Effects of adaptive or fixed thresholds and different platforms on the assessment of plaque characteristics using coronary computed tomography angiography.

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is used to evaluate components of atherosclerosis. Either adaptive or diverse, fixed Hounsfield Units (HU) are used to define components such as low attenuation (LAP), mixed (MP) and calcified plaque (CP). Comparisons of different platforms and different thresholding approaches have not been extensively evaluated. We compare two fixed threshold options to an adaptive threshold option within a specific platform and to fixed threshold options measured with another platform. METHODS: Coronary segments (n â€‹= â€‹24) of good image quality, with well-defined boundaries and representing a broad range of atheroma were analyzed for LAP, MP and CP. Thresholds for LAP vs MP and MP vs CP were either Fixed30/350, Fixed75/350 or based on an automatically determined Adaptive option. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Within a single platform, measures were highly correlated irrespective of use of Adaptive or Fixed30/350 and Fixed75/350 thresholds (R â€‹≥ â€‹0.819, p â€‹< â€‹0.000001). The correlation slope for measures of LAP progressively diminished comparing the Adaptive versus Fixed30/350 and the Fixed75/350 versus the Fixed30/350 approaches but bias was small. Between-platform comparisons yielded less optimal results, particularly with respect to measures of LAP and with one platform yielding both very small LAP volumes and very small ranges of volumes. CONCLUSION: Measures of plaque components are highly correlated irrespective of use of Adaptive or Fixed threshold approaches within a given platform. But measures are more affected by the specific proprietary algorithms employed than by specific thresholding options, especially for LAP.

Statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS): strategies for prevention, assessment and management.

INTRODUCTION: Statins are the cornerstone for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction with recognized efficacy in primary and secondary prevention. Despite this, they remain underutilized due to concerns regarding adverse effects. Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are the most frequent cause of medication intolerance and discontinuation with a prevalence estimated at 10%, regardless of causality, with the consequence of increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This clinical perspective reviews recent developments in mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of statin myopathy, the role of the nocebo effect in perception of statin intolerance, and explores diverse components endorsed by international societies in establishing a statin intolerance syndrome. Non-statin drug alternatives that reduce low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol are also discussed, with emphasis on therapies with established effects on cardiovascular outcomes. EXPERT OPINION: Ultimately, a patient-centered clinical approach to managing SAMS is proposed to optimize statin tolerability, achieve guideline-recommended therapeutic goals and improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes with sirolimus-eluting stents in total coronary occlusions: the ACROSS/TOSCA-4 (Approaches to Chronic Occlusions With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents/Total Occlusion Study of Coronary Arteries-4) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine angiographic and clinical outcomes with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in total coronary occlusion (TCO) revascularization. BACKGROUND: Despite evaluation of drug-eluting stents beyond approved indications, few studies have evaluated their clinical benefit in TCO revascularization. METHODS: Among 15 centers in North America, 200 consecutive TCO patients (78.8% >6 weeks TCO age) were enrolled for treatment with SES. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic binary restenosis within the treated segment. RESULTS: Patient characteristics included: diabetes, 24.5%; prior infarction, 33.5%; and stent length, 45.9 mm median (quartile 1, 30.2 mm; quartile 2, 62.1 mm). A total of 199 patients (99.5%) were treated with SES, and procedural success was 98.0%. The 6-month binary restenosis rates were 9.5% in-stent, 12.4% in-segment, and 22.6% in-"working length" representing the entire treatment segment. Rates of 1-year target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and target vessel failure were 9.8%, 1.0%, and 10.9%, respectively. Stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (1.0%). Using logistic regression modeling with propensity score adjustment, the absolute reduction in binary restenosis with SES compared with a historical bare-metal stent control was 37.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.2% to 48.3%, p < 0.001; odds ratio: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.30, p < 0.0001). Among 32 patients (16%) identified with stent fracture, target lesion revascularization was more common than patients without fracture (25.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater lesion complexity than prior TCO trials, percutaneous revascularization with SES appears safe and results in substantial reductions in angiographic restenosis and failed patency and a low rate of repeat revascularization. These findings support the use of SES in TCO revascularization. (The ACROSS/TOSCA Trial; NCT00378612).