Epidemiology and Management of Drug-induced Liver Injury: Importance of the Updated RUCAM.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of acute liver injury, liver failure, and liver transplantation worldwide. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become widely used. This has led to an increase in DILI, for which pathophysiology and management methods differ significantly from the past. As the number of cases of acute liver injury and liver transplantation due to DILI is expected to increase, information about a DILI is becoming more valuable. DILI is classified into two types according to its etiology: intrinsic DILI, in which the drug or its metabolites cause liver damage that is dose-dependent and predictable; and idiosyncratic DILI, in which liver damage is also dose-independent but unpredictable. In addition, depending on the course of the disease, chronic DILI or drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis may be present. The number of DILI cases caused by antimicrobial agents is decreasing, whereas that caused by drugs for malignant tumors and health foods is increasing. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method is widely used to assess causality in DILI. Liver injury is a type of immune-related adverse event. The pattern of hepatic injury in immune-related adverse events is mostly hepatocellular, but mixed type and bile stasis have also been reported. Sclerosing cholangitis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors has also been reported as a unique type of injury. Treatment mainly comprises withdrawal of immune checkpoint inhibitors and steroid administration; however, mycophenolate mofetil may be considered if the disease is refractory to steroids.

Noninvasive assessment of liver disease severity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of simple, noninvasive tests (NITs) in NAFLD patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an individual patient data meta-analysis of 1780 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and T2D. The index tests of interest were FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography, and AGILE 3+. The target conditions were advanced fibrosis, NASH, and fibrotic NASH(NASH plus F2-F4 fibrosis). The diagnostic performance of noninvasive tests. individually or in sequential combination, was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and by decision curve analysis. Comparison with 2278 NAFLD patients without T2D was also made. In NAFLD with T2D LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed, both NFS and FIB-4 for advanced fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve:LSM 0.82, AGILE 3+ 0.82, NFS 0.72, FIB-4 0.75, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index 0.68; p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests), with an uncertainty area of 12%-20%. The combination of serum-based with LSM-based tests for advanced fibrosis led to a reduction of 40%-60% in necessary LSM tests. Decision curve analysis showed that all scores had a modest net benefit for ruling out advanced fibrosis at the risk threshold of 5%-10% of missing advanced fibrosis. LSM and AGILE 3+ outperformed both NFS and FIB-4 for fibrotic NASH (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve:LSM 0.79, AGILE 3+ 0.77, NFS 0.71, FIB-4 0.71; p < 0.001 of LSM-based versus simple serum tests). All noninvasive scores were suboptimal for diagnosing NASH. CONCLUSIONS: LSM and AGILE 3+ individually or in low availability settings in sequential combination after FIB-4 or NFS have a similar good diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis and an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic NASH in NAFLD patients with T2D.

Real-world assessment of SmartExam, a novel FibroScan computational method: A retrospective single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: SmartExam is a novel computational method compatible with FibroScan that uses a software called SmartDepth and continuous controlled attenuation parameter measurements to evaluate liver fibrosis and steatosis. This retrospective study compared the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and SmartExam-equipped FibroScan for liver stiffness measurement (LSM). METHODS: The liver stiffness and the associated controlled attenuation parameters of 167 patients were measured using conventional and SmartExam-Equipped FibroScan as well as reference methods like magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) measurements to assess its diagnostic performance. M or XL probes were selected based on the probe-to-liver capsule distance for all FibroScan examinations. RESULTS: The liver stiffness and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) correlation coefficients calculated from conventional and SmartExam-equipped FibroScan were 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Using MRE/MRI-PDFF as a reference and the DeLong test for analysis, LSM and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CAP measured by conventional and SmartExam-equipped FibroScan showed no significant difference. However, the SmartExam-equipped FibroScan measurement (33.6 s) took 1.4 times longer than conventional FibroScan (23.2 s). CONCLUSIONS: SmartExam has a high diagnostic performance comparable with that of conventional FibroScan. Because the results of the conventional and SmartExam-equipped FibroScan were strongly correlated, it can be considered useful for assessing the fibrosis stage and steatosis grade of the liver in clinical practice, with less variability but little longer measurement time compared with the conventional FibroScan.

A 3-step approach to predict advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: impact on diagnosis, patient burden, and medical costs.

A 2-step approach, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) followed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), has been proposed to predict advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to develop a novel 3-step approach for predicting advanced fibrosis. We enrolled 284 biopsy-confirmed NAFLD patients from two tertiary care centers and developed subgroups (n = 190), including 3.7% of patients with advanced fibrosis, assuming a primary care setting. In the 3-step approach, patients with intermediate-to-high FIB-4 in the first step underwent an enhanced liver fibrosis test or measurement of type IV collagen 7S domain as the second step, and VCTE was performed if the second step value was higher than the cutoff. In 284 cases, a tertiary care cohort with 36.3% advanced fibrosis, the 3-step approach showed significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value than the 2-step approach. In the subgroup with 3.7% advanced fibrosis, the 3-step approach significantly reduced the referral rate to specialists, the number of high-risk patients (i.e., liver biopsy candidates), and healthcare costs by 12.5% to 15.8%. The 3-step approach may improve the diagnostic performance to predict advanced fibrosis in NAFLD, which could lower rates of referrals to specialists, liver biopsies, and medical costs.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of pathological hepatic findings in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is expected to increase because of the current epidemics of obesity and diabetes, and NAFLD has become a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Liver fibrosis is associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with NAFLD. Additionally, increased mortality and liver-related complications are primarily seen in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); however, nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) is believed to be benign and non-progressive. Therefore, distinguishing between NASH and NAFL is clinically important. Liver biopsy is the gold standard method for the staging of liver fibrosis and distinguishing between NASH and NAFL. Unfortunately, liver biopsy is an invasive and expensive procedure. Therefore, noninvasive methods, to replace biopsy, are urgently needed for the staging of liver fibrosis and diagnosing NASH. In this review, we discuss the recent studies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including magnetic resonance elastography, proton density fat fraction measurement, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) that can be used in the assessment of NASH components such as liver fibrosis, steatosis, and liver injury including inflammation and ballooning.

Elastography Techniques for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is expected to increase in prevalence because of the ongoing epidemics of obesity and diabetes, and it has become a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Liver fibrosis is associated with long-term outcomes in patients with NAFLD. Liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard method for the staging of liver fibrosis. However, it has several problems. Therefore, simple and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are urgently needed in place of biopsy. This review discusses recent studies of elastography techniques (vibration-controlled transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, two-dimensional shear wave elastography, and magnetic resonance elastography) that can be used for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

Assessment of 10-year changes in liver stiffness using vibration-controlled transient elastography in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

AIM: Although liver biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), repeated assessment of patients' liver tissue conditions are impractical. We assessed the 10-year changes in liver stiffness measurements (LSM) utilizing vibration-controlled transient elastography in NAFLD patients. METHODS: From January 2006 to September 2007, LSM was carried out for 97 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients. Of these, 34 patients underwent 10-year LSM reassessments (14 of them with paired biopsies). RESULTS: We evaluated the changes in the fibrosis stage as estimated using LSM (FS-LSM). Over a 10-year period, 32.4% had FS-LSM progression, 50% had static disease, and 17.6% had FS-LSM improvement. From among the initially diagnosed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients, 18% had progressed to considerable stage 4 (cirrhosis) 10 years later. In this cohort, none of the patients who had been initially diagnosed as FS-LSM stage 0 had progressed to cirrhosis 10 years later. The changes in LSM were correlated with the change in the histological fibrosis stage, the NAFLD activity score, and the change in the sum of the steatosis, activity, and fibrosis score. Improving more than 1 body mass index (kg/m2 ) and having a higher initial aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or ALT responder (>30% improvement or reduction to less than 40 IU/L) were factors contributing to LSM improvements (≥2 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Vibration-controlled transient elastography is likely to become a more clinically important tool for the long-term monitoring of NAFLD patients.

Evaluation of the Liver Fibrosis Index calculated by using real-time tissue elastography for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.

AIM: A rapid and non-invasive method of detecting fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases is of major clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to comparatively investigate the effectiveness of the Liver Fibrosis Index (LF Index) calculated using real-time tissue elastography (RTE) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 93 patients with biopsy-proven CHC were included. They underwent transient elastography (TE), serum liver fibrosis marker testing and RTE to calculate the LF Index. RESULTS: The LF Index showed a stepwise increase with increasing histological severity of fibrosis in CHC patients (P = 0.0102), whereas no significant correlation of the LF Index with the histological severity of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients (P = 0.852). There was a significant correlation between the LF Index and liver stiffness measured by TE in CHC patients (r = 0.319, P = 0.0009). On the other hand, no such correlation was observed in NAFLD patients. While in CHC patients, the LF Index was correlated with the FIB-4 index, no such correlation was observed in NAFLD patients. CONCLUSION: The LF Index calculated by RTE is effective for assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with CHC. On the other hand, it is not useful in patients with NAFLD. This is the first study to compare the clinical usefulness of RTE as non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis between CHC and NAFLD. Further investigations are required to refine statistical assessment of RTE.