Cardiac computed tomography angiography for assessment of endothelial insufficiency of left atrial appendage disc-like occluder.

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to explore the diagnostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for endothelial insufficiency (EIS) of a left atrial appendage (LAA) disc-like occluder. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent placement of an LAA disc-like occluder (LAmbre; Lifetech Scientific) in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were found to have contrast agent entering the LAA at the 3-month postoperative CCTA examination underwent Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement of the LAA and construction of a three-dimensional (3D) model of the device for preliminary discernment between peri-device leakage (PDL) and EIS. These patients were then further examined by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to check for concordance with the computed tomography (CT) findings. According to the CT and TEE results, all patients were divided into the PDL group, total endothelialization group, and EIS group. The endothelial conditions and other implantation-related results were also tracked at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: All 59 patients underwent successful implantation of the LAmbre LAA closure device with no severe adverse events during the procedure. Thirty-five patients were found to have contrast agent entering the LAA at the 3-month postoperative CCTA follow-up. Based on the CT HU measurement and the 3D construction analysis results, these 35 patients were divided into the PDL group (19 patients) and the EIS group (16 patients). In the PDL group, the contrast agent infiltrated from the shoulder along the periphery of the occluder on two-dimensional (2D) CT images, and the 3D model showed a gap between the LAA and the device cover. However, the CCTA images of the other 16 patients in the EIS group showed that the contrast agent in the occluder on the 2D CTA images and 3D construction model confirmed the absence of a gap between the LAA and the device cover. TEE confirmed all of the CT results. The 6-month follow-up results showed that 14 of 19 patients in the EIS group achieved total endothelialization, whereas this number in the PDL group was only five of 19 patients. CONCLUSION: CCTA can replace TEE for examination of the endothelialization status, and patients with EIS have a higher chance of endothelialization than patients with PDL.

The prognostic value and economic benefits of coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve-guided strategy in patients with coronary artery disease.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the prognostic value and economic benefit of coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: All patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary angiography in our center between April 2021 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the caFFR guidance group (n = 160) and angiography guidance group (n = 211). A threshold of caFFR≤0.8 was used for revascularization. Otherwise, delayed PCI was preferred. The patients were prospectively followed up by telephone or outpatient service at six months for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. All in-hospital expenses were recorded, including initial hospitalization and re-hospitalization related to MACE. Results: There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. There were 2 (1.2%) patients in the caFFR guidance group and 5 (2.4%) patients in the angiography guidance group with MACE events during the following six months. Compared with angiography guidance, caFFR guidance reduced the revascularization rate (63.7% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.000), the average length of stents implanted (0.52 ± 0.88 vs. 1.1 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). The cost of consumables in the caFFR guidance group was significantly lower than that in the angiography guidance group (33257 ± 19595 CNY vs. 38341 ± 16485 CNY, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with coronary angiography guidance, caFFR guidance is of great significance in reducing revascularization and cost, which has significant health and economic benefits.