Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 28(10): 809-816, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31073091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT: Unnecessary laboratory testing leads to considerable healthcare costs. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), commonly ordered with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), commonly ordered with creatinine (Cr), often add little value to patient management at significant cost. We undertook a choosing wisely based quality improvement initiative to reduce the frequency of testing. OBJECTIVES: To reduce the ratio of AST/ALT and BUN/Cr to less than 5% for all inpatient and outpatient test orders. MEASURES: Absolute number and ratio of AST/ALT and BUN/Cr; AST, ALT, BUN and Cr tests per 100 hospital days; projected annualised cost savings and monthly acute inpatient bed days. IMPROVEMENTS: We created guidelines for appropriate indications of AST and BUN testing, provided education with audit and feedback and removed AST and BUN from institutional order sets. IMPACT/RESULTS: The ratios of AST/ALT and BUN/Cr decreased significantly over the study period (0.37 to 0.14, 0.57 to 0.14, respectively), although the goal of 0.05 was not achieved due to a delay in adopting the choosing wisely strategies during the study time period by some inpatient units. The number of tests per 100 hospital days decreased from 20 to 7 AST (95% CI 19 to 20.5, 5.6 to 8.7, p<0.001) and from 72 to 17 BUN (95% CI 70 to 73.4, 16.6 to 22.9, p<0.001). The initiative resulted in a projected annualised cost savings of C$221 749. DISCUSSION: A significant decrease in the AST/ALT and BUN/Cr ratios can be achieved with a multimodal approach and will result in substantial healthcare savings.


Assuntos
Aspartato Aminotransferases , Nitrogênio da Ureia Sanguínea , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/normas , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Comitês Consultivos , Alanina Transaminase , Canadá , Creatinina , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 10(10): 1767-72, 2015 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26408550

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concerns have been raised about nephrology fellows' skills in inserting temporary hemodialysis catheters. Less is known about temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills of attending nephrologists supervising these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare baseline temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills of attending nephrologists with the skills of nephrology fellows before and after a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This pre- post-intervention study with a pretest-only comparison group was conducted at the University of Toronto in September of 2014. Participants were nephrology fellows and attending nephrologists from three university-affiliated academic hospitals who underwent baseline assessment of internal jugular temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills using a central venous catheter simulator. Fellows subsequently completed an SBML intervention, including deliberate practice with the central venous catheter simulator. Fellows were expected to meet or exceed a minimum passing score at post-test. Fellows who did not meet the minimum passing score completed additional deliberate practice. Attending nephrologist and fellow baseline performance on the temporary hemodialysis catheter skills assessment was compared. Fellows' pre- and post-test temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion performance was compared to assess the effectiveness of SBML. The skills assessment was scored using a previously published 28-item checklist. The minimum passing score was set at 79% of checklist items correct. RESULTS: In total, 19 attending nephrologists and 20 nephrology fellows participated in the study. Mean attending nephrologist checklist scores (46.1%; SD=29.5%) were similar to baseline scores of fellows (41.1% items correct; SD=21.4%; P=0.55). Only two of 19 attending nephrologists (11%) met the minimum passing score at baseline. After SBML, fellows' mean post-test score improved to 91.3% (SD=6.9%; P<0.001). Median time between pre- and post-test was 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Attending nephrologists' baseline temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills were highly variable and similar to nephrology fellows' skills, with only a small minority able to competently insert a temporary hemodialysis catheter. SBML was extremely effective for training fellows and should be considered for attending nephrologists who supervise temporary hemodialysis catheter insertions.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/normas , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Nefrologia/educação , Treinamento por Simulação , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Lista de Checagem , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Veias Jugulares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA