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound-derived virtual fractional flow reserve (FFR) and FFR derived from computed tomography for functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and intravascular ultrasound-derived fractional flow reserve (IVUS-FFR) are two functional assessment methods for coronary stenoses. However, the calculation algorithms for these methods differ significantly. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. METHODS: Six hundred and seventy patients (698 lesions) with known or suspected coronary artery disease were screened for this retrospective analysis between January 2020 and July 2021. A total of 40 patients (41 lesions) underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and FFR evaluations within six months after completing coronary CT angiography were included. Two novel CFD-based models (AccuFFRct and AccuFFRivus) were used to compute the CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR values, respectively. The invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 was used as the reference standard for evaluating the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and IVUS-FFR. RESULTS: Both AccuFFRivus and AccuFFRct demonstrated a strong correlation with invasive FFR (R = 0.7913, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.6296, P < 0.0001), and both methods showed good agreement with FFR. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.960 (P < 0.001) for AccuFFRivus and 0.897 (P < 0.001) for AccuFFRct in predicting FFR ≤ 0.80. FFR ≤ 0.80 were predicted with high sensitivity (96.6%), specificity (85.7%), and the Youden index (0.823) using the same cutoff value of 0.80 for AccuFFRivus. A good diagnostic performance (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 85.7%, and Youden index 0.754) was also demonstrated by AccuFFRct. CONCLUSIONS: AccuFFRivus, computed from IVUS images, exhibited a high diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial ischemia. It demonstrated better diagnostic power than AccuFFRct, and could serve as an accurate computational tool for ischemia diagnosis and assist in clinical decision-making.

Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis from Coronary Angiography and Computed Tomography: Angio-FFR vs. CT-FFR.

This study was designed to compare the diagnostic performance of angio-FFR and CT-FFR for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Angio-FFR and CT-FFR were measured in 110 patients (139 vessels) with stable coronary disease using invasive FFR as the reference standard. On per-patient basis, angio-FFR was highly correlated with FFR (r =0.78, p <0.001), while the correlation was moderate between CT-FFR and FFR (r =0.68, p <0.001). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for angio-FFR were 94.6%, 91.4%, and 96.0%, respectively; and those of CT-FFR were 91.8%, 91.4%, and 92%, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed that angio-FFR had a larger average difference and a smaller root mean squared deviation than CT-FFR compared with FFR (-0.014±0.056 vs. 0.0003±0.072). Angio-FFR had a slightly higher AUC than that of CT-FFR (0.946 vs. 0.935, p =0.750). Angio-FFR and CT-FFR computed from coronary images could be accurate and efficient computational tools for detecting lesion-specific ischemia of coronary artery stenosis. Angio-FFR and CT-FFR calculated based on the two types of images can both accurately diagnose functional ischemia of coronary stenosis. CT-FFR can act as a gatekeeper to the catheter room, assisting doctors in determining whether patients need to be screened by coronary angiography. Angio-FFR can be used in the catheter room to determine the functional significant stenosis for helping decision-making in revascularization.

Diagnostic performance of AccuFFRangio in the functional assessment of coronary stenosis compared with pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been increasingly used in the clinical workflow to assist clinical decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This clinical study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of coronary stenosis assessed by a non-invasive FFR analysis method (termed AccuFFRangio) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). It is a blinded, self-controlled, retrospective, and dual-center clinical investigation study. METHODS: Coronary angiography data and the related information of 320 patients with 320 vessels were collected, and AccuFFRangio was used to assess the FFR for these patients. Compared with the wire-measured FFR values, we evaluated AccuFFRangio performance by its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for AccuFFRangio in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis were 93.3%, 92.6%, 93.5%, 84.3%, and 97.1%, respectively. The direct correlation between computed AccuFFRangio and measured FFR was 0.812 (P<0.001), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of AccuFFRangio was 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study demonstrates the efficiency and accuracy of AccuFFRangio for clinical implementation when using invasive wire-measured FFR as a reference. Further validation is required in a large prospective multicenter study.

Fractional flow reserve for coronary stenosis assessment derived from fusion of intravascular ultrasound and X-ray angiography.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides good insight into lumen boundary and plaques; however, it is still difficult to detect functionally significant stenosis from IVUS images for the guidance of coronary percutaneous intervention (PCI). This study aimed to develop a novel method to estimate fractional flow reserve (FFR) value for determining the functional significance of coronary artery disease through the fusion of IVUS and X-ray angiographic images. METHODS: We developed a novel approach to 3D vessel reconstruction by integrating IVUS with X-ray angiographic images. Based on the reconstructed geometry and the inlet flow derived from the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count, a simplified fluid dynamics equation was established to compute the pressure drop and IVUS-derived FFR (AccuFFRivus) was subsequently obtained. To validate the feasibility and performance of this IVUS-based FFR method, we performed AccuFFRivus calculations on 32 coronary vessels with invasive FFR as the reference standard. RESULTS: Great correlation (r=0.86, P<0.001) was observed between AccuFFRivus and FFR. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was higher for AccuFFRivus than minimal lumen area (MLA, <4 mm2) and diameter stenosis rate (DS% ≥50%) [0.98 (95% CI: 0.86 to 1.0) vs. 0.78 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.91) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.82)]. Bland-Altman plot showed a mean difference value of -0.011 (limits of agreement: -0.156 to 0.134). CONCLUSIONS: AccuFFRivus is a novel method for hybridizing IVUS and X-ray angiographic images to identify functionally significant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80. The good diagnostic performance from the initial validation study demonstrates the potential for clinical utilization of physiologically guided decision-making. Further validation is required in future studies with a large number of cases.