Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and low transvalvular flow, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is recommended to determine AS severity, whereas the degree of aortic valve calcification (AVC) supposedly correlates with AS severity according to current European and American guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between AVC and AS severity as determined using echocardiography and DSE in patients with aortic valve area <1 cm2 and peak aortic valve velocity <4.0 m/s. METHODS: All patients underwent DSE to determine AS severity and multislice computed tomography to quantify AVC. Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic value of AVC for AS severity grading as determined using echocardiography and DSE in men and women. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were included. Median age was 78 years (25th-75th percentile: 71-84 years) and 25% were women. Left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced (<50%) in 197 (92.1%) patients. Severe AS was diagnosed in 106 patients (49.5%). Moderate AS was diagnosed in 108 patients (50.5%; in 77 based on resting transthoracic echocardiography, in 31 confirmed using DSE). AVC score was high (≥2,000 for men or ≥1,200 for women) in 47 (44.3%) patients with severe AS and in 47 (43.5%) patients with moderate AS. AVC sensitivity was 44.3%, specificity was 56.5%, and positive and negative predictive values for severe AS were 50.0% and 50.8%, respectively. Area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.508 for men and 0.524 for women. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-slice computed tomography-derived AVC scores showed poor discrimination between grades of AS severity using DSE and cannot replace DSE in the diagnostic work-up of low-gradient severe AS.

Incidence and Risk Assessment of Infolding Using Self-Expandable Devices in TAVR.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an evolving interventional therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Infolding (INF) as wrinkling along the valve frame is only seen in self-expandable transcatheter valves or surgical sutureless prostheses and is known to be a very rare event during delivery but probably underreported. Therefore, we aimed to (1) determine the frequency of events, (2) identify potential predictors of INF, and (3) evaluate the potential clinical impact of this adverse event. Methods: INF cases of 2 centers were retrospectively analyzed in an all-comer cohort of 1416 patients with older- and newer-generation self-expandable (SEV) devices. The underlying functional, anatomical, and procedural conditions were evaluated by univariate analysis. Results: INF+ was observed in 14 patients (1.0%) with the following valve size distribution: SEV-26: 14.3%, SEV-29: 28.6%, and SEV-34: 57.4%. Several dependent predictors of INF were pointed out, such as severe peripheral kinking, severe aortic calcification, resheathing maneuvers, valve-in-valve procedures, and the use of the largest valve size. INF+ patients showed a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (INF- vs. INF+: 12.3% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.008), of a new atrioventricular block (INF- vs. INF+: 14.8% vs. 42.9%; p = 0.003), and a higher need of permanent pacemaker implantation (INF- vs. INF+: 14.9% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.031). Conclusions: Identifying potential predictors of INF can probably influence the implantation strategy and improve safety algorithms and clinical outcomes. Even being a rare but potentially life-threatening and underreported event, safety rules must be established when expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement treatment to younger patients.

TAVR-related echocardiographic assessment - status quo, challenges and perspectives.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an emerging and a well-established procedure for high-risk and inoperable patients worldwide. Recent studies revealed furthermore that TAVR is equal or even superior to surgical valve replacement in intermediate risk patients. Therefore, a successful procedure is not only dependent on precise preprocedural patient selection but also on careful intraprocedural multimodal imaging guidance and adequate postprocedural follow-up. Up to date, 2D/3D transthoracic and/or transoesophageal echocardiography is an easy and goal-oriented tool for periprocedural TAVR-assessment regarding annulus measurements, cardiac function and concomitant valve diseases. Further procedural success is directly related to prevention of severe early and late complications. Thus, a careful intra- and postprocedural echocardiographic guidance is crucial to evaluate prosthetic function, position and its haemodynamic implication and changes in the integrity of the left ventricle during intra- and postprocedural management. We explored the role of echocardiography for pre-, intra- and postprocedural TAVR-assessment, illustrated by cases and possible algorithms, in a comprehensive literature review. Furthermore, we describe the role of fusion imaging, that is, real-time fusion of transoesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy (EchoNavigator Release System® I and II) during TAVR.

Interaction of increasing ICU survival and admittance policies in patients with hematologic neoplasms: A single center experience with 304 patients.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the development of ICU survival of patients with hematopoietic malignancies and discussed changes in admittance policies. METHOD: We compared 166 patients treated between 2009 and 2012 with 138 patients treated between 2013 and 2016. Patient characteristics and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: ICU survival was 45.2% in the first group and 66.7% in the second (P < 0.0005). Infection (P = 0.033), invasive ventilation (IMV) (P = 0.014) and SOFA score at day 3 (SOFA-48h) (P = 0.007) independently indicated worse ICU survival in the first group, IMV (P = 0.013) and SOFA-48h (P = 0.019) in the second group. The second group showed lower frequencies of infection (P = 0.003), IMV (P < 0.0005), need for vasopressors (P < 0.0005) and RRT (P = 0.021) at ICU admittance than the first. Further, the accumulation of hyperkaliemia, acidosis, low bicarbonate, high lactate and hypotension showed worse ICU survival in both groups and was lower in second group. CONCLUSION: ICU survival increased distinctly between 2009 and 2016. At ICU admittance, parameters showing severity of illness were less frequent in the second group. Our findings indicate general treatment improvements especially of infections and changes of admittance policies toward early ICU admittance during time.

Cost-comparison of third generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices in the German Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has a substantial impact on daily cardiovascular care delivery based on issues such as cost effectiveness and economic value within a restricted health care budget. Until now, potential financial benefits of third generation valve models have not been evaluated in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 204 eligible patients (Jan 2014-Sep 2016) who either received the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 (ES3) or the self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R (MER). Baseline information, procedural characteristics, 30-day outcome as well as in-hospital costs and reimbursement were collected and analyzed. The major cost driver was initial valve-kit costs with a significantly higher amount in the ES3 group, which was set at 0 with the lower price (ES3/MER: +4390.0€â€¯±â€¯3.807.0 vs. 0.0€â€¯±â€¯734.1; p < 0.01). However, initial valve-kit costs were balanced by additional material costs in the MER cohort. Overall costs did not differ significantly between valve models (ES3/MER: x + 13.808.0€â€¯±â€¯5.595.0 vs. x + 10.681.0€â€¯±â€¯4.518.0; p = 0.6885) and reimbursement was moderate (ES3/MER: 1.649.7€ vs. 4776.7€). CONCLUSION: Quality, success rate, and costs were comparable between third generation devices. Initial valve-kit costs were significantly higher in the ES3 group, whereas overall costs did not significantly differ between the two valve types.