Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in China.

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy combined with ovarian function suppression (OFS) is recommended in intermediate- or high-risk patients among premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, in China, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy compared with endocrine therapy alone is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen (TAM), TAM+OFS, and exemestane plus OFS (EXE+OFS). METHODS: On the basis of prognostic data from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT), cost data from the Hospital Information System of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and health utility values from the published literature, a Markov model was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the treatment strategies. RESULTS: In a 25-year simulation of adjuvant therapy in Chinese women with early breast cancer, the total costs of TAM, TAM+OFS, and EXE+OFS were $7821, $9318, and $9445, respectively. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were 11.615, 11.896, and 11.734 years, respectively. Compared with TAM, the ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were $5,327.4021/QALY and $13,647.0588/QALY, respectively. The ICERs of TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS were below the threshold of $32,517/QALY. The reliability and stability of the simulation results were verified using Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: In the context of limited resources in China, TAM+OFS and EXE+OFS are cost-effective options compared with TAM.

Global longitudinal strain assessment in contrast-enhanced echocardiography in breast cancer patients: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) obtained from two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) can reflect cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer (BC) patients, however, the accuracy and reproducibility of 2D-STE are restricted due to poor image quality. METHODS: Between January 2019 and October 2021, 160 consecutive BC patients aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. The 160 BC patients (mean age: 48.41 ± 9.93 years, 100% women) underwent both 2D-STE and Contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CEcho), 125 of whom were included in the measurement of GLS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of 2D-STE and CEcho-STE. Correlation (r) was calculated using Pearson correlation. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Among 160 BC patients, more segments were recognized by CEcho-STE than by 2D-STE (2,771, 99.53% vs. 2,440, 84.72%). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by 2D was lower than CEcho (61.75 ± 6.59% vs. 64.14 ± 5.97%, P < 0.0001). The GLS obtained by 2D-STE was lower than CEcho-STE (-21.74 ± 2.77% vs. -26.79 ± 4.30%, P = 0.001). The ICC of the intraobserver and interobserver agreements in the CEcho-STE group was lower than that in the 2D-STE group. GLS measurements were in good agreement between the 2D-STE and CEcho-STE groups (r = 0.773). CONCLUSIONS: CEcho can overcome some imaging limitations and recognize more segments than 2D, which may provide an LVEF and GLS closer to the true value. Based on AutoStrain, CEcho-STE may serve as a complementary method for those with poor image quality.

Impact of financial support on the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer from 2002 to 2020: a prospective cohort from western China.

Background: Trastuzumab has significantly improved the outcomes of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer over 20 years, and remains a cornerstone of treatment for this subtype today. Higher mortality was reported in underinsured breast cancer, but the mechanism remains unclear. Financial support for trastuzumab has transitioned from no support, to the Breast Cancer Assistant Program (BCAP), and finally, health insurance. Exploring the association between survival outcomes and different financial supports is necessary to further improve the outcomes of HER2-positive breast cancer in resource-limited regions. Methods: A prospective cohort of primary early unilateral HER2-positive breast cancer patients registered between January 2002 and December 2020 was used. Patients were divided into the following 3 groups, based on when they were diagnosed with breast cancer: (I) before 2011 (no financial support); (II) 2011-2017 (BCAP support); and (III) 2018 onwards (health insurance support). Overall survival and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were the primary outcomes. The follow-up was performed according the standard procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore the association between financial support and prognosis with adjustment of demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, and treatments. Results: A total of 2,972 patients were finally identified. During the median follow-up period of 3.9 years, there were 153 breast cancer-related deaths. When fully adjusted potential covariates, patients supported by the BCAP had a 37% [hazard ratio (HR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96] decreased risk of overall mortality and that of patients covered by health insurance had a 64% decreased of overall mortality (HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.74) when compared with those who did not receive any financial support. Lower overall mortality was observed in patients covered by a higher reimbursement rate (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.94) or the urban scheme (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86) than those covered by a lower reimbursement rate or the rural scheme. The same trends were also observed for iDFS and breast cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Our findings revealed the independent role of financial support in improving the survival outcomes of the HER2-positive breast cancer in resource-limited regions and the underneath mechanism.

Cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study from China.

BACKGROUND: Both breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction surgery are less popular in China, although they can improve patients' quality of life. The main reason comes from the economy. There is currently no economic evaluation of different surgical treatment options for early breast cancer. Our study aims to assess the economic impact and long-term cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatments for early breast cancer. The surgical approaches are including mastectomy (MAST), breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and mastectomy with reconstruction (MAST+RECON). METHODS: Based on demographic data, disease-related information and other treatments, we applied propensity score matching (PSM) to perform 1: 1 matching among patients who underwent these three types of surgery in the tertiary academic medical center from 2011 to 2017 to obtain a balanced sample of covariates between groups. A Markov model was established. Clinical data and cost data were obtained from the medical records. Health utility values were derived from clinical investigations. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: After PSM, there were 205 cases in each group. In the matched data set, the distribution of covariates was fully balanced. The total cost of MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT was $37,392.84, $70,556.03 and $82,330.97, respectively. The quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) were 17.11, 18.40 and 20.20, respectively. Compared with MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT have an ICER of $25,707.90/QALY and $14,543.08/QALY, respectively. The ICER of BCT vs. MAST was less than the threshold of $27,931.04. The reliability and stability of the results were confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that in the context of the limited resources in China, after comparing the three surgical approaches, BCT is the more cost-effective and preferred solution.

Public health insurance and cancer-specific mortality risk among patients with breast cancer: A prospective cohort study in China.

Little is known about how health insurance policies, particularly in developing countries, influence breast cancer prognosis. Here, we examined the association between individual health insurance and breast cancer-specific mortality in China. We included 7436 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2009 and 2016, at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The health insurance plan of patient was classified as either urban or rural schemes and was also categorized as reimbursement rate (ie, the covered/total charge) below or above the median. Breast cancer-specific mortality was the primary outcome. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer-specific mortality, contrasting rates among patients with a rural insurance scheme or low reimbursement rate to that of those with an urban insurance scheme or high reimbursement rate, respectively. During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, we identified 326 deaths due to breast cancer. Compared to patients covered by urban insurance schemes, patients covered by rural insurance schemes had a 29% increased cancer-specific mortality (95% CI 0%-65%) after adjusting for demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment modes. Reimbursement rate below the median was associated with a 42% increased rate of cancer-specific mortality (95% CI 11%-82%). Every 10% increase in the reimbursement rate is associated with a 7% (95% CI 2%-12%) reduction in cancer-specific mortality risk, particularly in patients covered by rural insurance schemes (26%, 95% CI 9%-39%). Our findings suggest that underinsured patients face a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality in developing countries.