Economic burden of nonadherence to standards of diabetes care.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of nonadherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines on health care expenditures for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional cohort design, utilizing 2016-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of T2D who completed the supplemental T2D care survey were included in the study. Participants were categorized based on adherence to the 10 processes in the ADA guidelines into adherent (≥ 9 processes) and nonadherent (≤ 6 processes) categories. Propensity score matching was employed using a logistic regression model. After matching, total annual health care expenditure change from baseline year was compared using a t test. Further, imbalanced variables were controlled for in a multivariable linear regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1619 patients representing 15,781,346 (SE = 438,832) individuals met the inclusion criteria, among whom 12.17% received nonadherent care. After propensity matching, those who received nonadherent care had $4031 higher total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year, whereas patients who received adherent care had $128 lower total annual health care expenditures compared with their baseline year. Further, multivariable linear regression adjusted for the imbalanced variables indicated that nonadherent care was associated with a mean (SE) $3470 ($1588) increase in the change from baseline health care expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to the ADA guidelines results in a significant increase in health care expenditures among patients with diabetes. The economic impact of nonadherent care for T2D is a significant and extensive issue that needs to be addressed. These findings emphasize the importance of providing care based on ADA guidelines.

Incremental health care expenditures for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in comparison with other cancers: Analysis of national survey data.

BACKGROUND: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is among the most common cancers in the United States, with an estimated annual incidence of more than 80,000 and a high survival rate. However, limited national data exist regarding the health care burden of NHL. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incremental health care expenditures among patients with NHL using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data compared with patients with other cancers. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study included all patients with NHL (≥ 18 years) and all individuals diagnosed with other cancers from the MEPS 2014-2019. The components of health care expenditures included hospital inpatient care, office-based visits, outpatient care, emergency department, prescription medications, dental, home health, and other expenditures. Patients with NHL and those diagnosed with other cancers were identified from the full-year consolidated MEPS Household Component 2014-2019. Descriptive weighted analysis was used to compare the health care expenditure components between individuals with NHL and all other cancers. A 2-part model using probit and generalized linear models with a log link function was used to estimate the incremental increase in total health care expenditures for NHL compared with all other cancers. RESULTS: According to the MEPS, there were 0.74 million patients with NHL (95% CI = 0.62-0.86) and 27.91 million patients with other cancers (95% CI = 26.69-29.13) annually. Most of the patients with NHL were White (78.36%), male (60.67%), and older than 65 years (45.8%). The unadjusted analysis indicated a total annual expenditure of $21,698 (95% CI = $16,752-$26,645) for NHL, which was significantly higher than the annual expenditure for patients with other cancers ($15,029 [95% CI = $14,476-$15,582]). Most of the total health expenditure of both the NHL group and the other cancers group was distributed in 3 categories of hospital inpatient care (29.15% vs 26.29%), office-based visits (28.10% vs 25.08%), and prescription medications (19.03% vs 22.57%). Based on the 2-part model adjusted for all covariates, the annual health care expenditure for NHL was $7,284 (95% CI = $1,432-$13,135), higher than the expenditure of patients diagnosed with all other cancers. Among the health care expenditure components, the office-based visits were $2,641 higher for patients with NHL compared with the other cancers group (95% CI = $1,129-$4,153). CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of NHL is higher compared with other cancers. Most of the NHL expenditures were attributable to hospital inpatient services and office-based visits. The study findings can inform value-based care considerations because of a better understanding of utilization and care patterns for NHL. DISCLOSURES: Dr Aparasu has received research funding from Astellas Inc., Incyte Corp., Gilead, and Novartis Inc. for projects unrelated to the current work. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article. We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.