NUDT15 genetic testing-guided 6-mercaptopurine dosing in children with ALL likely to be cost-saving in China.

OBJECTIVE: The cost-effectiveness of NUDT15 genetic testing-guided initial 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) dosing in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was evaluated. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to evaluate the cost to China's medical system per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and cost per case of severe leukopenia avoided of NUDT15 genetic testing using public clinical data. RESULTS: Genetic testing-guided initial 6-MP dosing reduced overall costs by $518.61, and prevented 0.221 cases of Grade III-IV leukopenia and increased QALY by 0.00136 per patient. Results were robust in one-way analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: NUDT15 genetic testing prior to the initial administration of 6-MP in pediatric ALL patients in China is less expensive than standard dosing without genetic testing.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of CYP2D6*10 Pharmacogenetic Testing to Guide the Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor Positive Early Breast Cancer in China.

BACKGROUND: A CYP2D6 gene polymorphism is related to the effect of tamoxifen treatment in patient with estrogen-receptor positive (ER) positive breast cancer and CYP2D6*10 T/T can lead to a poor prognosis in Asian patients. Although one-off pharmacogenetic testing may optimize adjuvant endocrine therapy, testing prior to tamoxifen initiation incurs additional costs. AIM: We conducted a study to assess the cost-effectiveness of CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic testing to guide the adjuvant endocrine therapy compared with tamoxifen without CYP2D6*10 testing in China. METHODS: A semi-Markov model was developed to evaluate costs and health outcomes represented as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Input data were obtained from the public literature. The results were expressed as incremental cost per QALY gained. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis explored the impact of uncertainty in the model parameters on results, and probabilistic uncertainty was assessed through a Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, in the CYP2D6*10 testing and alternative adjuvant endocrine therapy group, the incremental total cost was US$17,966.95 and the incremental QALY was 3.582. Thus, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$5015.693 per QALY gained. Compared with a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$26,508/QALY in China, the CYP2D6*10 testing is the dominant strategy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer in China, and the increased cost of genetic testing was completely worthwhile. The sensitivity analyses showed that the model we built was quite stable. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic testing was cost effective for postmenopausal women with ER-positive early breast cancer.

CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided SERM could be a cost-effective strategy in Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of CYP2D6*10 genetic testing for the management of Chinese women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer treated with selective estrogen receptor modulator. Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Robustness of the model was addressed in one-way analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The cost of strategies of tamoxifen, toremifene without genotyping and the strategy base on CYP2D6*10 genotype were $63,879.19, $90,156.60 and $95,021.41, and the quality-adjusted life years gained are 8.1588, 12.89687 and 13.85911, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the CYP2D6*10 testing versus toremifene were 5,055.74221/quality-adjusted life year, respectively. Conclusion:CYP2D6*10 pharmacogenetic-guided selective estrogen receptor modulator can be a cost-effective strategy in the Chinese patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of UGT1A1*6/*28 genotyping for preventing FOLFIRI-induced severe neutropenia in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1*6/*28 genotyping compared with no genotyping or no dose adjustment before irinotecan administration in China. MATERIALS & METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to evaluate costs and health outcomes represented as quality-adjusted life years gained. Model inputs for the frequency of genotypes, the probability of neutropenia under FOLFIRI chemotherapy and direct costs and utilities were obtained from published sources. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The strategy of genotyping with dose reduction dominated all remaining strategies. Compared with the strategies of no genotyping and genotyping with unchanged dose, it resulted in only marginal quality-adjusted life year increases (0.0011 and 0.0012) but a cost reduction of $651.12 and $805.22 per patient, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the model was relatively robust. CONCLUSION: UGT1A1*6/*28 genotyping was cost saving for Chinese colorectal cancer patients.