Streptococcus pneumoniae serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility: assessment for vaccine efficacy in Canada after the introduction of PCV13.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be an important bacterial pathogen associated with invasive (e.g. bacteraemia, meningitis) and non-invasive (e.g. community-acquired respiratory tract) infections worldwide. Surveillance studies conducted nationally and globally assist in determining trends over geographical areas and allow comparisons between countries. OBJECTIVES: To characterize invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae in terms of their serotype, antimicrobial resistance, genotype and virulence and to use the serotype data to determine the level of coverage by different generations of pneumococcal vaccines. METHODS: SAVE (Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility: Assessment for Vaccine Efficacy in Canada) is an ongoing, annual, national collaborative study between the Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARE) and the National Microbiology Laboratory, focused on characterizing invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae obtained across Canada. Clinical isolates from normally sterile sites were forwarded by participating hospital public health laboratories to the Public Health Agency of Canada-National Microbiology Laboratory and CARE for centralized phenotypic and genotypic investigation. RESULTS: The four articles in this Supplement provide a comprehensive examination of the changing patterns of antimicrobial resistance and MDR, serotype distribution, genotypic relatedness and virulence of invasive S. pneumoniae obtained across Canada over a 10 year period (2011-2020). CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight the evolution of S. pneumoniae under pressure by vaccination and antimicrobial usage, as well as vaccine coverage, allowing both clinicians and researchers nationally and globally to view the current status of invasive pneumococcal infections in Canada.

Intravenous Fosfomycin: An Assessment of Its Potential for Use in the Treatment of Systemic Infections in Canada.

Fosfomycin is a bactericidal agent that inhibits cell wall synthesis using a mechanism of action distinct from ß-lactams or other antimicrobial agents. It is a broad-spectrum agent that is frequently active against antimicrobial-resistant bacterial pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae, and some isolates of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Intravenous fosfomycin has been prescribed for a wide variety of infections in many countries for >40 years. It is most frequently used in combination with other antimicrobial agents (e.g., ß-lactams, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides) and has an excellent safety profile, including in neonates and children, even with long-term administration (weeks). Fosfomycin achieves extensive tissue distribution including difficult to reach compartments such as aqueous humor, vitreous humor, abscess fluid, and CSF. Available data, to date, suggest no clinically relevant pharmacological interactions between fosfomycin and other agents, including drugs, stimulants, or food. Intravenous fosfomycin's role in therapy in Canada is likely as an agent used alone or in combination for complicated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients as well as hospitalized patients with MDR infections who have not responded to first-, and potentially, second-line antimicrobials or in patients who cannot tolerate (due to adverse effects) first- and second-line antimicrobials.

Introduction to the SAVE study (2011-15): Streptococcus pneumoniae serotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility: Assessment for Vaccine Efficacy in Canada after the introduction of PCV-13.

Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be an important bacterial pathogen associated with invasive (e.g. bacteraemia) and non-invasive (e.g. community-acquired respiratory tract) infections worldwide. Surveillance studies conducted nationally and globally can assist in determining trends across geographical areas and allow comparisons between countries. SAVE is an ongoing, annual, national study focused on characterizing invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae obtained across Canada. This Supplement documents the initial 5 years of the SAVE study (2011-15) during which 6207 invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae were evaluated. The three manuscripts in this Supplement provide a comprehensive examination of the changing patterns of invasive S. pneumoniae obtained across Canada over a 5 year period. The data highlight the evolution of S. pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance, serotype distribution, genotypic relatedness and virulence under pressure by vaccination and antimicrobial usage. This allows both clinicians and researchers nationally and globally to view the current status of invasive pneumococcal infections in Canada.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fosfomycin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Ontario.

Background and Objective. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics traditionally used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) is rising in Canada. We compared the cost-per-patient in Ontario of including fosfomycin (an antibiotic with a low resistance profile) as an option for first-line empirical treatment of uUTIs with current cost of treatment with sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, and nitrofurantoin. Methods. A decision-tree model was used to perform a cost-minimization analysis. All possible outcomes of a uUTI caused by bacterial species treated with either sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin were included. Results. In the base case analysis, the cost-per-patient for treating uUTI with fosfomycin was $105.12. This is similar to the cost-per-patient for each of the other currently reimbursed antibiotics (e.g., $96.19 for sulfonamides, $98.85 for fluoroquinolones, and $99.09 for nitrofurantoins). The weighted average cost-per-patient for treating uUTI was not substantially elevated with the inclusion of fosfomycin in the treatment landscape ($98.41 versus $98.29 with and without fosfomycin, resp.). The sensitivity analyses revealed that most (88.34%) of the potential variation in cost was associated with the probability of progressing to pyelonephritis and hospitalization for pyelonephritis. Conclusion. Fosfomycin in addition to being a safe and effective agent to treat uUTI has a low resistance profile, offers a single-dose treatment administration, and is similar in cost to other reimbursed antibiotics.

