Second Footprint of Reports from Low- and Low- to Middle-Income Countries in the Neurosurgical Data: A Study from 2018-2020 Compared with Data from 2015-2017.

OBJECTIVE: In 2019, we highlighted the disparities in scientific production between high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) by emphasizing how scientific research was underrepresented in the latter. The present study aimed to investigate research productivity in neurosurgery of low-income countries (LICs) and LMICs for the years 2018-2020 and to compare it with the results of our previous study for 2015-2017. METHODS: We performed a retrospective bibliometric analysis using PubMed and Scopus databases to record all the reports published in 2018-2020 by investigators affiliated with neurosurgical departments in LICs and LMICs. The attribution of the study to LMICs was based on the presence of either the first author or the majority of authors. RESULTS: Our systematic search identified 486 studies reported by LICs and LMICs for full text examination in 12 journals. These articles represent 4.9% of all published neurosurgical articles, compared with 4.5% in the 2015-2017 study. India remained the country with the highest contribution, with a 17.1% increase in reports. Other countries, such as Nigeria and Philippines, also show an increased percentage of reports (from 0.9% to 3.7% and from 0.6% to 2.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is growing consensus in the neurosurgical scientific community that the dissemination and analysis of epidemiologic and clinical data from developing countries can provide guidelines and practical suggestions worldwide. However, our study shows that the number of neurosurgical articles published by low-income countries in 2018-2020 remained at approximately 5% of the total, resulting in a negative impact on the process of globalization.

Intracranial Meningiomas in the Elderly: Clinical, Surgical and Economic Evaluation. A Multicentric Experience.

Meningioma is one of the most common intracranial tumors. It is benign and slow growing in the majority of cases. Given the increase in life expectancy and the number of radiological tests performed, the incidence in the elderly population (≥65 years) is continuously increasing. The surgical outcomes and prognostic factors in this age group are unclear. A retrospective analysis of all the patients treated for intracranial meningiomas in two different Italian institutions was performed. The clinical, radiological, surgical and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to identify relationships between factors and outcomes. We also carried out an economic analysis. We analyzed 321 patients with intracranial meningioma. The mean age was 72.6 years (range, 65-90), with a female predominance (F/M, 1.41). Pre-operative deficits, cognitive impairment and seizures (p < 0.001) were associated with a worse post-operative Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score (<80). A high pre-operative KPS score was associated with a good clinical and neurological outcome (p < 0.001). Being aged between 65 and 74 years, low surgical timing and Simpson removal grades of I and II were associated with a good outcome (p < 0.001). The length of hospitalization was significantly related to the outcome (p < 0.001). The complication rate was 14.3%. At 6-month follow-up, the mortality rate was 2.5%. The average cost was higher in patients with a pre-operative KPS score lower than 80. The outcome of intracranial-meningioma resection in elderly individuals is favorable when the pre-operative KPS score is >80. Treatment should be patient-specific, and additional factors should be considered. Patients with poor pre-operative clinical conditions might benefit from a combined strategy with partial resection and radiosurgery in order to reduce surgical timing and the complication rate.

Italian Neurosurgical Residents' Experience with Research Activities: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: In parallel with the progress in neurosurgery, improvements in residents' training strategies have been reported. Increasing focus has been placed on residents' participation in research. Previous studies analyzed neurosurgery residents' contributions to research activities, time dedicated to research, and outcomes. However, few studies investigating these aspects outside the United States are present in the literature. METHODS: A 3-section survey was sent to neurosurgery residents in Italy to determine the current opinion, perceptions, and experiences in the research field. A review of the pertinent literature was carried out. RESULTS: Ninety-seven responding residents (response rate of 41.5%) self-reported an average time spent on research of 9.7 ± 11.4 hours/week. In decreasing frequency, residents were working on retrospective cohort studies (27.5%), case reports (21.7%), case series (15.5%), prospective cohort studies (13.4%), and others (16.4%). The most commonly reported factors promoting interest in research were interaction with peers (76.3%), mentorship (70.1%), and conference exposure (52.6%). Reported strategies of program support were heterogeneous with a prevalence for established collaborative agreements (59.8%) and the presence of a study coordinator (37.1%). The most frequently cited limiting factors were regulatory paperwork (70.1%), call schedule (60.8%), and lack of participating students/residents (57.7%). CONCLUSIONS: By describing the current status of Italian residents' participation in research, we provide additional insight into factors supporting research involvement and existing barriers. Strategies for improvement at national and departmental levels are suggested. We encourage further investigations in other countries, to provide useful information in a worldwide framework.