[Values of computed tomography angiogram in non-cardiac surgery planning and cardiac risk assessment of coronary atherosclerosis during perioperative period].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the values of detecting coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography angiogram (CTA) on non-cardiac surgery planning and cardiac risk assessment of coronary atherosclerosis during perioperative period. METHODS: A total of 89 patients with suspected coronary heart disease (CHD) scheduled for non-cardiac surgery underwent coronary CTA to evaluate luminal stenosis and calculate calcification score. There were 56 males and 33 females with a mean age of 65.1 years. Operative sites included chests (n = 29), abdomens and pelvis (n = 26), large vessels (n = 3), bones and joints (n = 19) and other regions (n = 12). Reasons of abandoned or postponed surgery were documented to analyze the influence of CTA results on surgery planning. Cardiac events were recorded to assess the correlation with coronary atherosclerosis. RESULTS: Among them, 75 patients (84.27%) were diagnosed as atherosclerosis while 10 patients (11.24%) were negative; 2 patients had coronary artery bypass and another 2 had stent implantation. According to the results of CTA, 12 operations (13.48%) were canceled and 8 (8.98%) postponed after interventions. Severe stenosis of coronary lumen had significant effects on surgery planning (P = 0.003) while calcification score did not. In patients undergoing surgery as scheduled or after intervention, 1 had atrial fibrillation at post-operation. CONCLUSION: For the patients with suspected CHD scheduled for non-cardiac surgery, severity of coronary stenosis may greatly influence surgery planning. Preoperative coronary CTA may decrease the incidence of cardiac events during perioperative period.

Diagnostic accuracy and its affecting factors of dual-source CT for assessment of coronary stents patency and in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis is a common complication after stent implantation. However, the assessment of stent lumen in computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography is limited by multiple factors. Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the suspected affecting factors in diagnosing coronary in-stent restenosis by dual-source CT (DSCT) compared with coronary angiography. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen stents in 50 patients were evaluated with DSCT before coronary angiography for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis (≥ 50% luminal narrowing). Patency of each stent was analyzed by two independent expert radiologists blinded to the results of coronary angiography. The relationship between diagnostic accuracy and the suspected factors including age, body mass index (BMI), heart rate, variation of heart rate, radiation dose, image quality, location and stent characteristics (type, material, diameter, length and strut thickness) was assessed with both univariate and multivariate analysis. The fitting of a Logistic regression model was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Mean stent diameter was (2.9 ± 0.4) mm. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of DSCT in detection of in-stent restenosis were 69.2%, 91.2%, 50.0%, 95.9%, and 88.7%, respectively. In a subgroup of stents with a diameter ≥ 3.0 mm, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100.0%, 96.5%, 75.0%, 100.0%, and 96.8%, respectively. Stent diameter < 3.0 mm and poor image quality were associated with poor diagnostic accuracy (P < 0.05). The area under curve of ROC was 0.79. CONCLUSION: DSCT can provide high accuracy for the assessment of in-stent restenosis in stents with a diameter = 3.0 mm, and can play an important role in ruling out in-stent restenosis.