Assessment of multidrug resistance, clonality and virulence in non-PCV-13 Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes in Canada, 2011-13.

OBJECTIVES: Serotype replacement in Streptococcus pneumoniae following the implementation of a new vaccine has been associated with the emergence of non-vaccine serotypes as prominent causes of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). The aim of this study was to characterize specific non-PCV-13 serotypes 15A, 22F, 33F and 35B from IPD, isolated in Canada post-PCV-13 introduction in 2010. METHODS: Of 3802 IPD isolates collected from across Canada in 2011-13, 18.4% were found to be serotypes 15A, 22F, 33F and 35B. These 699 isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PFGE, MLST, molecular detection of pneumococcal pili and comparison with Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network (PMEN) clones. RESULTS: This study demonstrated clonal spread of specific STs, including MDR ST63 and its Sweden(15A)-25-related variants, the increasingly common ST433 and a variant of piliated, penicillin-non-susceptible ST558, related to PMEN clone Utah(35B)-24 (ST377). New STs of serotype 33F were identified. Several potential capsular switching events were identified within these serotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Non-PCV-13 serotype 22F is increasing in Canada through the rapid clonal expansion of ST433. Numerous new STs associated with serotype 33F indicate the potential divergence of the serotype. Serotypes 15A and 35B in Canada are related to international clones of S. pneumoniae.

Monte Carlo simulation analysis of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin pharmacodynamics against intensive care unit-isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The aim of the present study was to compare the potential of ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin to achieve their requisite pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to simulate the PK/PD indices of the investigated antimicrobials. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was estimated at minimum inhibitory concentration values ranging from 0.03 to 32 µg/mL to define the PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was computed using minimum inhibitory concentration data from the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit study. Analysis of the simulation results suggested the breakpoints of 4 µg/mL for ceftobiprole (500 mg/2 h t.i.d.), 0.25 µg/mL for dalbavancin (1000 mg), 0.12 µg/mL for daptomycin (4 mg/kg q.d. and 6 mg/kg q.d.) and tigecycline (50 mg b.i.d.), and 2 µg/mL for linezolid (600 mg b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1 g b.i.d. and 1.5 g b.i.d.). The estimated CFR were 100, 100, 70.6, 88.8, 96.5, 82.4, 89.4, and 98.3% for ceftobiprole, dalbavancin, daptomycin (4 mg/kg/day), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day), linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin (1 g b.i.d.) and vancomycin (1.5 g b.i.d.), respectively. In conclusion, ceftobiprole and dalbavancin have the highest probability of achieving their requisite PK/PD targets against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ICU settings. The susceptibility predictions suggested a reduction of the vancomycin breakpoint to 1 µg/mL.

Integrating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and MIC distributions to assess changing antimicrobial activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing infections in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD).

OBJECTIVES: To study antimicrobial pharmacodynamic (PD) activity over time against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Canadian hospitals. METHODS: Integrated pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD analyses with Monte Carlo simulations were used to study cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin and colistin. Profiles of P. aeruginosa infections were modelled using CANWARD data from January 2007 to June 2012 inclusive. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was the proportion of cases achieving a %ƒT>MIC ≥ 50% for cefepime, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, an ƒAUC/MIC ≥ 90 for ciprofloxacin and the aminoglycosides, and a total AUC/MIC ≥ 60 for colistin. RESULTS: Some 2126 P. aeruginosa isolates were identified. There were no significant trends over time in the PTA for cefepime (0.93-1.0), meropenem (0.89-0.92) or piperacillin/tazobactam (0.74-0.79) (data shown for the highest recommended doses). The PD activity for ciprofloxacin (PTA 0.48-0.64) was variable. There were notable improvements in the PTA for amikacin (from 0.21 to 0.55, P = 0.027), gentamicin (from 0.10 to 0.51, P = 0.035) and colistin (from 0.04 to ~0.20, P = 0.05), which were not reliably detected by MIC indices. There was a decline over time in the PTA for piperacillin/tazobactam from 0.73 to 0.61 against P. aeruginosa isolated from intensive care units (ICUs) (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.99, P = 0.003). Neither MIC50 nor MIC90 detected this reduction in PD activity. CONCLUSIONS: The overall PD activity against P. aeruginosa was stable from 2007 to 2012 for cefepime, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, was variable and unreliable for ciprofloxacin, and improved significantly but remained relatively low for the aminoglycosides and colistin. There was a progressive reduction over time in the PD activity of piperacillin/tazobactam against ICU isolates, which was not detected by simply assessing MIC indices.

Assessment of the activity of ceftaroline against clinical isolates of penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated MICs of ceftaroline using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the pharmacodynamics of ceftaroline against penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated MICs of ceftaroline using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. METHODS: Nine isolates of S. pneumoniae, including one penicillin-susceptible isolate, one penicillin-intermediate isolate and seven penicillin-resistant isolates, were tested. The pharmacodynamic model was inoculated with a concentration of 1 × 10(6) cfu/mL and ceftaroline was dosed twice daily (at 0 and 12 h) to simulate the fC(max) (maximum free concentration in serum) and t(1/2) (half-life in serum) obtained after 600 mg intravenous doses every 12 h (fC(max), 16 mg/L; t(1/2), 2.6 h). Ceftaroline was compared with ceftriaxone dosed once daily to simulate the fC(max) and t(1/2) obtained after a 1 g dose (fC(max), 18 mg/L; t(1/2), 8.0 h). Samples were collected over 24 h to assess viable growth and possible changes in ceftaroline MICs over time. RESULTS: Ceftaroline fT(>MIC) (time of free serum concentration over the MIC) of 100% (ceftaroline MICs, ≤ 0.5 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥ 3 log(10) killing) against all isolates at 6 h and completely eradicated all organisms at 12 and 24 h. No bacterial regrowth occurred over the study period and no changes in ceftaroline MICs were observed. Upon ceftriaxone exposure, S. pneumoniae isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 0.12 and 0.25 mg/L were eradicated, but isolates with ceftriaxone MICs of 1-8 mg/L resulted in initial bacterial reduction at 6 h with organism regrowth at 12 h and no reduction in organism concentration, relative to the starting inoculum, at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline fT(>MIC) of 100% (ceftaroline MICs, ≤ 0.5 mg/L) was bactericidal (≥ 3 log(10) killing) and eradicated all S. pneumoniae at 12 and 24 h with no regrowth.

Pharmacodynamics of empirical antibiotic monotherapies for an intensive care unit (ICU) population based on Canadian surveillance data.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, using Monte Carlo simulation, the pharmacodynamics (PD) of empirical antibiotic monotherapies for serious infections consistent with Canadian intensive care unit (ICU) surveillance data. METHODS: Meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, along with ceftobiprole, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), were tested at standard and highest recommended doses with and without prolonged infusion times (t'). Population pharmacokinetic models were used to simulate antibiotic serum concentrations (n = 5000). Cumulative target attainment (CTA) at >50%, >75% and 100% fT( > MIC) (percentage of time free concentrations exceed the MIC) targets were determined based on ICU surveillance data including 4798 pathogens, most commonly methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (20.1%), Escherichia coli (15.2%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.3%). RESULTS: With standard doses, ceftobiprole (500 mg every 8 h, t' 2 h) had 0.90 CTA at the >50% fT( > MIC) target while meropenem (1 g every 8 h, t' 0.5 h), piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h, t' 0.5 h) and cefepime (2 g every 12 h, t' 0.5 h) reached >50% fT( > MIC) in 0.79-0.82 of the population (0.84-0.88 when MRSA was excluded). Piperacillin/tazobactam had the largest reduction in CTA at the >75% and 100% fT( > MIC) targets requiring prolonged infusions to maintain comparable PD. For all agents, prolonged infusions and/or high doses were required to achieve >0.9 CTA at the lowest target, to reach higher targets or to cover less susceptible pathogens such as P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important comparative data on empirical antibiotic monotherapies in an ICU setting including preliminary data on ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole was most active overall, but similar to meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam (lowest target only) and cefepime when MRSA was excluded. Prolonged infusions in particular and high doses were effective at improving antibiotic PD.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment potential of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin in serum and epithelial lining fluid of community-acquired pneumonia patients with penicillin-susceptible, intermediate, and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the probability of target attainment (PTA) for macrolides and ketolides against penicillin-susceptible, intermediate, and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in both serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the attainment of the bacterial eradication-linked pharmacodynamic index of the free drug area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC(0-24)/MIC90) by azithromycin, clarithromycin, and telithromycin, at therapeutic doses, against penicillin-susceptible, intermediate, and resistant S. pneumoniae. RESULTS: In serum, azithromycin and clarithromycin were found to have a probability of attaining the recommended fAUC(0-24)/MIC90 ratio of 30 in 50.2% and 74.6%, respectively, of CAP patients with penicillin-intermediate strains, and a probability of 36.9% and 60.7%, respectively, in cases of penicillin-resistant strains. Telithromycin maintained a probability of reaching the fAUC(0-24)/MIC90 ratio of 30 in serum and ELF in 89.1% of CAP patients, regardless of the penicillin resistance of the strain. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin results in a higher PTA than azithromycin in the treatment of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, but both of these agents exhibit a decreasing efficacy as S. pneumoniae penicillin resistance increases. When compared to clarithromycin and azithromycin, telithromycin maintains higher PTA in CAP patients with penicillin-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae.

