Structure, quality and accessibility of the Dutch acne healthcare; a care providers' perspective.

Background: Despite the wide range of available treatment modalities a delay between the first outbreak of acne vulgaris and an effective treatment outcome is experienced by many patients. Considering the growing incentives to improve patient satisfaction and quality of care while reducing healthcare costs, insights into the structure, quality and accessibility of acne healthcare services beyond guidelines are therefore needed.Objective: To provide insights into the structure, quality and accessibility of acne healthcare services.Methods: A qualitative study was conducted according to the principles of 'situational analysis'. The Dutch acne healthcare system was taken as an illustrative example. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted among representatives of the 4 main Dutch professions providing acne care. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed.Results: Multiple facilitators and barriers emerged from the interviews. Identified facilitators were care providers delivering personalized patient care and having a positive attitude toward formalized multidisciplinary care delivery. A lack of streamlined referral pathways and standardization in acne severity-assessment, financial aspects and unfamiliarity with the content and added value of other acne care professionals were identified as barriers. Further research is recommended to investigate how de-medicalisation, the gatekeepers role, and the impact of location and work setting influence the quality of and accessibility to care.Conclusions: Identified facilitators and barriers and an overall positive attitude of care providers toward multidisciplinary care provision provides opportunities for the utilization of future guidelines involving streamlined referral pathways and good working arrangements between all acne care providing professions.

A European subset analysis from the population-based Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis shows country-specific features: results from psoriasis patients in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) survey data were not analysed to account for cultural and healthcare system differences across European countries (EC). OBJECTIVE: To utilize MAPP data to characterize psoriasis in Spanish patients, including severity assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). METHODS: The MAPP survey was conducted between June and August 2012. This analysis included 1700 patients with self-reported psoriasis (without psoriatic arthritis) from France (n = 349), Germany (n = 311), Italy (n = 359), Spain (n = 354) and the United Kingdom (n = 327). RESULTS: Patients from Spain vs. other EC self-reported higher mean body mass index (26.9 vs. 25.6, P ≤ 0.001), lower prevalence of depression (6% vs. 12%, P = 0.002) and higher mean self-perceived psoriasis severity at its worst (5.92 vs. 5.33, P < 0.001) despite lower estimated body-surface-area involvement. Overall, patients from Spain vs. other EC had lower mean global DLQI scores (4.70 vs. 6.06, P = 0.001) and lower mean scores for each DLQI dimension [all P < 0.001, except leisure (P = 0.002), treatment (P = 0.002), and work and school (P = 0.005)]. Higher DLQI values were inversely associated with age and directly correlated with perceived severity. Palmoplantar, nail and scalp psoriasis were reported less frequently in Spanish patients (P = 0.026) and were associated with higher DLQI values (P < 0.01). Spanish patients were more likely to have seen multiple healthcare providers (HCPs; P < 0.001) and achieve therapeutic goals (P < 0.001), but current treatments were similar to patients in other EC. CONCLUSIONS: In the MAPP survey, Spanish patients differed from other EC in several characteristics, including comorbidities, extent and distribution of psoriasis lesions, perception of severity and impact on quality of life. Their perception of psoriasis severity was higher despite a lower estimated extent, and DLQI scores were significantly lower. Spanish patients had more HCP visits and a higher rate of therapeutic goal achievement. These differences might be attributed to cultural factors, phenotypical variation and differences in HCP access.

Comparison of the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index in assessment of quality of life in patients with psoriasis aged 16-17 years.

