3D-printed dosage forms for oral administration: a review.

Oral administration is the most commonly used form of treatment due to its advantages, including high patient compliance, convenient administration, and minimal preparation required. However, the traditional preparation process of oral solid preparation has many defects. Although continuous manufacturing line that combined all the unit operations has been developed and preliminarily applied in the pharmaceutical industry, most of the currently used manufacturing processes are still complicated and discontinuous. As a result, these complex production steps will lead to low production efficiency and high quality control risk of the final product. Additionally, the large-scale production mode is inappropriate for the personalized medicines, which commonly is customized with small amount. Several attractive techniques, such as hot-melt extrusion, fluidized bed pelletizing and spray drying, could effectively shorten the process flow, but still, they have inherent limitations that are challenging to address. As a novel manufacturing technique, 3D printing could greatly reduce or eliminate these disadvantages mentioned above, and could realize a desirable continuous production for small-scale personalized manufacturing. In recent years, due to the participation of 3D printing, the development of printed drugs has progressed by leaps and bounds, especially in the design of oral drug dosage forms. This review attempts to summarize the new development of 3D printing technology in oral preparation and also discusses their advantages and disadvantages as well as potential applications.

Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR), namely CT-QFR, and compare it with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-based Murray law QFR (µQFR), using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. METHODS: Patients who underwent coronary CTA, ICA and pressure wire-based FFR assessment within two months were retrospectively analyzed. CT-QFR and µQFR were computed in blinded fashion and compared with FFR, all applying the same cut-off value of ≤0.80 to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis. RESULTS: Paired comparison between CT-QFR and µQFR was performed in 191 vessels from 167 patients. Average FFR was 0.81 â€‹± â€‹0.10 and 42.4% vessels had an FFR ≤0.80. CT-QFR had a slightly lower correlation with FFR compared with µQFR, although statistically non-significant (r â€‹= â€‹0.87 versus 0.90, p â€‹= â€‹0.110). The vessel-level diagnostic performance of CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than µQFR (AUC â€‹= â€‹0.94 versus 0.97, difference: -0.03 [95%CI: -0.00-0.06], p â€‹= â€‹0.095), and substantially higher than diameter stenosis by CTA (AUC difference: 0.17 [95%CI: -0.10-0.23], p â€‹< â€‹0.001). The patient-level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for CT-QFR to identify FFR value â€‹≤ â€‹0.80 was 88%, 90%, 86%, 86%, 91%, 6.59 and 0.12, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR was 84% in extensively calcified lesions, while in vessels with no or less calcification, CT-QFR showed a comparable diagnostic accuracy with µQFR (91% versus 92%, p â€‹= â€‹0.595). Intra- and inter-observer variability in CT-QFR analysis was -0.00 â€‹± â€‹0.04 and 0.00 â€‹± â€‹0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Performance in diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis by CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than µQFR, and substantially higher than CTA-derived diameter stenosis. Extensively calcified lesions reduced the diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR.

Global variation of soil microbial carbon-use efficiency in relation to growth temperature and substrate supply.

Soil microbial carbon-use efficiency (CUE), which is defined as the ratio of growth over C uptake, is commonly assumed as a constant or estimated by a temperature-dependent function in current microbial-explicit soil carbon (C) models. The temperature-dependent function (i.e., CUE = CUE0 + m × (T - 20)) simulates the dynamic CUE based on the specific CUE at a given reference temperature (i.e., CUE0) and a temperature response coefficient (i.e., m). Here, based on 780 observations from 98 sites, we showed a divergent spatial distribution of the soil microbial CUE (0.5 ± 0.25; mean ± SD) at the global scale. Then, the key parameters CUE0 and m in the above equation were estimated as 0.475 and -0.016, respectively, based on the observations with the Markov chain Monte Carlo technique. We also found a strong dependence of microbial CUE on the type of C substrate. The multiple regression analysis showed that glucose influences the variation of measured CUE associated with the environmental factors. Overall, this study confirms the global divergence of soil microbial CUE and calls for the incorporation of C substrate beside temperature in estimating the microbial CUE in different biomes.

A comparison of the Gallie technique and casting versus the harms technique for the treatment of odontoid fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare perioperative, clinical parameters, complications, and reoperation rate of the Gallie technique and head-neck-chest plaster with the Harms technique in the treatment of odontoid fractures. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: Level I spine center. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven patients with odontoid fractures treated either with the Gallie technique and casting or the Harms technique between July 2002 and June 2008. INTERVENTION: Surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, comparison of the two groups was conducted in terms of hospital stay, blood loss, operation time, cost of the first admission, total cost, time to fusion, time to return to previous occupation, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, visual analog scale scores of neck pain, complications (nonunion, delayed union, hardware breakage, wound infection), and reoperation rate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stay, time to fusion, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, neck pain visual analog scale scores, complications, or reoperation rate between the two groups. Blood loss, operation time, cost of the first admission, and total cost were significantly lower in the Gallie group than that in the Harms group. However, the Gallie group took longer to return to previous occupation than the Harms group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Management of odontoid fractures by either the Gallie technique and casting or the Harms technique was found to be similar in clinical outcomes. Although the Harms technique was associated with more blood loss, operation time, and cost, the Harms technique was found to be superior to the Gallie technique with casting in terms of time to return to previous occupation.