Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 103(1 Pt 1): 54-9, 1999 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9893185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common and costly condition. Concomitant asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) have been shown to increase the medication costs for people with asthma. No studies have compared medical care costs of those with and without concomitant AR. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence and incremental medical care costs of concomitant AR. METHODS: For each member of a population-based asthma cohort, we used all their medical charts within Olmsted County to record age at first diagnosis of asthma; the presence and age of any diagnosis of AR; and the total, ambulatory, and respiratory care-related costs of medical care. Costs were compared for age- and sex-specific strata of people with asthma who did and did not have AR. RESULTS: AR was most commonly diagnosed in people whose asthma was diagnosed before age 25 (prevalence of 59%) and uncommonly diagnosed in anyone after age 40 (prevalence <15%). Yearly medical care charges were on average 46% higher for those with asthma and concomitant AR than for persons with asthma alone, controlling for age and sex. We were unable to assess the impact of treatment of AR on medical care charges. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should consider the diagnosis of AR (prevalence >50%) in all symptomatic children and young adults with asthma. Further evaluation is necessary to evaluate the ability of treatment to decrease the incremental costs of AR in persons with asthma.


Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Perene/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 38(8): 765-70, 1996 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8863201

RESUMO

Latex is a common cause of occupational allergy in health care workers; latex-sensitized patients are at increased risk of allergic reactions in medical environments. Skin test reagents and latex-specific immunoglobulin E immunoassays were established for diagnosis of latex allergy. Inhibition immunoassays were developed for measuring latex aeroallergens and latex allergens in rubber products. A registry of latex-sensitive employees was established. High-allergen gloves were removed from the medical center inventory; latex aeroallergen levels subsequently declined. Despite an increasing number of gloves used annually, expenditures for gloves in 1994 were lower than in previous years. Latex-sensitive individuals can be identified using skin tests or immunoassays. Latex aeroallergen levels in medical environments can be reduced substantially at lower cost by using powder-free rubber gloves with lower allergen content.


Assuntos
Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Luvas Protetoras/efeitos adversos , Pessoal de Saúde , Látex/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Luvas Protetoras/economia , Hospitais de Prática de Grupo/organização & administração , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Tamanho da Partícula , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA