Oral Contrast-Enhanced Gastric Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Gastric Lesions: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography in the evaluation of gastric lesions, based on large-scale multicenter study. METHODS: The study enrolled 383,945 patients with suspect gastric lesions who underwent complete oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography and endoscopic evaluation. Two operators, unaware of the results of other diagnostic procedures, performed each examination independently. The accuracies of conventional ultrasonography, oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were determined. RESULTS: After oral contrast, the anatomy of the stomach and morphologic features of gastric lesions were clearly visualized. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values and accuracies of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detecting the sites, sizes, numbers, and the extent of gastric lesions,were similar to those of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (P > .05) and far greater than those of conventional ultrasonography (P < .01). Moreover, oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was far better than upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (P < .01) and was better than conventional ultrasonography (P < .05) in detecting the submucosal abnormalities (<5mm) and the adjacent structures abnormalities identified in surgical pathology. However, oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was a bit poorer than upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (P < .05) and far better than conventional ultrasonography (P < .01) in detecting the minor mucosal abnormalities (<5mm). CONCLUSION: Oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography is superior to conventional gastric ultrasonography in defining the anatomic location and extension of gastric lesions. Its diagnostic performance is not worse than upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and it can be used as a useful supplement to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

B-Lines in Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Interstitial Lung Diseases: Feasibility of Transthoracic Lung Sonographic Signs.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the value of sonographic B-lines (previously called "comet tail artifacts") in assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung diseases. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients with clinically diagnosed interstitial lung diseases complicated by pulmonary hypertension underwent transthoracic lung sonography and Doppler echocardiography for assessment of the presence of B-lines, the distance between them, and the pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure. A correlation analysis and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed. RESULTS: All patients had diffuse bilateral B-lines. The maximum number of B-lines seen in any positive zone (not a summation) was significantly correlated with the severity of PA systolic pressure (r= 0.812; P< .0001), and a linear regression equation could be demonstrated: that is, y = 6.06 x + 17.57, where x and y represent the number of B-lines and PA systolic pressure, respectively. A cutoff of more than 4 B-lines seen in any positive zone had 89.5% sensitivity, 85.0% specificity, and 87.2% accuracy in predicting elevated PA pressure (>30 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: The number of B-lines is useful in assessment of pulmonary hypertension, especially when tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary valve regurgitation do not exist or cannot be satisfactorily measured by Doppler echocardiography.

Sex-specific assessment of reduced coronary sinus flow in non-hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease at rest.

BACKGROUND: Access to data on the coronary flow in the coronary sinus (CS) can aid in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We tested the hypothesis that assessing the CS flow by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) at rest can detect coronary artery stenosis in non-hypertensive patients. METHODS: The antegrade phase of coronary flow in the CS was analyzed and compared in 140 male and 135 female non-hypertensive subjects who had all undergone coronary angiography. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences noted between males and females for the CS flow both in normal subjects and patients with CAD. Compared with normal subjects, patients with CAD had significantly lower blood flow in the CS both in males (196.6±174.31 vs. 367.65±168.04 ml/min, P<0.01) and females (183.04±65.46 vs. 244.13±135.43 ml/min P<0.01). For males, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the cutoff value of the CS flow (206 ml/min) for predicting a significant coronary artery stenosis (>70%) were 91.67%, 81.25%, and 85.71%, respectively. For females, those of the cutoff value of the CS flow (195 ml/min) were 85.71%, 75%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TTE can effectively detect coronary hemodynamically significant stenosis in non-hypertensive male and female patients at different cutoff values.