Net ecosystem carbon and greenhouse gas budgets in fiber and cereal cropping systems.

To assess the contributions of fiber and cereal production on climate change, the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide (CO2), main exchanges of non-CO2 carbon, and methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were continuously monitored throughout two year-round crop cycles (Y1 and Y2: 1st and 2nd year-round crop cycles, respectively) using eddy covariance, biometric observation, and static chamber methods in typical cotton and wheat-maize rotational cropping systems in China. The evaluation of net ecosystem carbon budgets (NECBs: considering net ecosystem CO2 exchange and non-CO2 carbon exchanges by fertilization, seeding, and harvest) and greenhouse gas budgets (GHGBs: adding CH4 and N2O fluxes to the NECBs based on CO2 equivalents) showed that the cotton cropping system persistently functioned as an intensive carbon (-1527 and -974 kg C ha-1 yr-1) and greenhouse gas (GHG) source (5618 and 3591 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1) because of the large CO2 emissions during the long fallow periods (5748 and 5160 kg CO2 ha-1 in Y1 and Y2, respectively). The wheat-maize cropping system had high net ecosystem production (NEP) and low harvest index and therefore, served as a notable carbon sink (1461 kg C ha-1 yr-1 in Y2). Although high irrigation water and chemical fertilizer inputs stimulated N2O emissions, the wheat-maize cropping system still behaved as an important GHG sink (-4257 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1 in Y2) because of the tremendous net carbon sequestration. However, in Y1 incidental wind damage lowered the NEP and turned the wheat-maize cropping system into a GHG source (2144 kg CO2-eq ha-1 yr-1). The NEP, NECBs, and GHGBs of the double cropping system generally exceeded those of the single cropping system. The traditional rotation between double and single cropping systems should be restored to maintain soil carbon storage and alleviate the radiative forcing effects of cotton production.

Improving rice production sustainability by reducing water demand and greenhouse gas emissions with biodegradable films.

In China, rice production is facing unprecedented challenges, including the increasing demand, looming water crisis and on-going climate change. Thus, producing more rice at lower environmental cost is required for future development, i.e., the use of less water and the production of fewer greenhouse gas (GHG) per unit of rice. Ground cover rice production systems (GCRPSs) could potentially address these concerns, although no studies have systematically and simultaneously evaluated the benefits of GCRPS regarding yields and considering water use and GHG emissions. This study reports the results of a 2-year study comparing conventional paddy and various GCRPS practices. Relative to conventional paddy, GCRPSs had greater rice yields and nitrogen use efficiencies (8.5% and 70%, respectively), required less irrigation (-64%) and resulted in less total CH4 and N2O emissions (-54%). On average, annual emission factors of N2O were 1.67% and 2.00% for conventional paddy and GCRPS, respectively. A cost-benefit analysis considering yields, GHG emissions, water demand and labor and mulching costs indicated GCRPSs are an environmentally and economically profitable technology. Furthermore, substituting the polyethylene film with a biodegradable film resulted in comparable benefits of yield and climate. Overall, GCRPSs, particularly with biodegradable films, provide a promising solution for farmers to secure or even increase yields while reducing the environmental footprint.