Conversion from Aranesp® to NESP® in dialysis patients-Exploration of dosing strategies and the feasibility of extending the dosing interval.

AIM: Darbepoetin alpha is available as Aranesp® and NESP®, which differ in the inactive component and maximum dose-strength of prefilled syringes. We conducted an observational cohort study to investigate optimal conversion strategies and the feasibility of extending dosing intervals with higher-dose preparations in dialysis patients converting from Aranesp® to NESP®. METHODS: Adult dialysis patients on Aranesp® with stable haemoglobin of 9-12 g/dL were converted to NESP® at the same monthly total dose according to one of three conversion regimens. Group A included patients on ≤80 mcg/month of Aranesp® who converted with dosing regimen unchanged. Group B patients converted to NESP® with extended dosing intervals using higher individual dose preparations. Group C were patients on 100 mcg Aranesp® who converted to NESP® 120 mcg with extended dosing intervals. Patients were observed for 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. All 24 Group A patients maintained stable haemoglobin. In Group B, 10 patients (50%) maintained stable haemoglobin with extension of dosing interval from 1.04 ± 0.14 to 3.03 ± 1.28 weeks. Factors associated with success in extending dosing interval included a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease and a higher Kt/Vurea in peritoneal dialysis patients. Four patients (80%) in Group C maintained stable haemoglobin after conversion to NESP® 120 mcg with extended dosing interval. The use of NESP® 120 mcg was well tolerated, and was associated with reduced patient-reported pain score and 38% reduction of drug cost. CONCLUSION: Dialysis patients on Aranesp® can be successfully converted to NESP® and the dosing interval can be extended successfully in a significant proportion of patients, which could reduce discomfort and drug cost.

Non-invasive assessment of kidney allograft fibrosis with shear wave elastography: A radiological-pathological correlation analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of shear wave elastography in assessment of kidney allograft tubulointerstitial fibrosis. METHODS: Shear wave elastography assessment was carried out by two independent operators in kidney transplant recipients who underwent allograft biopsy for clinical indications (i.e. rising creatinine >15% or proteinuria >1 g/day). Allograft biopsies were interpreted by the same pathologist according to the 2013 Banff Classification. RESULTS: A total of 40 elastography scans were carried out (median creatinine 172.5 µmol/L [interquartile range 133.8-281.8 µmol/L]). Median tissue stiffness at the cortex (22.6 kPa [interquartile range 18.8-25.7 kPa] vs 22.3 kPa [interquartile range 19.0-26.5 kPa], P = 0.70) and medulla (15.0 kPa [interquartile range 13.7-18.0 kPa] vs 15.6 kPa [interquartile range 14.4-18.2 kPa]) showed no significant differences between the two observers. Interobserver agreement was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficient of the cortex 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-0.92 and intraclass correlation coefficient of the medulla 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.94). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for detection of tubulointerstitial fibrosis were estimated to be 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89), 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-0.95) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.53-0.78) for cortical, medullary tissue stiffness and serum creatinine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Shear wave elastography can be used as a non-invasive tool to evaluate kidney allograft fibrosis with reasonable interobserver agreement and superior test performance to serum creatinine in detecting early tubulointerstitial fibrosis.

Enhanced Psychosocial Support for Caregiver Burden for Patients With Chronic Kidney Failure Choosing Not to Be Treated by Dialysis or Transplantation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers of patients with chronic kidney failure have increased burden, as reflected by their high frequency of physical and mental disturbances. The impact of enhanced psychosocial support to caregivers of patients with chronic kidney failure remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All new patients referred to the renal palliative clinic were screened. Caregivers of patients who met the following criteria were recruited: (1) chronic kidney failure as defined by creatinine clearance < 15 mL/min, (2) opted for conservative management by nephrology team or patient, (3) never treated with dialysis or transplantation, and (4) able to provide informed consent. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to treatment with enhanced psychosocial support or standard renal care (control). Enhanced psychosocial support included counseling and psychosocial interventions by an on-site palliative care nurse and designated social worker. Each caregiver was followed up at 2- to 4-week intervals for up to 6 months. OUTCOMES: Zarit Burden Inventory (ZBI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in caregivers and McGill Quality of Life scores in patients of both groups were compared. RESULTS: 29 pairs of family caregivers/patients with chronic kidney failure were randomly assigned (intervention, n=14; control, n=15). Mean ages of patients and caregivers were 81.6 ± 5.1 and 59.8 ± 14.2 (SD) years, respectively. The intervention group showed significantly lower ZBI scores than the control group at 1 and 3 months (22.0 ± 5.3 vs 31.6 ± 9.5 and 21.3 ± 6.6 vs 33.4 ± 7.2; P=0.006 and P=0.009, respectively). HADS anxiety scores of caregivers who received the intervention were significantly lower than those of controls at 1 and 3 months (7.1 ± 3.2 vs 10.1 ± 2.2 and 6.5 ± 4.5 vs 11.0 ± 3.1; P=0.01 and P=0.03, respectively). Insignificant reductions in ZBI and HADS scores were found at 6 months. 19 patients died (intervention, n=10; control, n=9) during the study period. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by a relatively small sample size and short duration. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced psychosocial support program in patients with chronic kidney failure and caregivers resulted in an early significant reduction in caregiver burden and anxiety.

CT angiography versus conventional digital angiography in preoperative assessment for Chinese living kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) angiography is used for preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors, but its correlation with intraoperative findings during the transplant operation remains unknown. METHODS: Between April 1997 and October 2008, 34 consecutive pairs of living kidney transplants were carried out. Conventional digital angiography was employed for the preoperative assessment in the first 19 pairs, and CT angiography in the subsequent 15 pairs. The radiological reports and operative findings during kidney harvest were carefully examined and compared. RESULTS: Among the 34 cases in our cohort, we found 9 early branching renal arteries (26.4%) and 6 double renal arteries (17%). Venous and ureteral anomalies were rare, with only 1 case (2.9%) of each. CT angiography offered excellent and equal accuracy (accuracy 100%) when compared with conventional digital angiography for renal arterial anatomy. CT angiography showed superior performance compared with conventional angiography in the domain of venous and collecting system anomalies (accuracy 100% vs. 94.7%, respectively). No contrast nephropathy or allergy was documented in our series. CONCLUSIONS: CT angiography showed excellent correlations with surgical findings in the Chinese population. It is associated with minimal risk of contrast nephropathy as well as lower cost and therefore should be adopted as the standard preoperative assessment of living kidney donors.

Cost comparison between mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide-azathioprine in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the healthcare expenditure associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression in contrast to conventional therapy in patients with lupus nephritis. METHODS: Our retrospective single-center study compared the major healthcare costs during the first 24 months of treatment incurred by immunosuppressive medications, hospitalization, and complications in patients with severe lupus nephritis who had been treated with prednisolone and either MMF or sequential cyclophosphamide induction followed by azathioprine maintenance (CTX-AZA). RESULTS: Forty-four patients were studied (22 in each group). Baseline demographic and clinical measures, and remission rates after treatment, were similar between the 2 groups. Immunosuppressive drug cost was 13.6-fold higher in the MMF group (US$4168.3+/-1176.5 per patient, compared with $285.0+/-70.6 in the CTX-AZA group, mean difference $3883.2+/-251.3; p<0.001). MMF treatment was associated with a lower incidence of infections (12.0 episodes/1000 patient-months, compared with 32.4 in the CTX-AZA group; p=0.035). Combined cost of hospitalization and treatment of infections was 82.5% lower in the MMF group (mean difference -2208.7+/-1700.6; p=0.120). Overall treatment expenditure on immunosuppressive drugs, hospitalization, and treatment of infections was 1.57-fold higher in the MMF group (mean US $4635.9 compared with $2961.5 in the CTX-AZA group; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: While the cost of MMF treatment for severe lupus nephritis is much higher compared with CTX-AZA, the increased drug cost is partially offset by savings from the reduced incidence of complications.