Gasto energético, composición corporal, trastornos metabólicos e ingesta energética en pacientes con antecedentes de craneofaringioma / Energy expenditure, body composition, metabolic disorders, and energy intake in patients with a history of craniopharyngioma

Introducción: Los craneofaringiomas son malformaciones histológicamente benignas que se sitúan entre el hipotálamo y la hipófisis, zonas con un rol determinante en la modulación de la saciedad. Aun siendo tumores benignos, presentan una considerable morbilidad. La obesidad está presente hasta en un 52% de los pacientes. Objetivo: evaluar factores de riesgo cardiovascular, composición corporal y gasto energético en pacientes con craneofaringioma, y compararlos con un grupo de obesos multifactoriales. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con resección quirúrgica de craneofaringioma, menores de 21 años, en seguimiento en nuestro centro entre mayo 2012 hasta abril 2013 que aceptaron participar por medio del consentimiento informado. Se realizó valoración antropométrica, composición corporal con impedanciometría, gasto energético con calorimetría indirecta y valoración de ingesta energética y de macronutrientes. Se determinó resistencia a la insulina (HOMA-IR) y dislipemia. Se comparó a los pacientes con craneofaringioma con obesidad, con un grupo de pacientes con obesidad multifactorial. Resultados: se estudiaron 39 pacientes. El 59% era obeso y presentó significativamente menor% de masa magra (62.4 vs 67.5 p=0.01) y mayor% de masa grasa (37.5 vs 32.5 p=0.01) comparados con los obesos multifactoriales. No se encontró diferencias en el compromiso metabólico entre los obesos con y sin antecedente de craneofaringioma. Se dividieron los pacientes en tertilos según% de gasto energético para categorizar en gasto bajo vs normal. Se encontró asociación positiva entre% de gasto energético y% de masa magra en obesos multifactoriales (68±1%; en los gasto normal vs 62.6± 1% en los gasto bajo: p 0,04). Sin diferencias dentro de la población de obesos con antecedente de craneofaringioma (62±2.7 en los gasto normal/alto vs 61.2±1.8% en los gasto bajo: p 0,8). El gasto energético basal (REE) fue menor en los pacientes con antecedente de craneofaringioma vs obesos multifactoriales, independientemente de la masa magra, lo que sustenta que existirían otros factores que actuarían disminuyendo el gasto energético. No hubo diferencia con respecto a la ingesta en ambos grupos estudiados. Conclusiones: los pacientes con antecedente de craneofaringioma presentan menor gasto energético no relacionado a la masa magra y similar ingesta energética comparado con obesos multifactoriales. No hubo diferencias en el compromiso metabólico entre los obesos con y sin antecedentes de craneofaringioma (AU)

Introduction: Craniopharyngiomas are histologically benign malformations located between hypothalamus and the pituitary gland, areas that play an important role in satiety modulation. Although the tumors are benign, they may cause significant morbidity. Obesity is found in up to 52% of patients. Aim: To assess cardiovascular risk factors, body composition, and energy expenditure in patients with craniopharyngioma, and to compare them to results in a group of children with multifactorial obesity. Material and methods: All patients who underwent surgical resection of craniopharyngioma, younger than 21 years of age, who were being followed-up at our center between May 2012 and April 2013 who gave their informed consent to participate were enrolled in the study. Anthropometric measurements, body composition with impedanciometer, energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry, and energy and macronutrient intake were evaluated. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and dyslipidemia were determined. Patients with craniopharyngioma associated with obesity were compared to patients with multifactorial obesity. Results: Of 39 patients studied, 59% were obese and a significantly lower percentage of lean mass (62.4 vs 67.5 p=0.01) and a higher percentage of fat mass (37.5 vs 32.5 p=0.01) compared to multifactorial obese subjects. No differences were found in metabolic involvement between obese subjects with and those without a history of craniopharyngioma. Patients were divided into tertiles according to percentage of energy expenditure to categorize low versus normal expenditure. A positive correlation was found between percentage of energy expenditure and lean mass percentage in subjects with multifactorial obesity (68±1%; in those with normal energy expenditure versus 62.6±1% in those with low energy expenditure: p 0.04). No difference was found within the group of obese patients with a history of craniopharyngioma (62±2.7 in those with normal/high expenditure versus 61.2±1.8% in those with low expenditure: p 0.8). Baseline energy expenditure (BEE) was lower in craniopharyngioma patients than in those with multifactorial obesity, regardless of lean mass percentage, supporting the hypothesis that other factors may be involved in the decrease of energy expenditure. There was no difference in the food intake between both groups. Conclusions: Patients with a history of craniopharyngioma had a lower energy expenditure unrelated to lean mass and a similar energy intake compared to subjects with multifactorial obesity. No differences were found in metabolic involvement between obese subject with and those without a history of craniopharyngioma (AU)

