Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in France: Analysis of French nationwide health insurance database.

AIM: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have been commercialized in France for type 2 diabetes since April 2020 and later for heart and renal diseases. Given the recent developments in treating diabetes and the widening of SGLT-2i indications, we aimed to study changes in the use of glucose-lowering drugs in France and to characterize SGLT-2i new users. METHODS: We performed a nationwide utilization study using the French health insurance database. Trends in incidence and prevalence of glucose-lowering drug use were assessed by a repeated cross-sectional study in 2019 and 2021. A cohort study of incident SGLT-2i users was then conducted to describe patient characteristics and the strategy for treating diabetes. RESULTS: The prevalence of SGLT-2i use gradually reached 0.1% in the third quarter of 2021 and increased more significantly to 0.2% thereafter. SGLT-2i became the second most prescribed glucose-lowering drug class after metformin at the end of 2021 (0.1%). Among the cohort of 125 387 SGLT-2i new users (mean age 65.0 years; 60.1% of men), 87.6% presented a diabetic comorbidity. The patient profile changed over the study period with an increasing proportion of patients with cardiovascular (28.7% in 2020 vs. 40.2% in 2021) or renal (7.7% in 2020 vs. 11.8% in 2021) comorbidities at initiation. The main combinations used at SGLT-2i initiation were metformin (12.5%) and metformin plus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (8.1%). One-year probability of SGLT-2i persistence was estimated to be 55%. CONCLUSION: The expansion of indications for SGLT-2i and the broadening of the target population make it essential to assess the reasons for discontinuation and review their safety profile.

[Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice]. / Réalisation d'études pharmacoépidémiologiques à partir du système national des données de santé (SNDS) : application des recommandations dans la pratique.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendationswhen using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.

Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendations when using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.