Preclinical Assessment of a New Hybrid Compound C11 Efficacy on Neurogenesis and Cognitive Functions after Pilocarpine Induced Status Epilepticus in Mice.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent medical emergency that can lead to a variety of neurological disorders, including cognitive impairment and abnormal neurogenesis. The aim of the presented study was the in vitro evaluation of potential neuroprotective properties of a new pyrrolidine-2,5-dione derivatives compound C11, as well as the in vivo assessment of the impact on the neurogenesis and cognitive functions of C11 and levetiracetam (LEV) after pilocarpine (PILO)-induced SE in mice. The in vitro results indicated a protective effect of C11 (500, 1000, and 2500 ng/mL) on astrocytes under trophic stress conditions in the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) test. The results obtained from the in vivo studies, where mice 72 h after PILO SE were treated with C11 (20 mg/kg) and LEV (10 mg/kg), indicated markedly beneficial effects of C11 on the improvement of the neurogenesis compared to the PILO control and PILO LEV mice. Moreover, this beneficial effect was reflected in the Morris Water Maze test evaluating the cognitive functions in mice. The in vitro confirmed protective effect of C11 on astrocytes, as well as the in vivo demonstrated beneficial impact on neurogenesis and cognitive functions, strongly indicate the need for further advanced molecular research on this compound to determine the exact neuroprotective mechanism of action of C11.

Assessment of the Combined Treatment with Umbelliferone and Four Classical Antiepileptic Drugs Against Maximal Electroshock-Induced Seizures in Mice.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of umbelliferone (7-hydroxycoumarin; UMB) on the anticonvulsant potency of four classical antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB) and valproate (VPA)) in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. RESULTS: UMB administered systemically intraperitoneally (ip) in a dose of 150 mg/kg significantly elevated the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions (p < 0.05) in mice. Moreover, UMB (150 mg/kg) co-administered with PB and VPA significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant potency of these drugs by reducing their median effective doses (ED50 values) from 35.39 to 21.78 mg/kg (p < 0.01) for PB, and from 281.4 to 215.5 mg/kg (p < 0.01) for VPA. In contrast, UMB (150 mg/kg, ip) had no significant effect on the antiseizure activity of CBZ and PHT in the mouse MES model. Neither total brain PB, nor total brain VPA concentrations were altered after ip administration of UMB, indicating a pharmacodynamic nature of interactions between the tested drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The selective potentiation of the anticonvulsant potency of PB and VPA by UMB, and lack of any pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs, make the combinations of UMB with PB or VPA worthy of consideration for epileptic patients who are refractory to standard antiepileptic treatment.