Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion.

INTRODUCTION: As scholarship moves into the digital sphere, applicant and promotion and tenure (P&T) committee members lack formal guidance on evaluating the impact of digital scholarly work. The P&T process requires the appraisal of individual scholarly impact in comparison to scholars across institutions and disciplines. As dissemination methods evolve in the digital era, we must adapt traditional P&T processes to include emerging forms of digital scholarship. METHODS: We conducted a blended, expert consensus procedure using a nominal group process to create a consensus document at the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Academic Assembly on April 1, 2019. RESULTS: We discussed consensus guidelines for evaluation and promotion of digital scholarship with the intent to develop specific, evidence-supported recommendations to P&T committees and applicants. These recommendations included the following: demonstrate scholarship criteria; provide external evidence of impact; and include digital peer-review roles. As traditional scholarship continues to evolve within the digital realm, academic medicine should adapt how that scholarship is evaluated. P&T committees in academic medicine are at the epicenter for supporting this changing paradigm in scholarship. CONCLUSION: P&T committees can critically appraise the quality and impact of digital scholarship using specific, validated tools. Applicants for appointment and promotion should highlight and prepare their digital scholarship to specifically address quality, impact, breadth, and relevance. It is our goal to provide specific, timely guidance for both stakeholders to recognize the value of digital scholarship in advancing our field.

Communication, learning and assessment: Exploring the dimensions of the digital learning environment.

Advances in technology make it possible to supplement in-person teaching activities with digital learning, use electronic records in patient care, and communicate through social media. This relatively new "digital learning environment" has changed how medical trainees learn, participate in patient care, are assessed, and provide feedback. Communication has changed with the use of digital health records, the evolution of interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication, and the emergence of social media. Learning has evolved with the proliferation of online tools such as apps, blogs, podcasts, and wikis, and the formation of virtual communities. Assessment of learners has progressed due to the increasing amounts of data being collected and analyzed. Digital technologies have also enhanced learning in resource-poor environments by making resources and expertise more accessible. While digital technology offers benefits to learners, the teachers, and health care systems, there are concerns regarding the ownership, privacy, safety, and management of patient and learner data. We highlight selected themes in the domains of digital communication, digital learning resources, and digital assessment and close by providing practical recommendations for the integration of digital technology into education, with the aim of maximizing its benefits while reducing risks.

Identifying Gaps and Launching Resident Wellness Initiatives: The 2017 Resident Wellness Consensus Summit.

INTRODUCTION: Burnout, depression, and suicidality among residents of all specialties have become a critical focus for the medical education community, especially among learners in graduate medical education. In 2017 the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) updated the Common Program Requirements to focus more on resident wellbeing. To address this issue, one working group from the 2017 Resident Wellness Consensus Summit (RWCS) focused on wellness program innovations and initiatives in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. METHODS: Over a seven-month period leading up to the RWCS event, the Programmatic Initiatives workgroup convened virtually in the Wellness Think Tank, an online, resident community consisting of 142 residents from 100 EM residencies in North America. A 15-person subgroup (13 residents, two faculty facilitators) met at the RWCS to develop a public, central repository of initiatives for programs, as well as tools to assist programs in identifying gaps in their overarching wellness programs. RESULTS: An online submission form and central database of wellness initiatives were created and accessible to the public. Wellness Think Tank members collected an initial 36 submissions for the database by the time of the RWCS event. Based on general workplace, needs-assessment tools on employee wellbeing and Kern's model for curriculum development, a resident-based needs-assessment survey and an implementation worksheet were created to assist residency programs in wellness program development. CONCLUSION: The Programmatic Initiatives workgroup from the resident-driven RWCS event created tools to assist EM residency programs in identifying existing initiatives and gaps in their wellness programs to meet the ACGME's expanded focus on resident wellbeing.

Matching capacity to demand: a regional dashboard reduces ambulance avoidance and improves accessibility of receiving hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: ambulance diversion is a dangerous repercussion of emergency department (ED) crowding and can reflect fragmentation and a lack of coordination in designating optimal patient offload sites for prehospital providers. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether proactive destination selection through the Regional Emergency Patient Access and Coordination (REPAC) program would enhance capacity and ED flow management. METHODS: the REPAC system provides a dashboard that synthesizes real-time capacity and acuity data for all three adult EDs in the city of Calgary, assigning a color code to reflect receiving status. It assigns destination for the next patient transported by emergency medical services (EMS) by categorizing ED sites as having either a favorable (green/yellow) status or unfavorable (orange/red) status. Three time windows were analyzed: a 6-month window prior to REPAC implementation (pre), the first 6-month window immediately following (post1), and the second 6-month period following (post2). Primary outcomes of interest were the proportion of time spent in favorable versus unfavorable status and EMS avoidances for all adult ED sites in the region (percentage of total time with any center on EMS bypass). Information on total number of ED visits, percentage of patients arriving by EMS transports, admission rates, patient acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Score), age, and length of stay (LOS) for admitted and discharged patients was collected. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed for primary outcome analysis. RESULTS: implementation of the REPAC system resulted in an increase in the proportion of total time region hospitals reported favorable status (57.5% vs. 64.1%) pre versus post1, an effect that was accentuated at 1 year (post2, 78.7%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). There was a concomitant decrease in EMS avoidances as a result of the REPAC system, 4.4% to 1.8% (pre vs. post1), also further improved at 1 year to 0.6% (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: proactive EMS destination selection through a real-time integrated electronic surveillance system enhances regional capacity and flow management while significantly reducing ambulance diversions.