Sex Differences in 5-Year Outcomes After Deferral of Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment.

Background: The relationship between sex differences and long-term outcomes after fractional flow reserve (FFR)- and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)-guided deferral of revascularization has yet to be elucidated. Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM registry (long-term outcomes of Japanese patients with deferral of coronary intervention based on FFR in a multicenter registry), this study included 432 lesions from 385 patients (men, 323 lesions in 286 patients; women, 109 lesions in 99 patients) with paired data of FFR and iFR. The primary endpoint was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization. The median FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.85 [0.81, 0.88] vs. 0.87 [0.83, 0.91], P=0.002), but the iFR value was comparable between men and women (0.94 [0.90, 0.98] vs. 0.93 [0.89, 0.98], P=0.26). The frequency of discordance between FFR and iFR was comparable between men and women (19.5% vs. 23.9%, P=0.34), although with different discordance patterns (P=0.036). The cumulative incidence of 5-year TVF did not differ between men and women after adjustment for baseline characteristics (13.9% vs. 6.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.82 [95% confidence interval: 0.44-7.56]; P=0.41). Conclusions: Despite sex differences in the results for physiological indexes, the 5-year TVF in deferred lesions did not differ between men and women after adjustment for baseline characteristics.

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are widely accepted and recommended in Western and Japanese guidelines for appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention. There are, however, many differences in clinical situations between Japan and Western countries. Therefore, the Task Force on coronary physiology of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has proposed an expert consensus document to summarize current evidence and suggest the practical use of physiological lesion assessment in Japan.

Thrombotic Risk and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Revascularization Deferral After Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of thrombotic risk on the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with deferred revascularization after fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements. BACKGROUND: Deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR is generally considered to be safe, but after deferral, some patients have cardiovascular events over time. METHODS: From J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), 1,263 patients with deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR were evaluated. The association between thrombotic risk as assessed by CREDO-Kyoto (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto) thrombotic score and 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was investigated. RESULTS: FFR and high thrombotic risk (HTR) were associated with increased risk for 5-year TVF (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.11; P < 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.37-3.39; P < 0.001) and MACCE (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P < 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.56-2.84; P = 0.001). Patients with HTR had higher risk for 5-year TVF (HR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.45-3.66; P < 0.001) and MACCE (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.75-3.13; P < 0.001) than those without HTR, even when they had negative FFR. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of thrombotic risk provides additional prognostic value to FFR in predicting 5-year TVF and MACCE in patients with deferral of revascularization after FFR measurements. (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry; UMIN000014473).

Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease in Japan: A long-term longitudinal study using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The procedural numbers and medical costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mainly elective PCI, have been increasing in Japan. Owing to increased interest in the appropriateness of coronary revascularization, we conducted this medical economics-based evaluation of testing and diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed patients' medical insurance data to identify stable CAD patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, coronary angiography, or fractional flow reserve. Subjects were divided into anatomical and functional evaluation groups according to the modality of testing, and background factors were matched by propensity score. The endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), life years (LYs), medical costs, and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The observations were performed for 36 months. MACE, medical costs, and CEA of the functional group in the overall category were trending to be better than the anatomical group (MACE, P = .051; medical costs: 3,105 US$ vs 4,430 US$, P = .007; CEA: 2,431 US$/LY vs 2,902 US$/LY, P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The functional evaluation approach improved long-term clinical outcomes and reduced cumulative medical costs. As a result, the modality composition of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation was demonstrated to offer superior cost-effectiveness in stable CAD.

Correction to: Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

In the original publication of the article, author group affiliation was published incorrectly. The correct affiliation for author group is given in this correction.

Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report from the Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Disease Asia-Pacific Peripheral Artery Disease Consensus Statement Project Committee.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the most underdiagnosed, underestimated and undertreated of the atherosclerotic vascular diseases despite its poor prognosis. There may be racial or contextual differences in the Asia-Pacific region as to epidemiology, availability of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, and even patient treatment response. The Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Diseases (APSAVD) thus coordinated the development of an Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement (APCS) on the Management of PAD. OBJECTIVES: The APSAVD aimed to accomplish the following: 1) determine the applicability of the 2016 AHA/ACC guidelines on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease to the Asia-Pacific region; 2) review Asia-Pacific literature; and 3) increase the awareness of PAD. METHODOLOGY: A Steering Committee was organized to oversee development of the APCS, appoint a Technical Working Group (TWG) and Consensus Panel (CP). The TWG appraised the relevance of the 2016 AHA/ACC PAD Guideline and proposed recommendations which were reviewed by the CP using a modified Delphi technique. RESULTS: A total of 91 recommendations were generated covering history and physical examination, diagnosis, and treatment of PAD-3 new recommendations, 31 adaptations and 57 adopted statements. This Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of PAD constitutes the first for the Asia-Pacific Region. It is intended for use by health practitioners involved in preventing, diagnosing and treating patients with PAD and ultimately the patients and their families themselves.

Assessment of Microvasculature After Intervention as a Predictor of Wound Healing in Patients With Tissue Loss.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the correlation between vascular flow reserve (VFR) values and wound healing rate in patients with critical limb ischemia. BACKGROUND: Peripheral VFR may be useful for predicting complete wound healing after endovascular therapy (EVT). However, published reports included small numbers of patients from single centers and long-term outcomes remain unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study that consecutively enrolled 104 patients (115 limbs) who received EVT for ischemic ulcerations. All lesions were treated with conventional balloon angioplasty. After EVT, VFR was measured using a pressure/temperature guidewire. The study endpoints were correlation between VFR values and wound healing rate at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: The median VFR was 2.9. A total of 110 and 104 limbs completed the 3-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively. The 3-month and 1-year wound healing rates were 49% and 76%, respectively. VFR was significantly associated with the 3-month and 1-year wound healing (p < 0.001 for both). The crude hazard ratios of VFR (per 2-fold increase) for the 3-month and 1-year wound healing were 2.6 (1.7 to 3.9) and 2.9 (2.0 to 4.2), respectively. The estimated median time to wound healing was 5.0 (3.2 to 7.2) months, 3.3 (2.8 to 4.9) months, and 2.5 (2.0 to 3.0) months, when the VFR value was 2.4, 2.9, and 3.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Post-procedure VFR is significantly associated with wound healing. VFR, measured in the catheterization laboratory, is useful in clinical risk stratification for patients with critical limb ischemia after EVT. (Predictor of Wound Healing in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia-Multicenter Prospective Study; UMIN000012746).

Design of the Japanese Comprehensive Health-Economic Assessment for Appropriate Cardiac Imaging Strategy Including Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study (J-CONCIOUS).

Background: The evaluation of stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) has evolved, and contemporary clinical practice guidelines emphasize the importance of in-depth consideration of procedure indications, risk stratification, and results of non-invasive imaging tests. However, little is known about the appropriate selection of imaging modalities for ischemia evaluation and the comparative cost-effectiveness in real-world clinical practice. Methods and Results: The Japanese Comprehensive Health-Economic Assessment for Appropriate Cardiac Imaging Strategy including Outcome and cost-effectiveness in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study (J-CONCIOUS), a multicenter observational study, was designed to prospectively enroll 2,500 patients with suspected or known SCAD, register clinical information and administrative records, and follow patients for 3 years. Any diagnostic or cardiac imaging modality (including stress tests using electrocardiography, echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging; coronary computed tomographic angiography; and/or invasive coronary angiography with or without fractional flow reserve assessment) is acceptable. Clinical endpoints, such as all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction, will be obtained, along with quality of life assessment using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The cost-effectiveness of individual assessment patterns will be quantified by analysis of Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data, and quality-adjusted life years and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated. Conclusions: J-CONCIOUS is expected to establish a risk-based and cost-effective imaging strategy for the detection and evaluation of functional myocardial ischemia and/or anatomical coronary imaging in Japan.

Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are not always comfortable deferring treatment of a stenosis in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery because of the perception that there is a high risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The authors describe, using the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) trial, MACE rates when LAD lesions are deferred, guided by physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of deferring treatment in the LAD using FFR or iFR within the DEFINE-FLAIR trial. METHODS: MACE rates at 1 year were compared between groups (iFR and FFR) in patients whose physiological assessment led to LAD lesions being deferred. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization at 1 year. Patients, and staff performing follow-up, were blinded to whether the decision was made with FFR or iFR. Outcomes were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients had lesions deferred in the LAD (421 guided by FFR, 451 guided by iFR). The event rate with iFR was significantly lower than with FFR (2.44% vs. 5.26%; adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.95; p = 0.04). This was driven by significantly lower unplanned revascularization with iFR and numerically lower MI (unplanned revascularization: 2.22% iFR vs. 4.99% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.93; p = 0.03; MI: 0.44% iFR vs. 2.14% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.07; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: iFR-guided deferral appears to be safe for patients with LAD lesions. Patients in whom iFR-guided deferral was performed had statistically significantly lower event rates than those with FFR-guided deferral.

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

In this document, the background, concept, and current evidence are briefly summarized. The focus is on the clinical application of physiological lesion assessment from a practical standpoint for facilities that do not have ample experience. Finally, the characteristics of new resting indexes are summarized.

Assessment of vascular response after drug-eluting stents implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: an optical coherence tomography sub-study of the J-DESsERT.

Even in the drug-eluting stent era, diabetes mellitus (DM) patients have high incidences of restenosis and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of this study was to compare vascular response after stent implantation between sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in DM patients as well as in non-DM patients. In the Japan-Drug Eluting Stents Evaluation; a Randomized Trial (J-DESsERT), the OCT sub-study enrolled 75 patients who underwent 8 months follow-up imaging after SES or PES implantation. Mean neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness was significantly thinner in SES than PES in the DM group (77 ± 47 vs. 201 ± 114 µm, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (84 ± 37 vs. 212 ± 128 µm, p < 0.001). Unevenness of NIH thickness in longitudinal axis was significantly smaller in SES than PES in the DM group (348 ± 191 vs. 726 ± 385 µm, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (344 ± 174 vs. 679 ± 314 µm, p < 0.001). The percentage of uncovered struts was significantly greater in SES than PES in the DM group (24 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 14 %, p < 0.001) and in the non-DM group (16 ± 16 vs. 3 ± 4 %, p = 0.002). Compared with PES, SES showed more potent NIH inhibition in DM patients as well as in non-DM patients.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous reports have shown that prasugrel shows a rapid and consistent antiplatelet effect among European and US patients. Previous studies suggest that prasugrel might be expected to achieve an adequate antiplatelet effect in healthy Asian subjects, even at lower doses than those assessed in the TRITON-TIMI 38 study. In this study, the antiplatelet effect of prasugrel was evaluated in Japanese coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were randomized into four treatment groups: prasugrel 10/2.5mg (loading dose [LD]/maintenance dose [MD]), 15/3.75 mg or 20/5mg, and clopidogrel 300/75 mg. The LD of each regimen was administered the day before PCI, followed by 28-day MD on aspirin background therapy (81-100mg). Antiplatelet effects were evaluated by light transmission aggregometry and VASP assay. The mean inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) induced by 20 µM of adenosine diphosphate at 4 hours after LD was higher among the prasugrel 10/2.5mg, 15/3.75 mg and 20/5mg groups compared with the clopidogrel group (12.3%, 20.9%, 29.8% vs. 8.4%, respectively). The proportion of subjects with an IPA of <10% on Day 28 was lower among the prasugrel 15/3.75 mg, and 20/5mg groups than in the clopidogrel group (0%, 6.3% vs. 15.8%, respectively). No "major" or "clinically relevant non-major" bleeding was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel 15 mg LD/3.75 mg MD or higher doses was well tolerated and achieved a more rapid, higher and consistent antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel in Japanese CAD patients undergoing PCI.

