Semi-automatic computed tomography angiography quantification assessment is an alternative method to digital subtraction angiography in intracranial stenosis: a multicenter study.

Background: The recent randomized controlled trials studying intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) have used digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to quantify stenosis and enroll patients. However, some disadvantages of DSA such as invasive features, contrast agent overuse, and X-ray radiation overexposure, were not considered in these studies. This study aimed to explore whether computed tomography angiography (CTA) with semi-automatic analysis could be an alternative method to DSA in quantifying the absolute stenotic degree in clinical trials. Methods: Patients with 50-99% ICAS were consecutively screened, prospectively enrolled, and underwent CTA and DSA between March 2021 and December 2021 at 6 centers. This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052925). The absolute stenotic degree of ICAS on CTA with semi-automatic analysis was calculated by several protocols using minimal/maximum/mean diameters of stenosis and reference site from a semi-automatic analysis software. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the reliabilities of quantifying stenotic degree on CTA. The optimal protocol for quantifying ICAS on CTA was explored. The agreements of quantifying ICAS in calcified or non-calcified lesions and 50-69% or 70-99% stenosis on CTA and DSA were assessed. Results: A total of 191 participants (58.8±10.7 years; 148 men) with 202 lesions were enrolled. The optimal protocol for quantifying ICAS on CTA was calculated as (1 - the minimal diameter of stenosis/the mean diameter of reference) × 100% for its highest agreement with DSA [ICC, 0.955, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.944-0.966, P<0.001]. Among the 202 lesions, 80.2% (162/202) exhibited severe stenosis on DSA. The accuracy of CTA in detecting severe ICAS was excellent (sensitivity =95.1%, positive predictive value =98.1%). The agreements between DSA and CTA in non-calcified lesions (ICC, 0.960 vs. 0.849) and severe stenosis (ICC, 0.918 vs. 0.841) were higher than those in calcified lesions and moderate stenosis. Conclusions: CTA with semi-automatic analysis demonstrated an excellent agreement with DSA in quantifying ICAS, making it promising to replace DSA for the measurement of absolute stenotic degree in clinical trials.

Assessment of Perfusion Volumes by a New Automated Software for Computed Tomography Perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the perfusion volumes assessed by a new automated CT perfusion (CTP) software iStroke with the circular singular value decomposition software RAPID and determine its predictive value for functional outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: Data on patients with AIS were collected from four hospitals in China. All patients received CTP followed by EVT with complete recanalisation within 24 hours of symptom onset. We evaluated the agreement of CTP measures between the two softwares by Spearman's rank correlation tests and kappa tests. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of infarct core volume (ICV) on CTP and ground truth on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Logistic regression models were used to test the association between ICV on these two softwares and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Among 326 patients, 228 had DWI examinations and 40 of them had infarct volume >70 mL. In all patients, the infarct core and hypoperfusion volumes on iStroke had a strong correlation with those on RAPID (ρ=0.68 and 0.66, respectively). The agreement of large infarct core (volume >70 mL) was substantial (kappa=0.73, p<0.001) between these two softwares. The ICV measured by iStroke and RAPID was significantly correlated with independent functional outcome at 90 days (p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). In patients with DWI examinations and those with an ICV >70 mL, the ICV of iStroke and RAPID was comparable on individual agreement with ground truth. CONCLUSION: The automatic CTP software iStroke is a reliable tool for assessing infarct core and mismatch volumes, making it clinically useful for selecting patients with AIS for acute reperfusion therapy in the extended time window.

Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum.

Polygenic scores (PGSs) have limited portability across different groupings of individuals (for example, by genetic ancestries and/or social determinants of health), preventing their equitable use1-3. PGS portability has typically been assessed using a single aggregate population-level statistic (for example, R2)4, ignoring inter-individual variation within the population. Here, using a large and diverse Los Angeles biobank5 (ATLAS, n = 36,778) along with the UK Biobank6 (UKBB, n = 487,409), we show that PGS accuracy decreases individual-to-individual along the continuum of genetic ancestries7 in all considered populations, even within traditionally labelled 'homogeneous' genetic ancestries. The decreasing trend is well captured by a continuous measure of genetic distance (GD) from the PGS training data: Pearson correlation of -0.95 between GD and PGS accuracy averaged across 84 traits. When applying PGS models trained on individuals labelled as white British in the UKBB to individuals with European ancestries in ATLAS, individuals in the furthest GD decile have 14% lower accuracy relative to the closest decile; notably, the closest GD decile of individuals with Hispanic Latino American ancestries show similar PGS performance to the furthest GD decile of individuals with European ancestries. GD is significantly correlated with PGS estimates themselves for 82 of 84 traits, further emphasizing the importance of incorporating the continuum of genetic ancestries in PGS interpretation. Our results highlight the need to move away from discrete genetic ancestry clusters towards the continuum of genetic ancestries when considering PGSs.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the two largest economies in the world: a comparison between the United States and China.

The broad impact of the COVID-19 on self-reported daily behaviors and health in Chinese and US samples remains unknown. This study aimed to compare physical and mental health between people from the United States (U.S.) and China, and to correlate mental health parameters with variables relating to physical symptoms, knowledge about COVID-19, and precautionary health behaviors. To minimize risk of exposure, respondents were electronically invited by existing study respondents or by data sourcing software and surveys were completed via online survey platforms. Information was collected on demographics, physical symptoms, contact history, knowledge about COVID-19, psychologic parameters (i.e. IES-R; DASS-21), and health behaviors. The study included a total of 1445 respondents (584 U.S.; 861 China). Overall, Americans reported more physical symptoms, contact history, and perceived likelihood of contracting COVID-19. Americans reported more stress and depressive symptoms, while Chinese reported higher acute-traumatic stress symptoms. Differences were identified regarding face mask use and desires for COVID-19 related health information, with differential mental health implications. Physical symptoms that were possibly COVID-19 related were associated with adverse mental health. Overall, American and Chinese participants reported different mental and physical health parameters, health behaviors, precautionary measures, and knowledge of COVID-19; different risk and protective factors were also identified.