EU-CaRE study: Could exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation also be cost-effective in elderly?

BACKGROUND: The role of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is well established in the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease. Unfortunately, the participation rates across Europe remain low, especially in elderly. The EU-CaRE RCT investigated the effectiveness of a home-based mobile CR programme in elderly patients that were not willing to participate in centre-based CR. The initial study concluded that a 6-month home-based mobile CR programme was safe and beneficial in improving VO2peak when compared with no CR. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a 6-month guided mobile CR programme is a cost-effective therapy for elderly patients who decline participation in CR. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a multicentre randomised clinical trial from November 11, 2015, to January 3, 2018, and follow-up was completed on January 17, 2019, in a secondary care system with 6 cardiac institutions across 5 European countries. A total of 179 patients who declined participation in centre-based CR and met the inclusion criteria consented to participate in the European Study on Effectiveness and Sustainability of Current Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in the Elderly trial. The data of patients (n = 17) that were lost in follow-up were excluded from this analysis. The intervention (n = 79) consisted of 6 months of mobile CR programme with telemonitoring, and coaching based on motivational interviewing to stimulate patients to reach exercise goals. Control patients did not receive any form of CR throughout the study period. The costs considered for the cost-effectiveness analysis of the RCT are direct costs 1) of the mobile CR programme, and 2) of the care utilisation recorded during the observation time from randomisation to the end of the study. Costs and outcomes (utilities) were compared by calculation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The healthcare utilisation costs (P = 0.802) were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the total costs were significantly higher in the intervention group (P = 0.040). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the primary endpoint VO2peak at 6 months was €1085 per 1-unit [ml/kg/min] improvement in change VO2peak and at 12 months it was €1103 per 1 unit [ml/kg/min] improvement in change VO2peak. Big differences in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the primary endpoint VO2peak at 6 months and 12 months were present between the adherent participants and the non-adherent participants. CONCLUSION: From a health-economic point of view the home-based mobile CR programme is an effective and cost-effective alternative for elderly cardiac patients who are not willing to participate in a regular rehabilitation programme to improve cardiorespiratory fitness. The change of QoL between the mobile CR was similar for both groups. Adherence to the mobile CR programme plays a significant role in the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Future research should focus on the determinants of adherence, on increasing the adherence of patients and the implementation of comprehensive home-based mobile CR programmes in standard care.

[Atrial fibrillation in Germany: A prospective cost of illness study]. / Vorhofflimmern in Deutschland--eine prospektive Krankheitskostenstudie.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and associated with a high risk of stroke, heart failure and hospitalization. This study examines the indication-specific costs of illness of AF patients in Germany. METHODS: The study was conducted nationwide with 54 general practitioners and internists, as well as 12 practicing cardiologists. The observational period per patient was one year. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. The study collected the annual direct indication-specific costs and additional patient relevant outcomes. RESULTS: Indication-specific services of 361 patients (age: 75, male: 55%) documented by general practitioners and internists cause average costs of 582 € per patient. The highest cost are caused by hospitalization (289 €), followed by outpatient treatment costs (151 €) and costs of anticoagulation with 52 € per patient. Additional consulting of a cardiologist (115 patients) causes average costs of 81 €. Assuming that a patient with AF is treated once a year by a resident cardiologist, the average annual cost amounted to 664 €. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospectively cost of illness analysis for AF patients under real life conditions in Germany indicate a high socio-economic burden of AF.

[Treatment of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without cardiac catheterization laboratory]. / Therapie des akuten ST-Streckenhebungs-Myokardinfarkts in Krankenhäusern mit und ohne Herzkatheterlabor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The goal of treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is to restore perfusion as soon as possible, preferably by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study of the German Myocardial Infarction Registry (DHR) was to document acute care and in-hospital course of STEMI patients in Germany. METHODS: Over three months patients with STEMI were consecutively included and their basic data, treatments and in-hospital complications were centrally recorded using an internet-based standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Included were 6,330 patients from 243 hospitals, in group 1 (primary admission in 136 hospitals with cath lab) 4,656 patients (74%) and in group 2 (primary admission in 107 hospitals without cath lab) 1,674 (26%). Reperfusion therapy was performed more frequently in patients of group 1 (91.1% PCI, 2.7% fibrinolysis) than in group 2 (80.7% PCI after transfer, 6.4% fibrinolysis). In-hospital mortality was 7.3% in all patients, 7.0% in group 1 and 8.3% in group 2. CONCLUSION: The DHR data show that about three quarters of patients with STEMI are primarily admitted to hospitals with cath labs. Primary PCI is the preferred treatment option both in hospitals with and without cath labs (in the latter after transfer); it is performed in about 85% of STEMI patients. In-hospital mortality is with over 7% higher in real-life than in randomized studies.

Two-year vascular hospitalisation rates and associated costs in patients at risk of atherothrombosis in France and Germany: highest burden for peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain Western European perspectives on the economic burden of atherothrombosis in patients with multiple risk factors only (MRF), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and in the under-evaluated group of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), we examined vascular-related hospitalisation rates and associated costs in France and Germany. DESIGN: The prospective REACH Registry enrolled 4693 patients in France, and 5594 patients in Germany (from December 2003 until June 2004). METHODS: For each country, 2-year rates and costs associated with cardiovascular events and vascular-related hospitalisations were examined for patients with MRF, CVD, CAD, and PAD. RESULTS: Two-year hospitalisation costs were highest for patients with PAD (3182.1€ for France; 2724.4€ for Germany) and lowest for the MRF group (749.1€ for France; 503.3€ for Germany). Peripheral revascularizations and amputations were the greatest contributors to costs for all risk groups. Across all PAD subgroups, peripheral procedures constituted approximately half of the 2-year costs. CONCLUSION: Hospitalisation rates and costs associated with atherothrombotic disease in France and Germany are high, especially so for patients with PAD.