Esophagoscopy and endoscopic esophageal ultrasound in the assessment of esophageal function.

Esophagoscopy is an ideal method to detect mucosal or structural abnormalities of the esophagus and proximal stomach. The exclusion of malignant dysphagia is the prime role of esophagoscopy in assessment of esophageal function. Esophagoscopy and biopsy are mandatory for mucosal assessment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Indirect and sometimes subtle evidence of abnormal esophageal motility is a valuable and underused aspect of esophagoscopy in the evaluation of swallowing disorders. Esophagoscopy has multiple roles in the appraisal and treatment of esophageal motility disorders, including the detection of secondary or pseudoachalasia, placement of manometry catheters, and dilation of peptic strictures caused by GERD associated with disorders such as scleroderma.

Gastroenterologist-administered propofol for therapeutic upper endoscopy with graphic assessment of respiratory activity: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods of sedation and analgesia for advanced endoscopic procedures can be inadequate and frequently prolong recovery room observation. Propofol is a rapidly acting agent that produces an excellent hypnotic state, but its use is typically limited to anesthesiologist-assisted cases because of the inadequacy of current monitoring standards to reliably detect early stages of respiratory depression. METHODS: Ten patients undergoing advanced upper endoscopic procedures (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, esophageal stent placement) received a propofol infusion under the control of a second qualified gastroenterologist with advanced cardiac life support skills. Graphic assessment of respiratory activity was made by using a sidestream carbon dioxide detecting cannula. Patient satisfaction was measured with a 100 mm visual analog scale. Recovery scores were measured by standardized scoring of discharge criteria. RESULTS: Monitoring with graphic assessment of respiratory activity detected early phases of respiratory depression, resulting in a timely decrease in the propofol infusion without significant hypoxemia, hypercapnia, hypotension, or arrhythmias. Satisfaction scores were extremely high (median score 92 of 100) and 9 of 10 patients met discharge criteria at 15 minutes after discontinuation of the propofol infusion. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of monitoring by graphic assessment of respiratory activity, propofol infusion by a second qualified gastroenterologist for prolonged upper endoscopic procedures is safe and results in high levels of patient satisfaction with rapid recovery times.

Sedation and sedationless endoscopy.

Sedation and analgesia are provided routinely for patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. This article reviews the clinical experience with the medications commonly used for this purpose. Furthermore, advantages and disadvantages of alternative agents are also discussed. There are multiple practice guidelines available to the gastrointestinal endoscopist and both the attributes and limitations of these guidelines are presented. In an effort to control costs and improve productivity, sedationless endoscopy has been introduced into the practice of some endoscopists. The advantages and limitations of sedationless endoscopy, as well as the clinical experience to date, are reviewed.

Esophageal diverticula: patient assessment.

Esophageal diverticula are best classified by their anatomic location: pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's diverticula), midthoracic, and epiphrenic. Most diverticula result from esophageal motility disorders. Although some patients are asymptomatic and diverticula are incidental findings, most patients are symptomatic. Dysphagia, regurgitation, and pain are common complaints, however, symptoms are often nonspecific and may be the result of an associated esophageal motility disorder. Contrast radiography is the prime diagnostic tool; evaluation of the diverticulum, associated esophageal abnormalities, and complications are assessed by a barium esophogram. Esophagoscopy adds little to the evaluation of the diverticulum but may be indicated in the assessment of other esophageal abnormalities. Motility studies, which may be difficult or hazardous to perform, are of little use in the diagnosis and treatment of Zenker's diverticula. Manometric evaluation of midthoracic or epiphrenic diverticula usually show an associated motility disorder and may influence treatment decisions.