Utility of new classification based on clinical and lesional factors after self-expandable nitinol stenting in the superficial femoral artery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of clinical classification schemes that assess primary patency after self-expandable nitinol stent in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective study of prospective databases. From April 2004 to December 2009, 1001 limbs (807 patients) that underwent successful nitinol stent implantation for de novo SFA lesions were identified and analyzed. Primary patency was defined as treated vessel without restenosis (defined as >2.4 of peak systolic velocity ratio by duplex) and repeat revascularization. Six items were included in the classification: female, diabetes, dialysis, critical limb ischemia (CLI), lesion length > 150 mm, and poor runoff; the FeDCLIP score. A lesion length >150 mm was scored as 2 points. The others were assigned 1 point each. The scores of 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and ≥5 points were classified as low-, moderate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. Outcome measures were primary and secondary patency and all-cause mortality up to 6 years in each risk group. RESULTS: The mean follow-up interval was 26.8 ± 14.6 months. Primary patencies were 85.7%, 77.3%, and 74.2% in the low-risk group; 71.5%, 54.7%, and 51.9% in the moderate-risk group; and 53.0%, 24.3%, and 20.8% in the high-risk group at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The secondary patencies were 94.6%, 92.3%, and 90.8% in the low-risk group; 89.5%, 83.1%, and 83.1% in the moderate-risk group; and 82.7%, 73.1%, and 73.1% in the high-risk group at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There were significant differences in primary and secondary patency among the three risk groups (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). Overall survival rates were 96.8%, 89.5%, and 81.8% in the low-risk group; 91.5%, 74.4%, and 68.7% in the moderate-risk group; and 78.2%, 63.2%, and 48.7% in the high-risk group at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There were also significant differences in mortality (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: New classification schemes based on FeDCLIP score were useful for risk stratification in vessel patency and mortality after self-expandable nitinol stenting for SFA disease.

The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: a critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to study the long-term clinical effects of routine angiographic follow-up and related reintervention after drug-eluting stenting. BACKGROUND: Prior stent trials have shown that protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up increases repeat interventions compared with clinical follow-up alone. The long-term clinical impact of this practice is unknown. METHODS: Long-term outcomes of patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up in 3 large-scale TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) trials were compared with patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, in a propensity score-adjusted patient-level meta-analysis. Outcomes were also compared in patients with treated versus untreated nonischemic intermediate lesions (quantitative angiographic stenosis between >or=40% and <70%) detected at angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 5 years were significantly higher in the angiographic compared with clinical follow-up cohort (18.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). This was due to more frequent treatment of intermediate lesions, but there was no associated reduction in rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.93). Of patients with nonischemic intermediate lesions, 17% who were not revascularized at the time of angiographic follow-up had a subsequent TLR, whereas 7% of patients who had TLR at this follow-up angiogram required additional revascularization during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of routine angiographic follow-up increases oculostenotic revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions without affecting subsequent rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, and TLR was not required in 83% of those lesions. A conservative approach, in which repeat angiography is limited to patients with recurrent ischemia or progressive symptoms, minimizes repeat revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions and optimizes long-term event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Assessment of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation with aspirin plus low dose ticlopidine administration: one year results from CYPHER Stent Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry (J-PMS).

BACKGROUND: Clinical data of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation are under investigation in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CYPHER stent Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry (J-PMS) was conducted at 50 medical centers to assess the results of SES in daily clinical practice exclusively under aspirin plus low dose ticlopidine (200 mg/day). A total of 2,459 lesions in 2,054 patients were treated with 3,285 SES. The mean age was 67.1 +/-10.1 years, 75.6% were men and 43.3% were diabetics. Intravascular ultrasound was used in 77.2%. The 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical follow-up data were available in 85.4% and 96.8%, respectively. Quantitative coronary angiography showed the reference vessel diameter and percentage diameter stenosis at baseline were 2.47 +/-0.58 mm and 72.0 +/-16.1%. The 8-month late loss was 0.20 +/-0.50 mm. The major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year was 7.3%; cardiac death: 1.1%, myocardial infarction (MI): 1.2%, and target lesion revascularization (TLR): 4.2%. The rates of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 1 year were 0.30% and 0.10%, respectively. Hemodialysis was the strongest predictor of death/MI or TLR. CONCLUSIONS: J-PMS showed the effectiveness of SES implantation under aspirin plus low dose ticlopidine administration at 1 year, although further studies are necessary to demonstrate the safety.