Accuracy of using Diagnosis Procedure Combination administrative claims data for estimating the amount of opioid consumption among cancer patients in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The state of opioid consumption among cancer patients has never been comprehensively investigated in Japan. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination claims data may be used to measure and monitor opioid consumption among cancer patients, but the accuracy of using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data for this purpose has never been tested. METHODS: We aimed to ascertain the accuracy of using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination claims data for estimating total opioid analgesic consumption by cancer patients compared with electronic medical records at Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital. We calculated percent differences between estimates obtained from electronic medical records and Diagnosis Procedure Combination claims data by month and drug type (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, codeine and tramadol) between 1 October 2012 and 30 September 2013, and further examined the causes of discrepancy by reviewing medical and administrative charts between April and July 2013. RESULTS: Percent differences varied by month for drug types with small prescription volumes, but less so for drugs with larger prescription volumes. Differences also tended to diminish when consumption was compared for a year instead of a month. Total percent difference between electronic medical records and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data during the study period was -0.1% (4721 mg per year per hospital), as electronic medical records as baseline. Half of the discrepancy was caused by errors in data entry. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that Diagnosis Procedure Combination claims data can be used to accurately estimate opioid consumption among a population of cancer patients, although the same conclusion cannot be made for individual estimates or when making estimates for a group of patients over a short period of time.

Prevalence of analgesic prescriptions among patients with cancer in Japan: an analysis of health insurance claims data.

OBJECTIVES: To promote effective management of cancer pain as a nationwide health policy, it is necessary to monitor the performance of health care providers in managing pain in their patients. To plan a system that monitors the performance of pain management, the exact Methods of measurement, including the range of target patients, and estimate the resources must be defined. Performance in pain management can be evaluated either in all patients with cancer or restricted to patients with cancer who are already taking analgesics. Restricting the target patient group to patients on analgesics may be more efficient but the extent of that efficiency remains uncertain. METHODS: Using insurance claims from eight employer-sponsored insurance companies, we analyzed data from patients (N = 2858) who had received anti-cancer treatment (ie, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy) for the five major cancers in Japan (ie, breast, colorectal, liver, lung, and stomach cancers). RESULTS: Overall, 22.9% of patients received some kind of analgesic prescription in the course of a month. Lung cancer patients were more likely to be prescribed analgesic prescriptions (any analgesics 34.8%; opioids 18.2%) than patients with the other four cancers. The observed percentage of patients who received analgesic prescriptions over the study period (ie, January 2005 to November 2009) decreased. CONCLUSION: If we limit the target patient group to patients with cancer already on analgesics, we can reduce the number of persons to be contacted by about three-fourths, compared to assessing pain in all patients with cancer. Although we do not wish to ignore the problem of undetected pain among patients with cancer, beginning our systematic evaluation with patients with cancer already on analgesics may be a realistic option.

[Validity of recommended minimum dose of prior morphine to initiate transdermal fentanyl patch in prescribing information - multicenter survey of on prescriptions by palliative care specialists in Japan].

For initiating the minimum-size (0.25 microg/hour) transdermal fentanyl patch (TDF), 45 mg a day of oral morphine is the recommended minimum dose (RMD) in Japan according to the prescribing information. However, little is known about the validity of the RMD, and we can presume there are many cases where clinicians are inclined to initiate the minimum-size TDF at the early stage contrary to the RMD due to the high morbidity rate of digestive system cancer in Japan. In order to verify the validity of the RMD, we collected 71 retrospective cases where the minimum-size TDF was initiated against the restriction of RMD. The prior morphine (or equivalent doses of other opioids) was prescribed by palliative care specialists at 5 facilities which belong to Symptom Control Research Group (SCORE-G). Then, the side effects and pain control from the 1st to the 4th day were analyzed. The mean age of subjects was 68, and the main reason for initiating TDF therapy was gastrointestinal symptoms (63.4%). The frequency of side effects such as somnolence, nausea, vomiting and constipation did not show a significant correlation with the prior opioid dose.However,severe dyspnea and respiration depression were documented in two patients, and the above rate was three times higher than the nationwide result of the same side effects (0.9 8%). According to the Numeric Rating Scale (from 0: no pain to 10: the worst pain), the pain intensity decreased from 6.6 on the 1st day to 2.8 on the 2nd day, 3.3 on the 3rd day, and 2.9 (p < 0.001) on the 4th day. We conclude that, although introducing the minimum-size TDF against the RMD served to decrease the pain intensity,it raised the side effects on the respiratory system even when prescribed by palliative care specialists. Therefore,the RMD regulation is valid for general practitioners from a medical safety standpoint.