Pacific patients' reasons for attending the emergency department of Counties Manukau for non-urgent conditions.

AIM: To determine Pacific patients' reasons for Emergency Department (ED) use for non-urgent conditions by Pacific people at Counties Manukau Health. METHODS: Patients who self-presented to Counties Manukau ED with a non-urgent condition in June 2019 were surveyed. Responses to open-ended questions were analysed using a general inductive approach, in discussion with key stakeholders. RESULTS: Of 353 participants with ethnicity reported, 139 (39%) were Pacific, 66 (19%) Maori and 148 (42%) were non-Maori non-Pacific, nMnP. A total of 58 (42%) of Pacific participants had been to their general practitioner prior to presenting to the ED; this proportion was similar for Maori (19 [30%]) and nMnP (59 [40%]) (p=0.215). The most common reasons for ED attendance among Pacific (as well as other) participants were 1) advice by a health professional (41%, 95% CI 33-50%), 2) usual care unavailable (28%, 20-36%), 3) symptoms not improving (21%, 14-28%), and 4) symptoms too severe to be managed elsewhere (19%, 12-26%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple reasons underlie non-urgent use of EDs by Pacific and other ethnic groups. These reasons need to be considered simultaneously in the design, implementation, and evaluation of multi-dimensional initiatives that discourage non-urgent use of EDs to ensure that such initiatives are effective, equitable, and unintended consequences are avoided.

Readmission After Resections of the Colon and Rectum: Predictors of a Costly and Common Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Readmission rates are a measure of surgical quality and an object of clinical and regulatory scrutiny. Despite increasing efforts to improve quality and contain cost, 6% to 25% of patients are readmitted after colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to define the predictors and costs of readmission following colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective and nonelective colectomy and/or proctectomy in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Florida State Inpatient Database 2007 to 2011. Readmission is defined as inpatient admission within 30 days of discharge. Univariate analyses were performed of sex, age, Elixhauser score, race, insurance type, procedure, indication, readmission diagnosis, cost, and length of stay. Multivariate analysis was performed by logistic regression. Sensitivity analysis of nonemergent admissions was conducted. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in Florida acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing colectomy and proctectomy from 2007 to 2011 were included. INTERVENTION(S): There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes measured were readmission and the cost of readmission. RESULTS: A total of 93,913 patients underwent colectomy; 14.7% were readmitted within 30 days. From 2007 to 2011, readmission rates remained stable (14.6%-14.2%, trend p = 0.1585). After multivariate adjustment, patient factors associated with readmission included nonwhite race, age <65, and a diagnosis code other than neoplasm or diverticular disease (p < 0.0001). Patients with Medicare or Medicaid were more likely to be readmitted than those with private insurance (p < 0.0001). Patients with longer index admissions, those with stomas, and those undergoing all procedures other than sigmoid or transverse colectomy were more likely to be readmitted (p < 0.0001). High-volume hospitals had higher rates of readmission (p < 0.0001). The most common reason for readmission was infection (32.9%). Median cost of readmission care was $7030 (intraquartile range, $4220-$13,247). Fistulas caused the most costly readmissions ($15,174; intraquartile range, $6725-$26,660). LIMITATIONS: Administrative data and retrospective design were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions rates after colorectal surgery remain common and costly. Nonprivate insurance, IBD, and high hospital volume are significantly associated with readmission.

Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis: current utilization in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention is uncommon in chronic pancreatitis. Literature largely describes single institution or international experiences. This study describes US-based chronic pancreatitis surgical management. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of chronic pancreatitis patients in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Florida State Inpatient Database 2007-2011. Patients with malignancy or congenital abnormalities were excluded. Univariate analysis using the chi-square test. The number of readmissions, inpatient length of stay and cost using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Multivariate analysis of surgery by logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-one thousand four hundred and forty-five patients with chronic pancreatitis. 10.8% (2 307) underwent surgery including 1652 cholecystectomies, 564 drainage procedures and 498 pancreatectomies. Procedures decreased from 12.1% to 8.3% over time (P < 0.001), but intervention within 3 months increased (7.2% to 8.4%; P = 0.017). 15.3% (3 278) had pancreatic cysts/pseudocysts and 43.4% (9 312) had diabetes. The median numbers of admissions were 2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1,5] and 3 (IQR 2,7) among non-surgical and surgical patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Predictors of surgery were fewer co-morbidities, private insurance, and either diabetes mellitus or pancreatic cyst/pseudocyst. CONCLUSION: Chronic pancreatitis leads to numerous inpatient readmissions, but surgical intervention only occurs in a minority of cases. Complicated patients are more likely to undergo surgery. The complexities of chronic pancreatitis management warrant early multidisciplinary evaluation and ongoing consideration of surgical and non-surgical options.

Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits?

BACKGROUND: The volume effect in pancreatic surgery is well established. Regionalization to high-volume centres has been proposed. The effect of this proposal on practice patterns is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective review of pancreatectomy patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004-2011. Inpatient mortality and complication rates were calculated. Patients were stratified by annual centre pancreatic resection volume (low <5, medium 5-18, high >18). Multivariable regression model evaluated predictors of resection at a high-volume centre. RESULTS: In total, 129,609 patients underwent a pancreatectomy. The crude inpatient mortality rate was 4.3%. 36.0% experienced complications. 66.5% underwent a resection at high-volume centres. In 2004, low-, medium- and high-volume centres resected 16.3%, 24.5% and 59.2% of patients, compared with 7.6%, 19.3% and 73.1% in 2011. High-volume centres had lower mortality (P < 0.001), fewer complications (P < 0.001) and a shorter median length of stay (P < 0.001). Patients at non-high-volume centres had more comorbidities (P = 0.001), lower rates of private insurance (P < 0.001) and more non-elective admissions (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In spite of a shift to high-volume hospitals, a substantial cohort still receives a resection outside of these centres. Patients receiving non-high-volume care demonstrate less favourable comorbidities, insurance and urgency of operation. The implications are twofold: already disadvantaged patients may not benefit from the high-volume effect; and patients predisposed to do well may contribute to observed superior outcomes at high-volume centres.