Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Diabet Med ; 36(2): 243-251, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30368898

RESUMO

AIM: This study aims to determine whether a resource- and culturally appropriate lifestyle intervention programme in South Asian countries, provided to women with gestational diabetes (GDM) after childbirth, will reduce the incidence of worsening of glycaemic status in a manner that is affordable, acceptable and scalable. METHODS: Women with GDM (diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test using the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria) will be recruited from 16 hospitals in India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Participants will undergo a repeat oral glucose tolerance test at 6 ± 3 months postpartum and those without Type 2 diabetes, a total sample size of 1414, will be randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care. The intervention will consist of four group sessions, 84 SMS or voice messages and review phone calls over the first year. Participants requiring intensification of the intervention will receive two additional individual sessions over the latter half of the first year. Median follow-up will be 2 years. The primary outcome is the proportion of women with a change in glycaemic category, using the American Diabetes Association criteria: (i) normal glucose tolerance to impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance, or Type 2 diabetes; or (ii) impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance to Type 2 diabetes. Process evaluation will explore barriers and facilitators of implementation of the intervention in each local context, while trial-based and modelled economic evaluations will assess cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The study will generate important new evidence about a potential strategy to address the long-term sequelae of GDM, a major and growing problem among women in South Asia. (Clinical Trials Registry of India No: CTRI/2017/06/008744; Sri Lanka Clinical Trials Registry No: SLCTR/2017/001; and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier No: NCT03305939).


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Gestacional/prevenção & controle , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Bangladesh/etnologia , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Diabetes Gestacional/etnologia , Ética em Pesquisa , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tamanho da Amostra , Sri Lanka/etnologia , Estatística como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 18(3): 289-94, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26661693

RESUMO

AIMS: To formulate a combined cardiovascular risk score in diabetes that could be useful both to physicians and healthcare funders. METHODS: Data were derived from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Observational (ADVANCE-ON) study, a randomized controlled trial (mean duration 5 years) with a post-randomization follow-up (mean 4.9 years), that included 11 140 high-risk patients with diabetes. The outcome analysed was the occurrence of either fatal or non-fatal macrovascular or renal disease. A Cox regression model was used to determine weightings in the risk score. The resultant score was recalibrated to each of three major global regions, as covered by the ADVANCE-ON study. RESULTS: Over a median of 9.9 years, 1145 patients experienced at least one component of the combined outcome event. The resultant score, the AD-ON risk score, incorporated 13 demographic or clinical variables. Its discrimination was modest [c-statistic = 0.668 (95% confidence interval 0.651, 0.685)] but its calibration was excellent (predicted and observed risks coincided well, within disparate global regions). In terms of the integrated discrimination improvement index, its performance was marginally superior, over a 10-year risk horizon, to existing risk scores in clinical use, from a restricted version of the same data, for macrovascular and renal disease separately. CONCLUSIONS: The AD-ON risk score has advantages over the existing vascular risk scores in diabetes that used data from the original ADVANCE trial, which treat macrovascular and renal diseases separately. These advantages include its simplicity of use and global application.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Angiopatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Gliclazida/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Indapamida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perindopril/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA