Multifaceted intervention including education, rounding checklist implementation, cost feedback, and financial incentives reduces inpatient laboratory costs.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate laboratory testing is a contributor to waste in healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted laboratory reduction intervention on laboratory costs. DESIGN: A retrospective, controlled, interrupted time series (ITS) study. SETTING: University of Utah Health Care, a 500-bed academic medical center in Salt Lake City, Utah. POPULATION: All patients 18 years or older admitted to the hospital to a service other than obstetrics, rehabilitation, or psychiatry. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted quality-improvement initiative in a hospitalist service including education, process change, cost feedback, and financial incentive. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes of lab cost per day and per visit. Secondary outcomes of number of basic metabolic panel (BMP), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), complete blood count (CBC), and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio tests per day; length of stay (LOS); and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 6310 hospitalist patient visits (intervention group) were compared to 25,586 nonhospitalist visits (control group). Among the intervention group, the unadjusted mean cost per day was reduced from $138 before the intervention to $123 after the intervention (P < 0.001), and the unadjusted mean cost per visit decreased from $618 to $558 (P = 0.005). The ITS analysis showed significant reductions in cost per day, cost per visit, and the number of BMP, CMP, and CBC tests per day (P = 0.034, 0.02, <0.001, 0.004, and <0.001). LOS was unchanged and 30-day readmissions decreased in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted approach to laboratory reduction demonstrated a significant reduction in laboratory cost per day and per visit, as well as common tests per day at a major academic medical center. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:348-354. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Evidence-based care pathway for cellulitis improves process, clinical, and cost outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis is a common infection with wide variation of clinical care. OBJECTIVE: To implement an evidence-based care pathway and evaluate changes in process metrics, clinical outcomes, and cost for cellulitis. DESIGN: A retrospective observational pre-/postintervention study was performed. SETTING: University of Utah Health Care, a 500-bed academic medical center in Salt Lake City, Utah. PATIENTS: All patients 18 years or older admitted to the emergency department observation unit or hospital with a primary diagnosis of cellulitis. INTERVENTION: Development of an evidence-based care pathway for cellulitis embedded into the electronic medical record with education for all emergency and internal medicine physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Secondary outcomes of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging orders, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and pharmacy, lab, imaging, and total facility costs. RESULTS: A total of 677 visits occurred, including 370 visits where order sets were used. Among all patients, there was a 59% decrease in the odds of ordering broad-spectrum antibiotics (P < 0.001), 23% decrease in pharmacy cost (P = 0.002), and 13% decrease in total facility cost (P = 0.006). Compared to patients for whom order sets were not used, patients for whom order sets were used had a 75%, 13%, and 25% greater decrease in the odds of ordering broad-spectrum antibiotics (P < 0.001), clinical LOS (P = 0.041), and pharmacy costs (P = 0.074), respectively. CONCLUSION: The evidence-based care pathway for cellulitis improved care at an academic medical center by reducing broad-spectrum antibiotic use, pharmacy costs, and total facility costs without an adverse change in LOS or 30-day readmissions.