Metrics and definitions used in the assessment of cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review: 1) degree of conformity to the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) among studies that used a NB, 2) review definitions of cognitive impairment (CI) from studies that used a NB, and 3) characterize measurement tools used to assess CI in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO for articles on CI in adult SLE patients. We reviewed studies that used a NB and compared their tests to the ACR-NB to assess the degree of conformity. Definitions of CI from studies that used a NB were reviewed when sufficient information was available. We reviewed and categorized CI measurement tools into four broad categories: NB, screening, incomplete/mixed batteries, and computerized batteries. RESULTS: Of 8727 references, 118 were selected for detailed review and 97 were included in the final analysis. Of 43 studies that used a NB, none of the studies used the ACR-NB exactly as published. Many studies supplemented with other tests. Overall, there was inconsistent use of ACR-NB tests. Definitions for CI varied, with cut-offs ranging from 1 to 3 standard deviations below normative values on domains/tests varying in type and number. The most frequently used measurement tool for assessing CI in SLE was a NB. Use of screening tests and computerized batteries have also increased over the last decade. CONCLUSION: The assessment and definition of CI in SLE remains heterogeneous. A consensus meeting to address existing inconsistencies should be considered to harmonize the field of CI in SLE.

Identifying a Response for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity 2000 Glucocorticoid Index.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and the SLEDAI-2K Glucocorticoids (SLEDAI-2KG) indices in identifying responders to standard of care therapy. METHODS: Data from adult patients seen between 1995 and 2018 at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic were analyzed. Patients with active disease (SLEDAI-2K score ≥6) and receiving prednisone ≥5 mg/day, and with a follow-up visit at 9 months, were studied. Response to standard of care therapy at first follow-up visit was assessed using the SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG. The performances of the SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG were compared using a cutoff point of 4. RESULTS: In a cohort of 188, the majority of patients were female (86.0%) and White (47.9%). Of 188 patients, 145 (77.1%) were responders and had a decrease in SLEDAI-2K score of ≥4. The SLEDAI-2KG identified 142 (97.9%) responders among the SLEDAI-2K responders. More importantly, the SLEDAI-2KG identified 11 (25.6%) additional responders among SLEDAI-2K nonresponders (n = 43). This resulted from the ability of the SLEDAI-2KG to account for the decrease in glucocorticoids dose. CONCLUSION: The SLEDAI-2KG provides a novel concept for the assessment of lupus disease activity while accounting for glucocorticoids dosage to reflect on disease activity overall at a particular visit. The SLEDAI-2KG accounts for the disease activity for each descriptor while also accounting for the current glucocorticoids dosage. The SLEDAI-2KG adds 1 additional variable (glucocorticoids dosage) to the SLEDAI-2K, which could alter response rates in drug trials and observational studies.

Validity Evidence for the Use of Automated Neuropsychologic Assessment Metrics As a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) conventionally relies on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) neuropsychologic battery (NB), which is not universally available. To develop a more accessible screening approach, we assessed validity of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). Using the ACR NB as the gold standard for cognitive impairment classification, the objectives were 1) to measure overall discriminative validity of the ANAM for cognitive impairment versus no cognitive impairment, 2) to identify ANAM subtests and scores that best differentiate patients with cognitive impairment from those with no cognitive impairment, and 3) to derive ANAM composite indices and cutoffs. METHODS: A total of 211 consecutive adult patients, female and male, with SLE were administered the ANAM and ACR NB. 1) For overall discriminative validity of the ANAM, we compared patients with cognitive impairment versus those with no cognitive impairment on 4 scores. 2) Six ANAM models using different scores were developed, and the most discriminatory subtests were selected using logistic regression analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to establish ANAM validity against the ACR NB. 3) ANAM composite indices and cutoffs were derived for the best models, and sensitivities and specificities were calculated. RESULTS: Patients with no cognitive impairment performed better on most ANAM subtests, supporting ANAM's discriminative validity. Cognitive impairment could be accurately identified by selected ANAM subtests with top models, demonstrating excellent AUCs of 81% and 84%. Derived composite indices and cutoffs demonstrated sensitivity of 78-80% and specificity of 70%. CONCLUSION: This study provides support for ANAM's discriminative validity for cognitive impairment and utility for cognitive screening in adult SLE. Derived composite indices and cutoffs enhance clinical applicability.

Area-based socioeconomic disparities in mortality due to unintentional injury and youth suicide in British Columbia, 2009-2013. / Disparités socioéconomiques et spatiales dans les décès attribuables au suicide chez les jeunes et aux blessures non intentionnelles en Colombie-Britannique (2009-2013).

INTRODUCTION: The association between health outcomes and socioeconomic status (SES) has been widely documented, and mortality due to unintentional injuries continues to rank among the leading causes of death among British Columbians. This paper quantified the SES-related disparities in the mortality burden of three British Columbia's provincial injury prevention priority areas: falls among seniors, transport injury, and youth suicide. METHODS: Mortality data (2009 to 2013) from Vital Statistics and dissemination area or local health area level socioeconomic data from CensusPlus 2011 were linked to examine age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) and disparities in ASMRs of unintentional injuries and subtypes including falls among seniors (aged 65+) and transport-related injuries as well as the intentional injury type of youth suicide (aged 15 to 24). Disparities by sex and geography were examined, and relative and absolute disparities were calculated between the least and most privileged areas based on income, education, employment, material deprivation, and social deprivation quintiles. RESULTS: Our study highlighted significant sex differences in the mortality burden of falls among seniors, transport injury, and youth suicide with males experiencing significantly higher mortality rates. Notable geographic variations in overall unintentional injury ASMR were also observed across the province. In general, people living in areas with lower income and higher levels of material deprivation had increasingly higher mortality rates compared to their counterparts living in more privileged areas. CONCLUSION: The significant differences in unintentional and intentional injury-related mortality outcomes between the sexes and by SES present opportunities for targeted prevention strategies that address the disparities.