Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 79(5): 284-287, 2018 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29727232

RESUMO

Background Neck of femur fractures and their subsequent operative fixation are associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Consenting in this setting is suboptimal with the Montgomery court ruling changing the perspective of consent. This quality improvement project assessed the adequacy of consenting against British Orthopaedic Association-endorsed guidance and implemented a series of changes to improve the documentation of risks associated with surgery for fractured neck of femur. Methods Seventy consecutive patients who underwent any operative fixation of a neck of femur fracture were included over a 6-month period at a single centre. Patients unable to consent or without electronic notes were excluded. Consent forms were analysed and the documented potential risks or complications associated with surgery were compared to British Orthopaedic Association-endorsed guidance. A series of changes (using the plan, do study, act (PDSA) approach) was implemented to improve the adequacy of consent. Results Documentation of four out of 12 potential risks or complications was recorded in <50% of cases for patients with intracapsular fractures (n=35), and documentation of seven out of 12 potential risks or complications was recorded in <50% of cases for patients with extracapsular fractures (n=35). Re-audit following raising awareness and attaching consent guidance showed 100% documentation of potential risks or complications in patients with intracapsular and extracapsular fractures (n=70). A neck of femur fracture-specific consent form has been implemented which will hopefully lead to sustained improvement. Conclusions Consenting patients with fractured neck of femur for surgery in the authors' unit was suboptimal when compared to British Orthopaedic Association-endorsed consent guidance. This project has shown that ensuring such guidance is readily available has improved the adequacy of consent. The authors hope that introduction of a neck of femur fracture-specific consent form within their unit will lead to sustained adequate documentation of risks associated with surgery.


Assuntos
Termos de Consentimento , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Gestão de Riscos , Termos de Consentimento/normas , Termos de Consentimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA