Opportunities and Challenges for Decentralized Clinical Trial Approaches: European Health Technology Assessment Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approaches are clinical trials in which some or all trial activities take place closer to participants' proximities instead of a traditional investigative site. Data from DCTs may be used for clinical and economic evaluations by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies to support reimbursement decision making. This study aimed to explore the opportunities and challenges for DCT approaches from an HTA perspective by interviewing representatives from European HTA bodies. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 25 European HTA representatives between September 2022 and February 2023, and transcripts were analyzed after thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two main themes were identified from the data relating to (1) DCT approaches in HTA and (2) trial-level acceptance and relevance. Experience with assessing DCTs was limited and a variety of knowledge about DCTs was observed. The respondents recognized the opportunity of DCTs to reduce recall bias when participant-reported outcome data can be collected more frequently and conveniently from home. Concerns were expressed about the data quality when participants become responsible for data collection. Despite this challenge, the respondents recognized the potential of DCTs to increase the generalizability of results because data can be collected in a setting reflective of the everyday situation potentially from a more diverse participant group. CONCLUSIONS: DCTs could generate relevant results for HTA decision making when data are collected in a real-world setting from a diverse participant group. Increased awareness of the opportunities and challenges could help HTA assessors in their appraisal of DCT approaches.

Stakeholders' views on the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs.

BACKGROUND: We explored the views of key stakeholders to identify the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs. A secondary aim was to capture stakeholders' attitudes towards the implementation of pragmatic trials in the drug development process. METHODS: We conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews among individuals from different key stakeholder groups (academia and independent research institutions, the pharmaceutical industry, regulators, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies and patients' organizations) through telephone or face-to-face sessions. Interviews were structured around the question "what challenges were experienced or perceived during the design, conduct and/or review of pragmatic trials." Respondents were additionally asked about their views on implementation of pragmatic trials in the drug development process. Thematic analysis was used to identify the ethically relevant features across data sets. RESULTS: We interviewed 34 stakeholders in 25 individual sessions and four group sessions. The four perceived challenges of ethical relevance were: (1) less controlled conditions creating safety concerns, (2) comparison with usual care potentially compromising clinical equipoise, (3) tailored or waivers of informed consent affecting patient autonomy, and (4) minimal interference with "real-world" practice reducing the knowledge value of trial results. CONCLUSIONS: We identified stakeholder concerns regarding risk assessment, use of suboptimal usual care as a comparator, tailoring of informed consent procedures and ensuring the social value of pragmatic trials. These concerns increased when respondents were asked about pragmatic trials conducted before market authorization.

Patterns of asthma medication use: early asthma therapy initiation and asthma outcomes at age 8.

Wheeze has many underlying pathophysiologies in childhood, but is the main reason for anti-asthma drugs prescription. This study was conducted to describe asthma medication use patterns among children in their first eight years of life. Longitudinal medication use data from 777 children participating in the PIAMA study were used. Medication patterns were described for four groups that started therapy before the third birthday, when the peak in prescriptions occurred in our cohort; short-acting ß-agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), SABA + ICS or none of these. One third (n = 255) of the children received a first SABA or ICS prescription before age 8. Only three children (1.2%) used medication continuously during follow-up. Of the children who started SABA, 53.8% discontinued within 1-2 years. Of the children who started ICS before age 3, 42.1% discontinued within 1-2 years and 31.6% received additional SABA. 41.5% of the children who started SABA + ICS used this short-term (≤1 -2 years) and 21.5% long-term (≥ 3 years). Fifteen percent of children who did not start asthma therapy in their first 3 years of life did receive prescriptions between age 3 and 8. Children prescribed SABA + ICS before age 3 had the highest prevalence of hyper responsiveness at age 8, and similar prevalence of atopy as the other groups. Asthma medication is prescribed frequently in the first 8 years of life, particularly before age 3, and only few children use it continuously. ICS and SABA prescription occurs especially in those who were more likely to develop signs of asthma at age 8.