Current situation and cost-effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: A single-center, large-sample study from China.

PURPOSE: 18F-FDG PET/CT has an important role in the evaluation of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). Our study was to investigate the current status of the inclusion of 18F-FDG PET/CT within FUO/ IUO diagnostic work-up and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of it in China. METHODS: A total of 741 FUO/IUO patients admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical characteristic, medical expenses to reach diagnosis and the proportion of definite etiological diagnosis achieved upon hospital discharge were compared between patients examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT group) and patients not examined by 18F-FDG PET/CT (non-18F-FDG PET/CT group). RESULTS: The mean age, proportion of critically-ill patients, proportion of rheumatologic diseases, the number of examinations and hospitalisation days to reach diagnosis in the 18F-FDG PET/CT group were significantly higher than those in the non-18F-FDG PET/CT group. The mean medical costs of 18F-FDG PET/CT group were significantly higher than those of non-18F-FDG PET/CT group, whereas the proportion of definite etiological diagnosis achieved upon hospital discharge of 18F-FDG PET/CT group was significantly higher than that of non-18F-FDG PET/CT group. The mean hospitalisation days and mean medical costs before diagnosis were significantly lower in patients who undertook 18F-FDG PET/CT ≤ 7 days after hospital admission than those in patients who undertook 18F-FDG PET/CT > 7 days after hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG PET/CT is mostly used in critically-ill and hard-to-diagnose FUO/IUO patients currently in China, which may conceal its cost-effective advantage. While the early use of 18F-FDG PET/CT according to patient characteristics and etiological clues could help to reduce hospitalization stay, limit medical costs, thus producing its diagnostic effect to the great extent.

A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial of oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza in a high-risk Chinese population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir treatment in a population at high risk for influenza. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, controlled trial involving Chinese patients with chronic respiratory diseases (chronic bronchitis, obstructive emphysema, bronchial asthma or bronchiectasis) or chronic cardiac disease. Patients showing symptoms of influenza were randomly assigned to receive oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 5 days (oseltamivir group), or symptomatic treatment (control group) within 48 h after symptom onset. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were duration and severity of illness in influenza-infected patients. Other outcome measures included incidence of complications, antibiotic use, hospitalization and total medical cost. RESULTS: Of the 118 recruited patients, 56 were identified as influenza-infected through laboratory tests (oseltamivir, N = 27; control, N = 29). Relative to symptomatic treatment, oseltamivir significantly reduced the duration of influenza symptoms by 36.8% (p = 0.0479), and the severity by 43.1% (p = 0.0002). In addition, oseltamivir significantly reduced the duration of fever by 45.2% (p = 0.0051), and the time to return to baseline health status by 5 days (p = 0.0011). The incidence of complications (11% vs. 45%, p = 0.0053) and antibiotic use (37% vs. 69%, p = 0.0167) were also significantly lower in the oseltamivir group compared with the control group. The cost of treating influenza and its complications was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.2462). CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir is effective and well tolerated in high-risk patients with chronic respiratory or cardiac diseases. It can reduce the duration and severity of influenza symptoms and decrease the incidence of secondary complications and antibiotic use, without increasing the total medical cost.