BACKGROUND: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) are widely used to assess quality of life (QoL) in adults (≥ 16 years) and children (4-16 years) with psoriasis. In the age group 16-17 years, it is not known whether DLQI and CDLQI reflect QoL impairment in the same way. OBJECTIVES: To compare DLQI and CDLQI scores in patients with psoriasis aged 16-17 years. METHODS: Patients with psoriasis aged 16-17 years were asked to complete both the DLQI and CDLQI. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included. There was a high correlation between DLQI and CDLQI scores (r = 0·90, P < 0·001). The mean DLQI score (5·41 ± 5·20) was lower than the mean CDLQI (6·61 ± 5·74) (P < 0·001). The major part of this difference (∆0·61) was caused by the low score regarding sexual difficulties in the DLQI (0·11 ± 0·49) and the high score concerning sleep in the CDLQI (0·71 ± 0·93). In addition, the question related to sports scored 0·34 in the DLQI but 0·86 in the CDLQI (∆0·52). The question related to work/study in the DLQI scored lower than the question on school/holiday in the CDLQI (∆0·41). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with psoriasis aged 16-17 years, DLQI and CDLQI scores closely correlate, but the mean DLQI score was lower than the mean CDLQI score. This was caused primarily by differences in the answers to questions regarding sexual difficulties and sleep. As the QoL impacts experienced by people aged 16-17 may differ from those experienced by children or adults, QoL measures designed for use in this age range may have advantages over both child- and adult-specific measures.

Physician perspectives in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: results from the population-based Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis survey.

BACKGROUND: Available literature on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) demonstrates a tremendous burden of disease and suggests underdiagnosis and undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: To obtain real-world physician perspectives on the impact of psoriasis and PsA and its treatment on patients' daily lives, including perceptions of, and satisfaction with, current therapies. METHODS: The Multinational Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (MAPP) surveyed dermatologists (n = 391) and rheumatologists (n = 390) in North America (Canada and the United States) and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom). RESULTS: Dermatologists classified 20.3% and 25.7% of their patients as having severe psoriasis and severe PsA respectively; rheumatologists indicated that 48.4% of their PsA patients had active disease. Of the psoriasis patients complaining of joint pain, only 33.0% had a diagnosis of PsA. An impact on daily activities or social/emotional well-being was recognized by 57.2% to 79.3% of physicians. In patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, dermatologists reported 74.9% were receiving topical therapy, 19.5% conventional oral therapy and 19.6% biologics. Dermatologists and rheumatologists reported similar rates of topical (≈45%) and biologic (≈30%) therapy utilization for their PsA patients; conventional oral therapy was more often prescribed by rheumatologists (63.4%) vs. dermatologists (35.2%). Reasons for not initiating or maintaining systemic therapies were related to concerns about long-term safety, tolerability, efficacy and costs (biologics). CONCLUSION: Physicians in North America and Europe caring for patients with psoriasis and PsA acknowledge unmet treatment needs, largely concerning long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of currently available therapies; evidence suggests underdiagnosis of PsA and undertreatment of psoriasis among dermatologists.

Summary of the Dutch S3-guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis 2011. Dutch Society of Dermatology and Venereology.

This document provides a summary of the Dutch S3-guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis. These guidelines were finalized in December 2011 and contain unique chapters on the treatment of psoriasis of the face and flexures, childhood psoriasis as well as the patient's perspective on treatment. They also cover the topical treatment of psoriasis, photo(chemo)therapy, conventional systemic therapy and biological therapy.

The economic impact of high-need psoriasis in daily clinical practice before and after the introduction of biologics.

BACKGROUND: Although costs of biologics are high, effective treatment of patients with psoriasis may reduce the total health care costs, as it may limit the need for hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the economic impact of psoriasis, including direct costs, before and after the introduction of biologics, with special focus on hospitalized patients, treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction with medication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive retrospective cohort study including 67 patients with high-need psoriasis was done. Direct costs were investigated for the biologic and pre-biologic period. Direct costs for a subgroup of hospitalized patients were analysed separately. Patient satisfaction with biologic treatment was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version II. Effectiveness of biologic therapy was investigated by means of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). RESULTS: Mean total direct costs were €10,146 per patient per year (PPPY) in the pre-biologic treatment period, compared with €17,712 PPPY in the biologic treatment period. For six patients in the cohort, introduction of biologics led to a reduction of direct costs, as these patients did not need long hospitalizations. Treatment with biologics led to a decrease in PASI from 19·0 at the start of biologic therapy to 6·4 at analysis (66·4%). Patient satisfaction with biologics was high, indicated by a mean TSQM score of 77·8. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of biologic therapies may have cost-neutral or cost-saving effects for patients who otherwise require long hospitalization periods. Treatment with biologics proved effective and was accompanied by high satisfaction for the patients.

The Impact of Chronic Skin Disease on Daily Life (ISDL): a generic and dermatology-specific health instrument.

BACKGROUND: In dermatological research and clinical practice, there is a need for comprehensive self-report instruments that assess a broad spectrum of health implications of chronic skin diseases, including generic and skin-specific aspects of disease-related quality of life. The advantages of dermatology-specific, multidimensional instruments over generic instruments or single-dimensional quality-of-life measures are in the detailed and specific information they provide about health areas that are affected by the skin condition and that may change through therapeutic intervention. OBJECTIVES: The development of a multidimensional health status inventory for chronic skin diseases (Impact of Chronic Skin Disease on Daily Life, ISDL) is described. The dermatology-specific part of the inventory assesses dimensions of physical functioning, more specifically skin status, physical symptoms of itch, pain and fatigue and scratching responses as well as disease-related stressors like stigmatization. The generic part gauges dimensions of psychological functioning, disease-related impact, illness cognitions and social support by means of existing scales validated for other chronic diseases. METHODS: Reliability and validity of the questionnaire were studied in various samples of patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: The ISDL showed high reliability and test-retest reliability in both patient groups. Convergent validity was indicated by moderate to strong correlations with other validated questionnaires. The scales proved sensitive to change both for dermatological ultraviolet B radiation therapy and cognitive behavioural treatment for itching. CONCLUSION: With its convincing results for reliability and validity the present evaluation supports the usefulness and applicability of the instrument for different chronic skin diseases.

[Initiatives to increase the efficiency of dermatological patient care]. / Initiatieven tot verhoogde doelmatigheid van de dermatologische patiëntenzorg.

The number of tasks required of dermatologists has increased in the last decade. This article discusses potential ways to enhance the efficiency ofdermatological patient care and prevent problems of capacity. A study conducted in the UK found that, for the top 10 skin disorders, the accessibility of general practitioners with special expertise in dermatology was better than that of the dermatology clinic. Waiting times were considerably shorter with the general practitioners, but care was more expensive. Outcomes were similar for these skin disorders in terms of disease-specific quality of life. The study made no comment on the actual diagnostic ability of the specialised general practitioners. Teledermatology can reduce the number of referrals to a dermatologist by half. However, a considerable percentage of teledermatological consultations result in a different diagnosis than that obtained during a standard 'in vivo' consultation. Teledermatology can be a useful option for the follow-up of patients with ulcus cruris. The efficiency of dermatological care can be increased by working in teams. Dermatological nurses can be trained and conduct their own consultations under the supervision of a dermatologist. Dermatological care can also be organised in regional cooperative groups with general practitioners. Within these groups, teledermatology and specialised dermatology training for general practitioners can be useful innovations.

Assessment of epidermal subpopulations and proliferation in healthy skin, symptomless and lesional skin of spreading psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The margin zone in spreading psoriatic lesions has frequently been used as a model to study the changes in epidermal proliferation, keratinization and inflammation during the transition from symptomless to lesional skin. However, the dynamics of the changes in the epidermal subpopulations-basal cells, transit amplifying cells and differentiated cells-have not been studied in the transition between symptomless and lesional skin. OBJECTIVES: To quantify in a dynamic model of the margin zone in psoriasis the characteristics of these subpopulations with respect to epidermal proliferation and differentiation. METHODS: From seven patients with active psoriasis, biopsies were taken from the distant uninvolved skin, outer margin, inner margin and centre of a spreading psoriatic plaque. Frozen sections were labelled immunofluorescently using direct immunofluorescence for Ki-67 and beta1 integrin and the Zenon labelling technique for keratin 6, 10 and 15. Digital photographs of the stained sections were quantitatively analysed. RESULTS: In the distant uninvolved skin the expression of beta1 integrin was decreased and keratin 15 expression was lost. In this area suprabasal cells expressed beta1 integrin and in the outer margin suprabasal cells expressed Ki-67. From the outer to the inner margin of the psoriasis plaque, which coincided with the appearance of the clinical lesion, there was a significant change in the various markers. The patchy expression of keratin 6 in the inner margin became homogeneous in the centre of the psoriasis plaque and here was also coexpression of keratin 6 and keratin 10 in a single cell. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides additional evidence that the distant uninvolved skin has a prepsoriatic phenotype, which is the first step in a psoriatic cascade. The cascade between symptomless and lesional skin comprises first an abnormality in inflammation with involvement of beta1 integrin-dim cells (transit amplifying cells) subsequently eliciting an enlarged germinative compartment with increased recruitment of cycling epidermal cells and focal expression of proliferation-associated keratins, ultimately culminating in a more-or-less homogeneous epidermis with massive recruitment of cycling epidermal cells and proliferation-associated keratinization.

An immunohistochemical assessment of the response of the psoriatic lesion to single and repeated applications of high-dose dithranol cream.

Dithranol, although a time-honoured treatment and from the beginning of the previous century still going strong, remains an empirical treatment. There is growing evidence that the biochemical basis for the mechanism of action of dithranol at the molecular level is related to the redox activity leading to the production of active oxygen species, which include singlet oxygen, superoxide anion radical and hydroxyl radical. Some authors suggest that epidermal proliferation and/or keratinisation may be the target for dithranol, while others refer to aspects of cutaneous inflammation as crucial in the antipsoriatic effect of dithranol. The present study aims to analyse the effect of single and repeated applications of dithranol on aspects of epidermal proliferation, keratinisation and inflammation in the psoriatic plaque. The most marked effect of dithranol proved to be that on epidermal proliferation (the number of Ki-67-positive nuclei) with an early reduction already 1 day following the single application. This reduction lasted for 16 days. However, such an application induced only a modest clinical improvement. Repeated challenges, resulting in a decrease in the number of Ki-67-positive nuclei of 66%, led to a substantial clinical improvement after 12 days. Repeated challenges resulted in a significant reduction of the number of polymorphonuclear leucocytes. However, this reduction was less pronounced as compared to the effect on epidermal proliferation. It is concluded that epidermal proliferation is a sensitive marker to demonstrate an early effect of dithranol. The dynamics of the cell-biological responses suggest that intermittent applications might be a promising new approach. As dithranol does not reduce the number of T lymphocytes, it is attractive to speculate that the combination of dithranol with immunosuppressive treatments might be a very effective combination.

The response of uninvolved skin of patients with psoriasis to single and repeated applications of dithranol cream: an immunohistochemical assessment.

Dithranol is one of the most effective topical treatments for patients with psoriasis. The well-known irritation is a serious limitation. In an earlier study we investigated the inflammatory response to single and repeated applications with dithranol 2% cream in skin from healthy volunteers. In the present study, we assessed the clinical and cell-biological response of single and repeated challenges with dithranol 2% cream in uninvolved skin of patients with psoriasis. A striking difference between the two studies is the late phase in the single-challenge group after 8 days, showing a longer-lasting response in the uninvolved skin compared to normal skin with respect to proliferation and inflammation markers. A controlled and synchronised irritation by dithranol might induce anti-inflammatory processes and as such constitute an antipsoriatic principle. It is attractive to speculate that in psoriasis the induction of anti-inflammatory responses is defective. Following repeated applications of dithranol, a more uniform course of proliferation, differentiation and inflammation markers was observed in the uninvolved psoriatic skin as compared to the skin of healthy volunteers. Again a defect in the induction of anti-inflammatory responses might account for this event. In view of these differences between normal skin and psoriatic uninvolved skin, it may be advisable to use the uninvolved skin of patients with psoriasis in further studies on the interference between dithranol irritancy and various anti-inflammatory agents.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a psoriasis care instruction programme with dithranol compared with UVB phototherapy and inpatient dithranol treatment.

BACKGROUND: This study was part of a large national cost-effectiveness analysis, and was funded by the National Fund for Investigational Medicine of the Health Care Insurance Board. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis by dithranol short contact therapy in a care instruction programme (short contact therapy) with ultraviolet B phototherapy (UVB) and inpatient dithranol treatment (inpatient treatment), and relate these costs to treatment effectiveness. METHODS: An open randomized controlled multicentre study was performed. The costs (both medical and non-medical) were calculated for the following periods: during treatment, per month during remission, after a relapse, and following an unsuccessful treatment. The effectiveness measures were the clinical response rate and the number of clearance days during follow-up. RESULTS: The data from 216 patients were analysed. The mean overall costs per patient during treatment were euro;1641, euro;1258 and euro;7706 for short contact treatment, UVB and inpatient treatment, respectively. During the clearance period the mean costs per month per patient were euro;19, euro;5 and euro;25, respectively. The clinical response rates were 57%, 57% and 85%, respectively. The mean number of clearance-days after short contact treatment was 160 [median 119; interquartile range (0-357)], which was not significantly different from the other two strategies: 211 clearance-days after inpatient treatment [241 (99-350)] and 136 clearance-days after UVB [81 (0-266)]. CONCLUSIONS: Short contact treatment is an attractive alternative for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis currently treated by inpatient treatment, as the costs of short contact treatment were significantly lower and the number of clearance days was comparable. Considering the higher costs, short contact treatment is not a first choice treatment when compared with UVB.

The response of normal human skin to single and repeated applications of dithranol cream: an immunohistochemical assessment.

The irritative response of uninvolved skin is a serious limitation of dithranol therapy in psoriasis. A characterisation in cell biological terms may be helpful in finding an effective counteraction to this well-known irritation. Therefore, we studied the effect of single and repeated applications of dithranol on normal human skin. Besides a clinical evaluation, we studied aspects of epidermal proliferation, differentiation and inflammation. On day 2, after single dithranol challenge, we observed an induction of both the cornified envelope precursor protein involucrin and the cross-linking enzyme transglutaminase I. Subsequently, epidermal hyperproliferation was observed with a maximum on day 8. The epidermal response to dithranol appears to be a reinforcement of the barrier function. Remarkably, however, filaggrin was found to be decreased. Profilaggrin breakdown might be an attempt to compensate for xerosis of uninvolved skin that accompanies dithranol therapy. T lymphocytes and to a lesser extent polymorphonucleocytes were found to be significantly increased. The reduction of Langerhans cells suggests a dose-dependent toxic effect of dithranol or one of its metabolites on Langerhans cells. The dynamics in the induction of changes after repeated challenge are comparable with those after single challenge. However, the induction of hyperproliferation following repeated application appeared to continue between day 8 and 12. Based on the dynamics of dithranol-induced irritation, it may be of interest to study the efficacy of intermittent dithranol treatment. Our results indicate that an optimal timing for biopsies in future dithranol irritation studies lies between 4 and 8 days after the first dithranol challenge.

Flow cytometric assessment of clearance and relapse characteristics in psoriasis vulgaris after treatment with weekly clobetasol lotion under hydrocolloid occlusion versus twice-daily clobetasol ointment.

Clearance and relapse characteristics of clobetasol lotion under hydrocolloid occlusion once weekly versus clobetasol ointment twice daily were assessed in a comparative flow cytometric study. Quantitative analysis of markers for epidermal proliferation, differentiation and inflammation was performed on epidermal single cell suspensions prepared from 3-mm punch biopsies taken from 15 patients with psoriasis vulgaris before therapy, at clearance and 6 weeks after clearance. After treatment both therapy regimens resulted in substantial changes of all flow cytometric parameters, but clearance was induced earlier in the corticosteroid under hydrocolloid occlusion-treated group. With respect to the relapse phase no difference was observed between both treatments. Although it is remotely possible that the outcome in the treatment of more extensive psoriatic lesions might be different, the present study suggests that the robust clinical efficacy of the treatment with a topical corticosteroid under hydrocolloid occlusion is not associated with a rebound phenomenon.