Assessment of futility in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of futile resuscitation attempts to the outcome calculations of attempted resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Defined as partial resuscitations, we focused on a subgroup of patients in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated, but further efforts were soon abandoned due to evidence of futility. METHODS: We conducted this study using the Utstein template during a 12-month study period. We compared the event characteristics between full and partial resuscitation attempts and determined the incidence, survival and neurological outcome. RESULTS: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) attended a total of 314 OHCA cases. In 34 cases, resuscitation was not attempted due to futility. Seventy-four cases were partial resuscitation attempts where resuscitation was soon discontinued due to dismal prognostic factors. Partial attempts were associated with an unwitnessed OHCA, prolonged downtime, end-stage malignant disease, multiple trauma, asystole or pulseless electrical activity as the initial rhythm, and a first responding unit being the first unit on the scene (P < 0.05, respectively). The calculation of survival to hospital discharge rate was 14% and increased 5% when partial resuscitation attempts were excluded from the analysis. Seventy-four percentage had a Cerebral Performance Category 1-2 at hospital discharge. Shockable initial rhythm, public location and bystander CPR had a positive impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitative efforts were considered futile in 11% of cases and resuscitation was discontinued due to evidence of futility in additional 24% cases based on additional information. Terminating resuscitation should be identified as a separate subgroup of OHCA cases to better reflect the outcome.

Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate analgesia during general anaesthesia may present as undesirable haemodynamic responses. No objective measures of the adequacy of analgesia exist. We aimed at developing a simple numerical measure of the level of surgical stress in an anaesthetized patient. METHODS: Sixty and 12 female patients were included in the development and validation data sets, respectively. All patients had elective surgery with propofol-remifentanil target controlled anaesthesia. Finger photoplethysmography and electrocardiography waveforms were recorded throughout anaesthesia and various waveform parameters were extracted off-line. Total surgical stress (TSS) for a patient was estimated based on stimulus intensity and remifentanil concentration. The surgical stress index (SSI) was developed to correlate with the TSS estimate in the development data set. The performance of SSI was validated within the validation data set during and before surgery, especially at skin incision and during changes of the predicted remifentanil effect-site concentration. RESULTS: SSI was computed as a combination of normalized heart beat interval (HBI(norm)) and plethysmographic pulse wave amplitude (PPGA(norm)): SSI = 100-(0.7*PPGA(norm)+0.3*HBI(norm)). SSI increased at skin incision and stayed higher during surgery than before surgery; SSI responded to remifentanil concentration changes and was higher at the lower concentrations of remifentanil. CONCLUSIONS: SSI reacts to surgical nociceptive stimuli and analgesic drug concentration changes during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Further validation studies of SSI are needed to elucidate its usefulness during other anaesthetic and surgical conditions.

EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol anaesthesia: analysis of direct costs and immediate recovery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that electroencephalogram (EEG) bispectral index (BIS) monitoring can improve recovery after anaesthesia and save money by shortening patients' postoperative stay. We wanted to evaluate the direct costs of BIS monitoring and to measure immediate recovery after anaesthesia in patients with or without BIS monitoring. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were studied. At first, 40 patients were randomized to receive either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. In these patients, BIS was collected but the information was not displayed. Thereafter, the anaesthesiologists were trained to follow and understand the BIS information, and 40 patients were anaesthetized with aid of the monitoring. Recovery times were measured by a study coordinator. Drug consumption was calculated. RESULTS: BIS monitoring improved the immediate recovery after propofol anaesthesia, while no differences were seen in patients receiving sevoflurane. The consumption of both propofol and sevoflurane decreased significantly (29% and 40%, respectively). BIS monitoring increased direct costs in these patients; the break-even times (704 min for propofol and 282 min for sevoflurane) were not reached. CONCLUSION: BIS monitoring decreased the consumption of both propofol and sevoflurane and hastened the immediate recovery after propofol anaesthesia. Detailed cost analysis showed that the monitoring increased direct costs of anaesthesia treatment in these patients, mainly due to the price of special EEG electrodes used for relatively short anaesthesias.

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.

Beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of neuropathy. Respiration-related heart rate variability (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) reflects the function of parasympathetic nervous system during spontaneous ventilation while awake. RSA is also claimed to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Power spectrum analysis or various averaging techniques of the heart rate variability are usually applied. The current literature, however, does not usually interpret the ground rules and limitations of the method used, and this may sometimes lead to erroneous conclusions on the data. The aim of our study was to compare and analyse critically the performance of different methods of evaluating RSA during anaesthesia and positive pressure ventilation. Power spectrum analysis, the root mean square of the successive RR-interval difference (RMSSD), and two respiration related methods, RSA index and average phase RSA, were included in the comparison. To test these methods, 11 patients were anaesthetised with isoflurane and their lungs were ventilated mechanically with a frequency of 6 cycles min-1. Each patient received a bolus dose of atropine (20 micrograms kg-1) during the trial. Electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and tracheal pressure signal from respirator were recorded and analyses were performed off-line. We demonstrated that general indices, such as RMSSD, may be strongly affected by heart rate level and other non-respiration related variations in heart rate. We also showed that the effect of unwanted fluctuations on RSA can be reduced with respiration dependent beat-to-beat methods. Furthermore we confirmed that in addition to the amplitude, also the pattern of respiratory sinus arrhythmia is of interest: the pattern is reversed in phase compared to spontaneous breathing while awake, as we have shown earlier. To analyse RSA during anaesthesia, we recommend the use of an average phase RSA method based on beat-to-beat variability that shows both the amplitude and pattern of RSA. Finally, no measure of RSA should be used without a presentation of the actual beat-to-beat heart rate curve.