Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(8): 1857-1866.e1, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Medico-economic data of patients suffering from chronic nausea and vomiting are lacking. In these patients, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an effective, but costly treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and medico-economic impact of Enterra therapy in patients with chronic medically refractory nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from patients with medically refractory nausea and/or vomiting, implanted with an Enterra device and followed for two years. Gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) score, vomiting frequency, nutritional status and safety were evaluated. Direct and indirect expenditure data were prospectively collected in diaries. RESULTS: Complete clinical data were available for142 patients (60 diabetic, 82 non-diabetic) and medico-economic data were available for 96 patients (36 diabetic, 60 non-diabetic), 24 months after implantation. GIQLI score increased by 12.1 ± 25.0 points (p < .001), with a more significant improvement in non-diabetic than in diabetic patients (+15.8 ± 25.0 points, p < .001 versus 7.3 ± 24.5 points, p = .027, respectively). The proportion of patients vomiting less than once per month increased by 25.5% (p < .001). Hospitalisations, time off work and transport were the main sources of costs. Enterra therapy decreased mean overall healthcare costs from 8873 US$ to 5525 US$ /patient/year (p = .001), representing a saving of 3348 US$ per patient and per year. Savings were greater for diabetic patients (4096 US$ /patient/year) than for non-diabetic patients (2900 US$ /patient/year). CONCLUSIONS: Enterra therapy is an effective, safe and cost-effective option for patients with refractory nausea and vomiting. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT00903799.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Gastroparesia , Estimulação Elétrica , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Estresse Financeiro , Esvaziamento Gástrico , Humanos , Náusea/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/etiologia , Vômito/terapia
2.
Dig Liver Dis ; 52(4): 408-413, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: According to infliximab (IFX) license in Crohn's disease (CD), infusion doses are based on patient's body-weight. Dose banding providing standardized doses (SD) has been implemented in parenteral chemotherapy in order to optimize aseptic unit capacity and reduce drug expenditure, duration of hospital stay and costs without decreasing efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The first part was a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive CD patients receiving IFX maintenance therapy to determine standardized doses covering more than 50% of infusions. The second part was a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of SD compared to body-weight doses (BWD) on admission duration and costs. RESULTS: Six IFX SD covering more than 90% of infusion doses were implemented for dose banding. According to the Monte-Carlo simulation, there was no significant difference between IFX SD and BWD maintenance regimens. When assessed prospectively in 116 patients (75 patients treated with SD and 41 with BWD) corresponding to 128 infusions, hospitalization duration was shortened by 70 min per patient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to a pharmacokinetic model, IFX SD has a pharmacokinetic profile close to BWD and is associated with reduced length of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with CD. IFX SD implementation could optimize infusion units functioning and, save time and costs without decreasing efficacy.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Medicamentos , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/administração & dosagem , Infliximab/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Redução de Custos , Doença de Crohn/economia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , França , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/economia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/farmacocinética , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infliximab/economia , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Infusões Intravenosas/normas , Masculino , Método de Monte Carlo , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Gut ; 68(11): 1928-1941, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375601

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery. DESIGN: We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous. RESULTS: Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett's oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis. CONCLUSION: With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Endoscopia , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/patologia , Humanos , Manometria , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica
4.
Clin Drug Investig ; 31(10): 703-15, 2011 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21756007

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Research on the negative impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) on the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and resource utilization of patients with persistent and intense GORD symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the population of patients with GORD with persistent moderate-to-severe symptoms despite ongoing PPI therapy, and to compare their HR-QOL and healthcare resource use with patients with low GORD symptom load during ongoing PPI therapy. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the 2007 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), PPI-compliant (≥22 days with PPI use in the past month) European (France, Germany and the UK) and US respondents with physician-diagnosed GORD were stratified into those with persistent and intense GORD symptoms, those with low symptom load, or an intermediate group. RESULTS: 5672 PPI-compliant respondents were identified (persistent and intense symptoms, n = 1741; low symptom load, n = 1805; intermediate group, n = 2126). Respondents with persistent and intense symptoms had poorer HR-QOL than patients with a low symptom load, but none of the differences were statistically significant. Respondents with persistent and intense symptoms also reported lower work productivity (all countries; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US), greater activity impairment (all countries; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US) and more hours missed from work due to health problems (US, UK and Germany; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US). In the UK and US, respondents with persistent and intense symptoms reported significantly more visits to both primary-care physicians and specialists than respondents with a low symptom load (all p < 0.01). Additionally, US respondents with persistent and intense symptoms reported significantly more emergency room visits (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The 2007 NHWS gives support to the hypothesis that persistent and intense GORD symptoms despite PPI therapy have a significant and negative impact on both HR-QOL and healthcare resource utilization. These findings outline the need for new treatment options for symptomatic GORD patients taking PPI therapy.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/psicologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resistência a Medicamentos , Feminino , França , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Alemanha , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Autorrelato , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
5.
J Hepatol ; 53(6): 1035-40, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20801541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although methotrexate (MTX) is used in the effective treatment of inflammatory disorders, its use is hampered by the risk of liver fibrosis. Non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, such as transient elastography (FibroScan) and FibroTest could be useful for monitoring MTX-liver toxicity. The aim of this case-control study was to determine factors associated with liver fibrosis in a large cohort of patients requiring MTX. METHODS: Consecutive adults with various benign inflammatory diseases were prospectively assessed using FibroScan and FibroTest when they were treated with MTX (cases) or before beginning treatment (controls). RESULTS: Among 518 included patients, 44 patients (8.5%) had FibroScan and/or FibroTest results suggesting severe liver fibrosis. In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with abnormal markers of liver fibrosis were the body mass index >28 kg/m(2) and high alcohol consumption. Neither long MTX duration nor cumulative doses were associated with elevated FibroScan or FibroTest results. CONCLUSIONS: Severe liver fibrosis is a rare event in patients treated with MTX and is probably unrelated to the total dose. Patients with other risk factors for liver disease should be closely monitored with non-invasive methods before and during MTX treatment.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade/métodos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aspartato Aminotransferases/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biópsia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Cirrose Hepática/induzido quimicamente , Testes de Função Hepática/métodos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA