Pre-treatment assessment of chemotherapy for cancer patients: a multi-site evidence implementation project of 74 hospitals in China.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy, whilst treating tumours, can also lead to numerous adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, fatigue and kidney toxicity, threatening the physical and mental health of patients. Simultaneously, misuse of chemotherapeutic drugs can seriously endanger patients' lives. Therefore, to maintain the safety of chemotherapy for cancer patients and to reduce the incidence of adverse reactions to chemotherapy, many guidelines state that a comprehensive assessment of the cancer patient should be conducted and documented before chemotherapy. This recommended procedure, however, has yet to be extensively embraced in Chinese hospitals. As such, this study aimed to standardise the content of pre-chemotherapy assessment for cancer patients in hospitals and to improve nurses' adherence to pre-chemotherapy assessment of cancer patients by conducting a national multi-site evidence implementation in China, hence protecting the safety of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions to chemotherapy in patients. METHODS: The national multi-site evidence implementation project was launched by a JBI Centre of Excellence in China and conducted using the JBI approach to evidence implementation. A pre- and post-audit approach was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the project. This project had seven phases: training, planning, baseline audit, evidence implementation, two rounds of follow-up audits (3 and 9 months after evidence implementation, respectively) and sustainability assessment. A live online broadcast allowed all participating hospitals to come together to provide a summary and feedback on the implementation of the project. RESULTS: Seventy-four hospitals from 32 cities in China participated in the project, four withdrew during the project's implementation, and 70 hospitals completed the project. The pre-and post-audit showed a significant improvement in the compliance rate of nurses performing pre-chemotherapy assessments for cancer patients. Patient satisfaction and chemotherapy safety were also improved through the project's implementation, and the participating nurses' enthusiasm and belief in implementing evidence into practice was increased. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the feasibility of academic centres working with hospitals to promote the dissemination of evidence in clinical practice to accelerate knowledge translation. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of cross-regional and cross-organisational collaborations to facilitate evidence dissemination.

Coping target checklist for home-based older adults living with disabilities and their spousal caregivers.

BACKGROUND: The substantial rise in the population of older adults living with disabilities is a prominent concern, presenting a profound challenge for healthcare and social welfare systems. Community-based home care is seen as an effective approach to meet the care needs of older adults living with disabilities. OBJECTIVE: To construct a coping target checklist for home-based older adults living with disabilities and their spousal caregivers. METHODS: The initial draft was developed based on a comprehensive literature review, followed by two rounds of Delphi correspondence final version. RESULTS: A comprehensive literature review resulted in the development of 7 modules, 20 topics. After round 1, 3 items were removed, 3 sections, 1 topic and 1 objective were new additions, 16 items were modified, split or combined. Four sections, 3 sections (Individual coping target for spousal caregivers, Individual coping target for older adults living with disabilities, and Shared coping target), 7 modules, 18 topics and 49 objectives were finally identified in round 2. The content of the list tool is derived from three perspectives: self-management strategies for older adults living with disabilities, caregiving strategies for spousal caregivers, and combined. CONCLUSIONS: The coping target checklist was intended to be evidence-based and reflective of a practical direction for home-based older adults living with disabilities and their spousal caregivers living at home.

