Intracardiac energy inefficiency during atrial fibrillation rhythm with heart failure: Assessment by echo-vector flow mapping.

AIMS: Intracardiac dynamics during atrial fibrillation(AF) complicated by heart failure(HF) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intracardiac dynamics assessed by echo-vector flow mapping on AF complicated by HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 76 AF patients receiving sinus restoration therapy and assessed energy loss(EL) by echo-vector flow mapping during both AF rhythm and sinus rhythm. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to serum NT-proBNP level: high NT-proBNP group(≥1800 pg/ml during AF rhythm: N = 19), and low NT-proBNP group(N = 57). Outcome measures were average ELs/stroke volume(SV) in left ventricle(LV) and left atrium(LA). Average EL/SVs during AF rhythm in the LV and LA were significantly larger in the high NT-proBNP group than the low NT-proBNP group(54.2 mE/m·L versus 41.2 mE/m·L, P = 0.02; 3.2 mE/m·L versus 1.9 mE/m·L, P = 0.01). The significantly larger EL/SV in the high NT-proBNP group was recorded for maximum EL/SVs. In patients with high NT-proBNP, large vortex formation with extreme EL was detected in the LV and LA during the diastolic phase. After sinus restoration, the average decrease of EL/SV in the LV and LA was larger in the high NT-proBNP group(-21.4 mE/m·L versus +2.6 mE/m·L, P = 0.04; -1.6 mE/m·L versus -0.3 mE/m·L, P = 0.02). Average EL/SV during sinus rhythm did not significantly differ between the high and low NT-proBNP groups in the LV and LA. CONCLUSIONS: High EL during AF rhythm as intracardiac energy inefficiency was associated with high serum NT-proBNP levels and improved after sinus restoration.

Instability of rotational activation as atrial fibrillation drivers: Assessment by ExTRa Mapping system.

BACKGROUND: ExTRa Mapping™ has developed to visualize rotational activation as atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers. The current study was sought to evaluate the instability of AF drivers by ExTRa Mapping™. METHODS: Variation of nonpassively activated ratio (%NP) among three-time repetitive recordings before and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in left atrium was assessed in 26 persistent AF patients. The recoding time was set at 5 or 8 s for the respective patients. The outcome measures included %NP at each recording, mean value of the three-time recordings, and the instability index, which was defined as maximum difference per mean %NP × 100 (%). RESULTS: Total 683 sites 2049 recordings were assessed. Mean %NP was 33.3(23.3-42.7)%, and higher in sites with severe (≥50%) and patchy low voltage area than those without, but not in those with severe complex fractionated atrial electrogram area. There was significant correlation between actual and mean %NP (R = 0.86, P < .001), but maximum difference among the repetitive recordings was 16(10-24)%. The instability index of %NP was 55.9(30.9-83.6)%, and significantly lower at the recordings of 8 s compared with 5 s (50.6[28.6-78.4]% vs. 60.4[35.0-90.0]%, P = .004). Furthermore, it was higher at sites with lower reliability of the recordings. After PVI, mean %NP significantly decreased (28.7[18.3-36.7]% vs. 37.7[28.7-45.7]%, P < .001), but the instability index significantly increased compared with those before PVI (60.0[35.0-92.7]% vs. 48.9[29.1-75.0]%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Rotational activation as AF drivers assessed by ExTRa Mapping™ is unstable, and repetitive and longer recording is required for the reliable assessment even after PVI.

Public assistance in patients with acute heart failure: a report from the KCHF registry.

AIMS: There is a scarcity of data on the post-discharge prognosis in acute heart failure (AHF) patients with a low-income but receiving public assistance. The study sought to evaluate the differences in the clinical characteristics and outcomes between AHF patients receiving public assistance and those not receiving public assistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry was a physician-initiated, prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study enrolling 4056 consecutive patients who were hospitalized due to AHF for the first time between October 2014 and March 2016. The present study population consisted of 3728 patients who were discharged alive from the index AHF hospitalization. We divided the patients into two groups, those receiving public assistance and those not receiving public assistance. After assessing the proportional hazard assumption of public assistance as a variable, we constructed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the risk of the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group. There were 218 patients (5.8%) receiving public assistance and 3510 (94%) not receiving public assistance. Patients in the public assistance group were younger, more frequently had chronic coronary artery disease, previous heart failure hospitalizations, current smoking, poor medical adherence, living alone, no occupation, and a lower left ventricular ejection fraction than those in the no public assistance group. During a median follow-up of 470 days, the cumulative 1 year incidences of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalizations after discharge did not differ between the public assistance group and no public assistance group (13.3% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.10, and 28.3% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.25, respectively). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk of the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group remained insignificant for all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.32; P = 0.84]. Even after taking into account the competing risk of all-cause death, the adjusted risk within 180 days in the public assistance group relative to the no public assistance group remained insignificant for heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.34; P = 0.69), while the adjusted risk beyond 180 days was significant (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07-2.29; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The AHF patients receiving public assistance as compared with those not receiving public assistance had no significant excess risk for all-cause death at 1 year after discharge or a heart failure hospitalization within 180 days after discharge, while they did have a significant excess risk for heart failure hospitalizations beyond 180 days after discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02334891 (NCT02334891) and https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000017241 (UMIN000015238).