RESUMO
The diagnostic efficiency of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with different b-values and application of an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for differentiating disease states of lymphoma was investigated.Thirty-six patients at initial diagnosis and 69 after chemotherapy underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) with multiple b-values. Analysis parameters included the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for each b-value. Standard ADC, D, D*, and f were calculated using an IVIM model.For patients at initial diagnosis, compared with aggressive lymphomas, the benign lymph nodes exhibited higher mean ADC (2.34 vs 0.66â×â10âmm/s, Pâ<â.01) for bâ=â200âs/mm. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff value were 0.992, 96%, 100%, and 1.09â×10âmm/s, respectively. For patients who had finished chemotherapy, the f-values of IVIM for those with partial remission (PR) were higher than those of complete remission (CR) (56.22 vs 21.81%, Pâ<â.01). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff value were 0.937, 94%, 82%, 42.10%, respectively.For bâ=â200âs/mm, ADC values are most helpful for characterizing benign lymph nodes and malignant lymphomas. The f-value of the IVIM is most valuable in the identification of residual lesions of lymphomas after chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Linfoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the third most frequent type of nosocomial infections. Triclosan-coated sutures are often used to reduce the risk of SSI, but studies examining this have given conflicting results. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of SSI in adults. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify randomized clinical trials evaluating triclosan-coated sutures for preventing SSI on patients 18 y or older. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized clinical trials involving 5256 participants were included. Triclosan-coated sutures were associated with lower risk of SSI than uncoated sutures across all surgeries (risk ratio [RR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.88, P < 0.001). Similar proportions of patients experienced wound dehiscence with either type of suture (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.49-1.89, P = 0.92). Subgroup analysis showed lower risk of SSI with triclosan-coated sutures in abdominal surgeries (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.99, P = 0.04) and group with prophylactic antibiotic (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, P = 0.04). However, such risk reduction was not observed in cardiac surgeries, breast surgeries, or group without prophylactic antibiotic. CONCLUSIONS: Triclosan-coated sutures can decrease the incidence of SSI in abdominal surgeries and might not interfere with wound healing process. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to examine whether triclosan-coated sutures are effective at preventing SSI in non-abdominal surgeries and to further study the interaction of antibiotic prophylaxis with triclosan-coated sutures.