Assessment and management of radiation-induced trismus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used radiotherapy technology in oncology, which enables precise conformation of the radiation dose to the target volume and reduces the risk of radiation damage to the adjacent normal structures. Nevertheless, it is still inevitable for IMRT of head and neck cancer to cause radiation-related toxic and side effects, such as dry mouth, mucositis, oral dysarthria, taste disorder, osteonecrosis, and trismus. Trismus is one of the most common late side effects caused by radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which seriously affects the quality of life for patients with NPC. However, the current clinical assessment and management of trismus after radiotherapy for NPC are still imperfect. This best practice implementation project aimed to implement an evidence-based practice in assessing and managing trismus for NPC patients who underwent radiotherapy, thereby improving the compliance of clinical practice with the best evidence and the quality of life of patients with NPC. METHODS: This evidence-based audit and feedback project was implemented using a three-phase approach at a third-class hospital in China, following JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and GRiP evidence application. The first phase included a baseline audit with six evidence-based audit criteria derived from the best available evidence. The second phase included analyzing the results of the baseline audit, identifying barriers to compliance with best practice principles, and developing and implementing strategies to address the barriers identified in the baseline audit. The third phase involved a follow-up audit to assess the results of the interventions implemented to improve practice. RESULTS: After evidence application, the compliance rate for audit criterion 1 increased from 0% at baseline audit to 70% at follow-up audit. The compliance rate for audit criterion 2 increased from 0% to 100%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 3 increased from 22 to 62%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 4 increased from 88 to 100%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 5 was 100% at baseline audit and follow-up audit. The compliance rate for audit criterion 6 increased from 0 to 55%. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the best evidence for the assessment and management of trismus of patients with NPC after radiotherapy is conducive to improving the compliance of clinical practice with the best evidence, standardizing clinical nursing practice, improving the quality of clinical nursing, and better preventing severe trismus in patients with NPC after radiotherapy.

Assessment and nonpharmacological management for patients with cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a common multifactorial syndrome, which affects up to 80% patients with advanced cancer. At present, evidence to support the benefit of pharmacological intervention in the management of CACS is limited. Patients would benefit from standard procedures for early assessment and identification of cancer anorexia-cachexia, and using nonpharmacological strategies to manage patients with CACS. This best practice implementation project aimed to implement an evidence-based practice in assessing and managing patients with CACS, thereby improving the compliance of clinical practice with the best evidence and the quality of life of patients with CACS. METHODS: This was an evidence-based audit and feedback project that used a three-phase approach at a public hospital in China. Phase 1 included the development of seven evidence-based audit criteria and carrying out a baseline audit on 30 patients using the JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Nanfang Hospital. Phase 2 utilized the Getting Research into Practice component of the Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System to identify barriers to compliance with best practice principles and developed strategies and resources to improve compliance. Phase 3 involved conducting a follow-up audit using the same sample size and audit criteria to assess the results of interventions implemented to improve practice and identify issues that would be addressed in future audit. RESULTS: The compliance rates of audit criteria 1, 2 and 6 were 100% at both baseline and follow-up audit. After the application of evidence, the compliance rate increased from 0 to 100% for audit criterion 3, from 0 to 76.6% for audit criterion 4, from 23 to 70% for audit criterion 5, and from 0 to 40% for audit criterion 5. CONCLUSION: The best evidence for the assessment and nonpharmacological management of cancer patients with CACS can improve clinical practice, the quality of clinical nursing, and patient satisfaction. The application of electronic informatization promotes the implementation and maintenance of best practice.

Diabetic foot ulcer risk assessment and prevention in patients with diabetes: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most serious complications in patients with diabetes. Early identification of risk factors can prevent its occurrence and delay its progression. The aim of this project is to conduct an audit of DFU risk assessment protocols at a large tertiary hospital and evaluate the impact of any changes in compliance with the developed evidence-based best practice criteria. METHODS: Preimplementation and postimplementation audits based on JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System were conducted at the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism of a tertiary hospital in China. The Getting Research into Practice audit tool was used to analyze the barriers and inadequacies encountered in practice. A total of 12 nurses and 30 patients with diabetes were included in the baseline and follow-up audits. RESULTS: There were 15 baseline audits that indicated deficits in DFU risk assessment by nurses, with 0% compliance for three criteria and 50% compliance or less for seven others. Strategies developed by the project team to address the identified barriers to compliance were adopted, leading to significant improvement in compliance with most criteria at the follow-up audit compared with baseline with 11 criteria achieving at least 90% compliance. CONCLUSION: The project showed that regular audits of foot ulcer risk assessment can help to identify barriers to their implementation. Advising patients of their risk status can support appropriate self-care practices. Further audits are needed to implement evidence-based practices in all aspects of diabetes patient care.

Perceptions of nurses and physicians on pay-for-performance in hospital: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

AIMS: This study aimed to systematically examine perceptions of nurses and physicians on pay-for-performance in hospital. BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance projects have proliferated over the past two decades, most systematic reviews of which solely focused on its effectiveness in primary health care and the physicians' or nurses' attitudes. However, systematic reviews of qualitative approaches for better examining perceptions of both nurses and physicians in hospital were lacking. EVALUATION: Electronic databases were systematically searched with date from the inception to 31 December 2020. Meta-aggregation synthesis methodology and the conceptual framework of the theory of planned behaviour were used to summarize findings. KEY ISSUES: A total of nine studies were included. Three major synthesized themes were identified: (1) perceptions of the motivation effects and positive outcomes, (2) perceptions about the design defects and negative effects and (3) perceptions of the obstacles in the implementation process. CONCLUSION: To maximize the intended positive effects, nurses' and physicians' perceptions should be considered and incorporated into the project design and implementation stage. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The paper gives enlightenment to nurse managers on improving and advancing the cause of nurses when planning for or evaluating their institutions' policies on pay-for-performance in the future research.

Clinical assessment and screening of stroke patients with aphasia: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: As a critical form of stroke damage, aphasia negatively impacts stroke patients' return to society. Speech and language intervention has been found to assist in optimizing poststroke aphasia patient outcomes; consequently, early identification and diagnosis are vital for poststroke aphasia to ensure that patients receive the rehabilitation they require. This project aimed to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in the assessment and screening of stroke patients with aphasia and to improve the clinical outcomes of patients who suffer from poststroke aphasia in a large tertiary hospital. METHODS: The current evidence implementation project was conducted in the neurology and rehabilitation departments of a tertiary hospital in China. Six audit criteria were developed for the baseline and follow-up audits. The project used the JBI PACES software, as well as JBI's Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool, to foster evidence-based healthcare in practice. RESULTS: Although the performance of all evidence-based criteria during the baseline audit was poor, barriers were identified through baseline, and the project team carried out and implemented developed strategies following Getting Research into Practice resources. All the criteria improved from baseline after the follow-up cycle, with four out of six criteria achieving a compliance rate of 100%, and two evidence-based criteria recorded at 73 and 80% compliance, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current project successfully increased EBP for the assessment and screening of stroke patients with aphasia. Further studies are needed to ensure the project's long-term sustainability.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema patient and healthcare professional experiences in lymphedema self-management: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) self-management plays an important role in the lymphedema therapy. However, clinical knowledge of BCRL self-management remains minimal. This study aims to explore the experience surrounding lymphedema self-management from the perspectives of BCRL patients and healthcare professionals. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were implemented with BCRL patients and healthcare professionals. Audio-recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was undertaken to analyze the interview data. RESULTS: Thirteen BCRL patients (aged 34-65 years) and nine healthcare professionals (2 physicians, 4 nurses, and 3 lymphedema therapists) were interviewed. Five themes emerged from interviews with participants: knowledge-attitude-practice surrounding lymphedema self-management, emotional reactions towards lymphedema self-management, factors influencing lymphedema self-management, support needs for lymphedema self-management, healthcare professional support of BCRL self-management. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed knowledge-attitude-practice, feelings, influencing factors, roles, dilemmas, and support needs regarding BCRL self-management. Greater effort is required for healthcare professionals to strengthen the lymphedema self-management. Providing more educational program and holistic support, and strengthening the facilitators and controlling the barriers might benefit promoting lymphedema self-management. Likewise, healthcare professionals need adequate training to be able to meet patients' self-management support needs.

A Chinese version of the chemotherapy-induced alopecia distress scale based on reliability and validity assessment in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a common and emotionally traumatic side effect on breast cancer patients. In order to make up for the deficiency of measuring tools in China, our study aims at translating the chemotherapy-induced alopecia distress scale (CADS) into Chinese and evaluating the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CADS (CADS-C) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: The validity and reliability of CADS-C were measured by a questionnaire survey among 301 breast cancer patients from Chinese mainland. Construct validity was assessed through factor analysis and contrasted group comparisons. The validity of the content was examined by an experts group. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The content validity index was 0.94; a structure with three factors was revealed by exploratory factor analysis which explained 65.40% of the variance and proved by confirmatory factor analysis. The contrasted group comparisons showed significant differences among different degrees of alopecia. The average variance extracted and composite reliability and correlations between CADS and body image, quality of life and self-esteem proved the convergent validity. The Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total scale were 0.90 and 0.89 respectively, indicating satisfactory internal consistency and time stability. CONCLUSION: The scale appears to be a reliable and valid tool to measure chemotherapy-induced alopecia distress among breast cancer patients in China.

Pre-treatment assessment for patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to conduct an audit of pre-treatment assessment for patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and to assess the impact of these changes in improving the compliance with evidence-based best practice criteria in a large tertiary hospital. INTRODUCTION: Pre-treatment assessment before cancer chemotherapy is paramount in order for patients to receive effective and safe treatment. Numerous guidelines and consensus-based standards for safe chemotherapy administration have been developed, which state that nurses should conduct and document comprehensive health assessments for patients prior to administration of chemotherapy. METHODS: The project was conducted in the Breast Surgery Department of a nearly 3000-bed tertiary hospital in China. Evidence-based audit criteria were developed based on a JBI evidence summary. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit tool were used to promote changes in practice. Sample sizes of 13 clinical nurses and 30 breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy were included in baseline and follow-up audits. RESULTS: The baseline audit indicated significant deficits in pre-treatment assessment nursing practice in the unit, with eight of the 12 criteria recording 0% compliance and one criterion recording only 3% compliance. Barriers to compliance were identified by the project team, and a series of strategies were adopted to address the barriers. There was improvement in compliance with all the best practice criteria in the follow-up audit compared with the baseline audit, with each one achieving a minimum of 90% compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The project showed that regular and focused education and ongoing audits on pre-treatment assessment can help to optimize safe and effective chemotherapy treatment. Further strategies are planned to sustain the implementation of evidence.

Improving compliance of risk assessment and nonpharmacological interventions for deep venous thrombosis prevention in a respiratory ICU: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: To increase the compliance with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) nonpharmacologic prophylaxis best practice recommendations while ensuring appropriate and structured nonpharmacologic prophylaxis for patients in the respiratory ICU. BACKGROUND: DVT is a major problem for patients, with those who are critically ill representing a high-risk population for developing the condition. Nonpharmacologic prophylaxis is considered an effective intervention. However, the application of such interventions in practice has not been optimal to date. METHODS: The current project was conducted in a respiratory ICU of a tertiary hospital. Audit criteria were developed on the basis of an evidence summary developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, whereby the institute's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System program to facilitate an audit and feedback cycle was utilized as an implementation framework. Baseline and follow-up audits on nonpharmacological DVT prophylaxis were conducted for 35 patients against five evidence-based recommendations. In addition, the nurses' knowledge and attitude regarding DVT prophylaxis were investigated both prior to and postimplementation. RESULTS: In the baseline audit, compliance with the five evidence-based audit criteria was less than 15%. After the implementation of strategies including education, person-centered care, financial and human-resource support, there was a significant improvement in all the audit criteria. In addition, improvements in the nurses' knowledge and attitude regarding DVT prophylaxis were reported. The rate of discharged patients due to a deterioration of their condition decreased from 31.4 to 5.7% in the follow-up cycle. One DVT patient occurred in the baseline data, whereas no new incidences of DVT were found in the follow-up data. CONCLUSION: The project not only improved nurses' knowledge and attitude regarding DVT prevention, but also remarkably improved the implementation of nonpharmacological DVT prophylaxis. The application of evidence-based nonpharmacological DVT prophylaxis may improve patients' outcomes in the ICU.

Assessment and management of cough among patients with lung cancer in a radiotherapy department in China: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: This project aimed to implement an evidence-based practice to assess and manage lung cancer-associated cough, thereby relieving patients' physical pain and psychological challenges and improving their quality of life. INTRODUCTION: Cough is one of the most common symptoms experienced by patients with lung cancer. If a cough is not proactively managed, patients may develop decreased compliance with treatments and experience a reduced quality of life. Cough assessment and management are essential components of nursing practice that should include evidence-based interventions. METHODS: Seven evidence-based audit criteria were developed from current evidence. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) was used to perform a baseline audit on 30 patients and 20 nurses in the Department of Radiotherapy of Nanfang Hospital. The Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) component of PACES was used to identify barriers, strategies, resources and outcomes. Following implementation of strategies to improve compliance, a post-audit was conducted using the same sample size and audit criteria. RESULTS: The seven evidence-based audit criteria were as follows: 1) Clinicians have received training on the assessment and management of lung cancer-associated cough; 2) In patients with lung cancer-associated cough, a comprehensive assessment was conducted to identify any co-existing causes linked to cough; 3) Any reversible causes of cough were treated according to evidence-based guidelines; 4) A validated scale was used to assess the frequency and severity of cough and distress experienced by the patients; 5) Patients (and their caregivers) have received education regarding management of cough; 6) Patients (and their caregivers) have received training on cough suppression exercises; 7) For symptomatic therapy, a stepwise approach was followed according to evidence-based guidelines. The baseline results showed that compliance rates were 0% for criteria 1, 4 and 5; 70% for criterion 6; 80% for criterion 7; 90% for criterion 3 and 93% for criterion 2. The implementation of strategies to increase compliance with best practice, including establishing training and education programs for nursing staff and patients, utilizing some validated scales to assess the frequency and severity of cough and the distress caused to the patients, and establishing a quality control team to supervise implementation of the assessment and management of cough, achieved ≥ 93% compliance rate for all seven audit criteria. CONCLUSION: An evidence-based and nurses-oriented best practice for cough assessment and management was successfully established among patients with lung cancer-associated cough.

A Chinese version of the Patient Perceptions of Patient-Empowering Nurse Behaviours Scale: Reliability and validity assessment in chronically ill patients.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To translate the Patient Perceptions of Patient-Empowering Nurse Behaviours Scale (PPPNBS) into Chinese and to psychometrically test the Chinese version of PPPNBS (PPPNBS-C) in chronically ill patients. BACKGROUND: The growing prevalence and burden of chronic illnesses became the driving force for the need of empowerment as an approach to engage patients in self-management. The PPPNBS was developed to assess patient perceptions of the process of empowerment during hospitalisation. Extending its application to different clinical context and ethnicities is worth pursuing. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. METHODS: The PPPNBS was translated according to Brislin's translation guidelines and was culturally adapted. A questionnaire survey was carried out to determine the reliability and validity of the PPPNBS-C among a total of 517 hospitalised patients with chronic illnesses. RESULTS: The content validity was found to be good with a content validity index of 0.94. Exploratory factor analysis identified six factors explaining 68.56% of the total variance and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed this six-factor structure. The hypothesised differences were demonstrated through contrasted group comparisons by time since diagnosis and length of hospital stay. The score of the PPPNBS-C was significantly and positively associated with that of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, as was the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale score, providing evidence of convergent validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.960 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86 for the total scale, explaining good internal consistency and time stability. CONCLUSIONS: The PPPNBS-C has preliminary verification of the validity and reliability and could be useful in measuring patient perceptions of patient-empowering nurse behaviours. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The PPPNBS-C can be applied to chronically ill patients as a metric of the implementation status of patient-empowering nurse behaviours and can be used as a guide to encourage nurse's intentional utilisation of empowering behaviours.