Comparative pharmacodynamics of garenoxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: a Monte Carlo simulation analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study used Monte Carlo simulations to assess the potential for attainment of pharmacodynamic targets with the fluoroquinolones garenoxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) from hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Data on the free AUC over 24 hours (fAUC(0-24)), a measure of drug exposure, were derived from previously described population pharmacokinetic models for therapeutic doses of the 3 fluoroquinolones. MIC distribution data for S pneumoniae were obtained from the Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study. These data were used to produce the ratio of fAUC(0-24) to the MIC(90) (fAUC(0-24)/MIC(90)), a pharmacodynamic predictor of bacterial eradication. Monte Carlo simulations were used to analyze the potential for garenoxacin 400 mg QD, gemifloxacin 320 mg QD, and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD to achieve target fAUC(0-24)/MIC(90) ratios of 30, 40, 100, and 120 against S pneumoniae in serum and ELF from hospitalized patients with CAP. Target ratios of 30 and 40 were used to assess the probability of bacterial eradication, while ratios of 100 and 120 were used to assess the probability of preventing development of resistance. RESULTS: Monte Carlo simulations indicated that all 3 fluoroquinolones had a high probability (>90%) of attaining target fAUC(0-24)/MIC(90) ratios of 30 and 40 against S pneumoniae in both serum and ELF. Garenoxacin 400 mg QD was associated with a >95% probability of achieving target fAUC(0-24)/MIC(90) ratios of 100 and 120 in both serum and ELF. Both gemifloxacin 320 mg QD and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD were associated with high probabilities of attaining fAUC(0-24)/MIC(90) ratios of 100 and 120 in ELF (>95%); the probability of gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin attaining these targets in serum ranged from 78.3% to 88.0%. CONCLUSION: Based on these simulations, garenoxacin 400 mg QD, gemifloxacin 320 mg QD, and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD appeared likely to achieve target serum and ELF concentrations against S pneumoniae in hospitalized patients with CAP, with a low potential to select for resistance.

Comparison of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administered at various dosing regimens to hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia: pharmacodynamic target attainment study using North American surveillance data for Streptococcus pneumoniae.

