Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(9): 2925-2934, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044678

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crohn's disease (CD) can lead to work disability with social and economic impacts worldwide. In Brazil, where its prevalence is increasing, we assessed the indirect costs, prevalence, and risk factors for work disability in the state of Rio de Janeiro and in a tertiary care referral center of the state. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the database of the Single System of Social Security Benefits Information, with a cross-check for aid pension and disability retirement. A subanalysis was performed with CD patients followed up at the tertiary care referral center using a prospective CD database, including clinical variables assessed as possible risk factors for work disability. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, the estimated prevalence of CD was 26.05 per 100,000 inhabitants, while the associated work disability was 16.6%, with indirect costs of US$ 8,562,195.86. Permanent disability occurred more frequently in those aged 40 to 49 years. In the referral center, the prevalence of work disability was 16.7%, with a mean interval of 3 years between diagnosis and the first benefit. Risk factors for absence from work were predominantly abdominal surgery, anovaginal fistulas, disease duration, and the A2 profile of the Montreal classification. CONCLUSIONS: In Rio de Janeiro, work disability affects one-sixth of CD patients, and risk factors are associated with disease duration and complications. In the context of increasing prevalence, as this disability compromises young patients after a relatively short period of disease, the socioeconomic burden of CD is expected to increase in the future.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doença de Crohn , Avaliação da Deficiência , Avaliação de Desempenho Profissional , Pensões/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/economia , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/fisiopatologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Avaliação de Desempenho Profissional/métodos , Avaliação de Desempenho Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Previdência Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Surg Endosc ; 24(6): 1280-6, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20033728

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conceivably, the benefits of earlier recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique used in laparoscopic colectomy (LC) may be amplified for patients with comorbid disease. The dearth of evidence supporting the safety of laparoscopy for these patients led to a comparison of outcomes between LC and open colectomy (OC) for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4. METHODS: Data for all ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent elective LC were reviewed from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic database. The patients who underwent LC were matched with OC patients by age, gender, diagnosis, year, and type of surgery. Estimated blood loss, operation time, time to return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and 30-day complication and mortality rates were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In this study, 231 LCs were matched with 231 OCs. The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 234 (51%) of the patients were male. There were 44 (19%) conversions from LC to OC. More patients in the OC group had undergone previous major laparotomy (5 vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss, return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, and total direct costs were decreased in the LC group. Wound infection was significantly greater with OC (p = 0.02). When patients with previous major laparotomy were excluded, the two groups had similar overall morbidity. The other benefits of LC, however, persisted. CONCLUSION: The findings show that LC is a safe option for patients with a high ASA classification. The LC approach is associated with faster postoperative recovery, lower morbidity rates, and lower hospital costs than the OC approach.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Colectomia/métodos , Custos Diretos de Serviços/tendências , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sociedades Médicas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/economia , Doenças do Colo/economia , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparotomia/economia , Laparotomia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Retais/economia , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 52(5): 906-12, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19502855

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years, and the cost-effectiveness gained from percutaneous drainage followed by elective surgery vs. initial surgery for abdominopelvic abscesses related to Crohn's disease. METHODS: All consecutive patients with spontaneous Crohn's disease-related abdominopelvic abscess from 1997 to 2007 were reviewed. The authors excluded postoperative and perirectal abscesses. Decision analysis during one year of patient life was used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years and the cost-effectiveness of each strategy. RESULTS: Of 94 patients, 48 (51 percent) were initially approached with percutaneous drainage. Thirty-one (65 percent) had successful percutaneous drainage and delayed elective surgery. The factors significantly associated with percutaneous drainage failure were steroid use, colonic phenotype, and multiple or multilocular abscesses. The initial treatment was surgery in the remaining 46 (49 percent) patients. The initial approach with percutaneous drainage gave higher quality-adjusted life-years and was more cost-effective than initial surgery. Percutaneous drainage was the optimal strategy in spite of the risk of failure and septic complications within the plausible range. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage failure is associated with steroid use, colonic phenotype, and multiple or multilocular abscesses. When feasible, percutaneous drainage is the most effective strategy from the perspective of patients and third-party payers.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/economia , Abscesso Abdominal/terapia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Drenagem/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA