Capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of small bowel diseases: a health technology assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been widely used in the diagnosis of small bowel disease (SBD) in the world. To bring CE into the national health insurance directory, and intensify its popularization in primary hospital, the government needs high-quality HTA evidence for decision makers. We were appointed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, economy, and applicability of CE in the diagnosis of SBD, to provide the best currently available evidence for decision making. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, INAHTA, VIP, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data. All confirmed or suspected SBD patients with diagnosis by CE versus other alternative therapies were considered. Health technology assessments (HTAs), systematic reviews (SRs), meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), guidelines and economic studies were included. Two investigators selected studies, assessed the quality and extracted data independently, and a descriptive analysis was used. RESULTS: We included 4 HTAs, 11 SRs/meta-analyses, 2 RCTs, 5 guidelines, and 10 economic studies for assessment. The results showed that the disease detection rate of CE was higher than that of many other traditional technologies and that the main adverse event for CE was retention (0.7% to 3.0%). These results were consistent with those of the guidelines. Comprehensive results of economic studies showed the superiority of CE compared with other technologies. As the first choice, CE can decrease potential costs, especially when used in outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: (i) CE has advantages in diagnostic yield, safety, and cost in the diagnosis of SBD, but some limitations exist. It still needs more high-quality evidence on CE diagnosis accuracy. (ii) When the government approves the introduction of CE in a hospital, many factors must be considered, such as the local disease burden, clinical demand, ability to pay, and staff. At the same time, it is necessary to standardize training for operating physicians, to reduce economic losses caused by poor technical ability of the medical staff.

Helical tomotherapy for cancer treatment: a rapid health technology assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Helical tomotherapy (HT) can be applied to treat complex malignant cancer with high-precise radiotherapy, and it can reduce the damage to normal tissues and improve treatment effects. But the procurement of HT must be approved by relevant departments of administration affairs. This study, appointed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China and undertook by the National Health Development Research Center and the Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, was aimed to rapidly assess the effectiveness, safety, costs, and applicability of HT, so as to provide currently available best evidence for decision-makers of health policies. METHODS: We electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, and other professional websites. Two reviewer independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed quality, and then performed descriptive analysis. RESULTS: (i) We finally included 150 studies, encompassing 5 HTAs, 18 CCTs, and 127 observational studies. (ii) The included HTAs were published during 2006-2009, providing fairly less evidence of low quality and the results of 145 primary studies showed that: HT had been used mainly in the treatments of 14 kinds of cancer, with low total toxicity and high survival rates. Although the quality of the included studies was poor, there was much evidence about prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, nasopharynx cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer and liver cancer, with enough sample and fairly reliable results in HT efficacy and safety. And (iii) a total of 56 clinical trials were registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, most of which were registered by the occident. Among them, 9 were completed but the results had not been published yet. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of this study showed that, HT is safe and effective in clinic. But the abovementioned conclusion needs to be verified by conducting more high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. The costs of HT in procurement, maintenance, and application are high; and the skills, training, and qualification of operators are required. We suggest that the procurement of HT should be reduced; it should be allocated rationally and effectively used after comprehensive assessment in China's cancer epidemiology characteristics, health resource allocation, disease burden, medical service level, etc.; and also high-quality studies with long-term follow-up should be financially supported on the basis of establishing projects, so as to provide local evidence and consistently guide and improve scientific decision-making.