This work aimed at determining the target attainment potential of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in specific age-related patient populations such as elderly (> or =65 years) versus younger (<65 years) hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previously described population pharmacokinetic models of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin administration in patients with serious CAP were utilised to simulate gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic simulations and susceptibility data for Streptococcus pneumoniae from the ongoing national surveillance study, Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study (CROSS), were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of free-drug area under the curve over 24h relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)). Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment both of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin to achieve free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all)> or =30 against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Dosing regimens for gatifloxacin were 400 mg once daily (qd) administered to younger patients (<65 years) and gatifloxacin 200 mg qd to elderly patients (> or =65 years). Dosing regimens for levofloxacin were simulated as 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg qd administered to elderly patients as well as younger patients. Monte Carlo simulations using gatifloxacin 400mg against S. pneumoniae yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 96.6% for all patients, 92.3% for younger patients and 97.7% for elderly patients. When administered to elderly patients, a reduced dose of gatifloxacin 200mg qd could achieve a target attainment potential of 91.4%. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg qd yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 92.3% for all patients, 95.7% for elderly patients compared with 72.7% for younger patients. Using levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg qd had probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 of 97.0% and 98.3%, 98.1% and 99.2%, and 90.1% and 95.2% for all patients, elderly patients and younger patients, respectively. The probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 was low both with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin, except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg qd (78.5%). We conclude that gatifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Higher gatifloxacin/levofloxacin AUC and longer half-life (t(1/2)) values in elderly patients with CAP compared with younger patients provide better pharmacodynamic parameters (free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC) leading to a higher probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae. Gatifloxacin 400mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae both in young and elderly CAP patients. However, gatifloxacin administered at a lowered dose of 200 mg qd in elderly patients could still be successful in producing a favourable antibacterial effect. Levofloxacin administered at a dose of 750 mg qd results in a high probability of target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in all patients with CAP.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in patients with respiratory infections such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are poorly documented. This work aimed at assessing the pharmacodynamic target attainment against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg administered once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in elderly (>/=65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) hospitalized with CAP were simulated. Susceptibility data with S. pneumoniae from our ongoing national surveillance study (Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study-CROSS) were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all.) Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment of levofloxacin using doses of 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily to achieve free drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) >/= 30-100 versus S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin simulated after 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily dosing resulted in levofloxacin volume of distribution: elderly patients = younger patients, while levofloxacin clearance was: elderly patients < younger patients. Levofloxacin t(1/2) values were longer in elderly patients (9.8 +/- 2.5h) than younger patients with CAP (7.4 +/- 2.5h). Free levofloxacin AUC(0-24) as well as AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) for S. pneumoniae were higher in elderly patients than younger patients. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P and ELF (95.7% and 98.1%) in elderly and younger patients (72.7% and 80.6%) respectively. Levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily had probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P/ELF of 98.1%/98.6% and 99.2%/99.0%, respectively, in elderly patients compared with 89.9%/94.1% and 95.2%/96.5%, respectively, for younger patients. Probability of achieving of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 in P or ELF was very low in both patient populations at different doses except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg once daily P/ELF of 78.5%/87.0%. We conclude that levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid in patients with CAP including younger patients. Levofloxacin 500 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in elderly patients with CAP, although we favour the 750 mg dosing in these patients as well. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD results in high probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP.

Predictors of receipt of a fluoroquinolone versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of acute pyelonephritis in women in Manitoba, Canada.

PURPOSE: The increasing and comparatively high proportion of uropathogens in Canada resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may be partially responsible for the increasing use of fluoroquinolones. A number of patient-specific variables have been identified as risk factors for infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens. However, variables unrelated to need, have also been associated with receipt of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We identified patient variables associated with receipt of a fluoroquinolone versus TMP-SMX for treatment of acute pyelonephritis. METHODS: Healthcare claims from the province of Manitoba, Canada for the period February 1996 to March 1999 were examined to identify episodes of pyelonephritis in non-pregnant females between 18 and 65 years of age treated with TMP-SMX or a fluoroquinolone. Patient variables were identified based on healthcare claims review and data from Statistics Canada. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of receipt of a fluoroquinolone. RESULTS: A total of 1084 women met inclusion criteria; 653 treated with TMP-SMX and 431 treated with a fluoroquinolone. Age, income, rural residence, recent antibiotic use, recent hospitalization and presentation to an emergency room (ER) were positively associated with receipt of a fluoroquinolone. CONCLUSIONS: Patient variables reportedly associated with an increased probability of resistant organisms (e.g., age, recent antibiotic use and recent hospitalization) were significantly associated with an increased probability of receipt of fluoroquinolones. However, variables unrelated to antibiotic resistance (e.g., income, rural residence and presentation to an ER) were also significantly associated with receipt of a fluoroquinolone.

The ketolides: a critical review.

Ketolides are a new class of macrolides designed particularly to combat respiratory tract pathogens that have acquired resistance to macrolides. The ketolides are semi-synthetic derivatives of the 14-membered macrolide erythromycin A, and retain the erythromycin macrolactone ring structure as well as the D-desosamine sugar attached at position 5. The defining characteristic of the ketolides is the removal of the neutral sugar, L-cladinose from the 3 position of the ring and the subsequent oxidation of the 3-hydroxyl to a 3-keto functional group. The ketolides presently under development additionally contain an 11, 12 cyclic carbamate linkage in place of the two hydroxyl groups of erythromycin A and an arylalkyl or an arylallyl chain, imparting in vitro activity equal to or better than the newer macrolides. Telithromycin is the first member of this new class to be approved for clinical use, while ABT-773 is presently in phase III of development. Ketolides have a mechanism of action very similar to erythromycin A from which they have been derived. They potently inhibit protein synthesis by interacting close to the peptidyl transferase site of the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit. Ketolides bind to ribosomes with higher affinity than macrolides. The ketolides exhibit good activity against Gram-positive aerobes and some Gram-negative aerobes, and have excellent activity against drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, including macrolide-resistant (mefA and ermB strains of S. pneumoniae). Ketolides such as telithromycin display excellent pharmacokinetics allowing once daily dose administration and extensive tissue distribution relative to serum. Evidence suggests the ketolides are primarily metabolised in the liver and that elimination is by a combination of biliary, hepatic and urinary excretion. Pharmacodynamically, ketolides display an element of concentration dependent killing unlike macrolides which are considered time dependent killers. Clinical trial data are only available for telithromycin and have focused on respiratory infections including community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, sinusitis and streptococcal pharyngitis. Bacteriological and clinical cure rates have been similar to comparators. Limited data suggest very good eradication of macrolide-resistant and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae. As a class, the macrolides are well tolerated and can be used safely. Limited clinical trial data suggest that ketolides have similar safety profiles to the newer macrolides. Telithromycin interacts with the cytochrome P450 enzyme system (specifically CYP 3A4) in a reversible fashion and limited clinically significant drug interactions occur. In summary, clinical trials support the clinical efficacy of the ketolides in upper and lower respiratory tract infections caused by typical and atypical pathogens including strains resistant to penicillins and macrolides. Considerations such as local epidemiology, patterns of resistance and ketolide adverse effects, drug interactions and cost relative to existing agents will define the role of these agents. The addition of the ketolides in the era of antibacterial resistance provides clinicians with more options in the treatment of respiratory infections.

Ketolides in the treatment of respiratory infections.

The ketolides are a new class of macrolides specifically designed to combat respiratory tract pathogens that have acquired resistance to macrolides. The ketolides are semi-synthetic derivatives of the 14-membered macrolide erythromycin A. There are currently two ketolides in the late stages of clinical development in the US (telithromycin [HMR-364, Kelek; Aventis] and ABT-773 [Abbot Laboratories]), as well as newer compounds in earlier stages of testing. Ketolides have a mechanism of action very similar to that of erythromycin A. They potently inhibit protein synthesis by interacting close to the peptidyl transferase site of the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit. Ketolides bind to ribosomes with higher affinity than macrolides. The ketolides exhibit good activity against Gram-positive and some Gram-negative aerobes and have are active against macrolide-resistant Streptococcus species, including most mef A and erm B strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Ketolides have pharmacokinetics which allow once-daily dosing and extensive tissue distribution with very high uptake into respiratory tissues and fluids relative to serum. Evidence suggests the ketolides are primarily metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system in the liver and that elimination is a combination of biliary, hepatic and urinary excretion. Clinical trial data are only available for telithromycin and have focused on respiratory tract infections (RTIs) including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), sinusitis and streptococcal pharyngitis. Bacteriological and clinical cure rates have been similar to comparators. Ketolides have similar safety profiles to the newer macrolides. In summary, early clinical trials support the clinical efficacy of the ketolides in common RTIs, including activity against macrolide-resistant pathogens.

A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections.

The new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin) offer excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli and improved Gram-positive activity (e.g. against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin still maintains the best in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroides fragilis) versus ciprofloxacin. All of the new fluoroquinolones display excellent bioavailability and have longer serum half-lives than ciprofloxacin allowing for once daily dose administration. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones to each other or to standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of community-acquired respiratory infections (e.g. pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis). Limited data suggest that the new fluoroquinolones as a class may lead to better outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis versus comparators. Several of these agents have either been withdrawn from the market, had their use severely restricted because of adverse effects (clinafloxacin because of phototoxicity and hypoglycaemia; grepafloxacin because of prolongation of the QTc and resultant torsades de pointes; sparfloxacin because of phototoxicity; and trovafloxacin because of hepatotoxicity), or were discontinued during developmental phases. The remaining fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have adverse effect profiles similar to ciprofloxacin. Extensive post-marketing safety surveillance data (as are available with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) are required for all new fluoroquinolones before safety can be definitively established. Drug interactions are limited; however, all fluoroquinolones interact with metal ion containing drugs (eg. antacids). The new fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) offer several advantages over ciprofloxacin and are emerging as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Their broad spectrum of activity which includes respiratory pathogens such as penicillin and macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae, favourable pharmacokinetic parameters, good bacteriological and clinical efficacy will lead to growing use of these agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. These agents may result in cost savings especially in situations where, because of their potent broad-spectrum activity and excellent bioavailability, they may be used orally in place of intravenous antibacterials. Prudent use of the new fluoroquinolones will be required to minimise the development of resistance to these agents.