Relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status and venous thromboembolism: results from a population-based study.

Essentials Literature on socioeconomic status (SES) and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is scarce. We assessed neighborhood SES with VTE risk in a population of over 1.4 million inhabitants. Higher neighborhood SES was associated with lower incidence of VTE. These findings are helpful to inform policy and resource allocation in health systems. SUMMARY: Background The association between socioeconomic status and arterial cardiovascular disease is well established. However, despite its high burden of disability-adjusted life years, little research has been carried out to determine whether socioeconomic status is associated with venous thromboembolism. Objective To determine if neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with venous thromboembolism in a population-based study from the Netherlands. Methods We identified all patients aged 15 years and older with a first event of venous thromboembolism from inhabitants who lived in the urban districts of The Hague, Leiden and Utrecht in the Netherlands in 2008-2012. Neighborhood socioeconomic status was based on the status score, which combines educational level, income and unemployment on a four-digit postal code level. Incidence rate ratios of venous thromboembolism were calculated for different levels of neighborhood socioeconomic status, with adjustments for age and sex. Results A total of 7373 patients with a first venous thromboembolism (median age 61 years; 50% deep vein thrombosis) were identified among more than 1.4 million inhabitants. Higher neighborhood SES was associated with lower incidence of VTE. In the two highest status score groups (i.e. the 95-99th and > 99th percentile), the adjusted incidence rate ratios were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.00) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93), respectively, compared with the reference status score group (i.e. 30-70th percentile). Conclusions High neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with a lower risk of first venous thromboembolism.

The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted anticoagulant dosage: results from the European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA) multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Increased demand for oral anticoagulation has resulted in wider adoption of computer-assisted dosing in anticoagulant clinics. An economic evaluation has been performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted dosing in comparison with manual dosing in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted as part of the EAA randomized study of computer-assisted dosage vs. manual dosing. The 4.5-year multinational trial was conducted in 32 centres with 13 219 anticoagulation patients randomized to manual or computer-assisted dosage. The main outcome measures were total health care costs, clinical event rates and cost-saving per clinical event prevented by computer dosing compared with manual dosing. RESULTS: Mean dosing costs per patient were lower (difference: euro47) for computer-assisted dosing, but with little difference in clinical event costs. Total overall costs were euro51 lower in the computer-assisted dosing arm. There were a larger number of clinical events in the manual dosing arm. The overall difference between trial arms was not significant (difference in clinical events, -0.003; 95% CI, -0.010-0.004) but there was a significant reduction in events with DVT/PE, suggesting computer-assisted dosage with the two study programs (dawn ac or parma 5) was at least as effective clinically as manual dosage. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that computer-assisted dosing is less costly than manual dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that computer-assisted dosage with the two programs (dawn ac and parma 5) is cheaper than manual dosage and is at least as effective clinically, indicating that investment in this technology represents value for money.

Diagnostic strategy for the assessment of rheumatoid vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical features associated with histologically proven rheumatoid vasculitis (HRV) and the additional diagnostic value of serological markers in an inception cohort of 81 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suspected of RV. METHODS: The presence and number of recently developed extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) and a weighted EAM score, as well as the levels of serological markers, were compared between 31 patients with RA with histologically proven vasculitis and 50 patients with RA in whom vasculitis could not be documented histologically. The following markers were evaluated: circulating immune complexes, complement components C3 and C4, class-specific rheumatoid factors (IgM RF, IgG RF, IgA RF), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, antiendothelial antibodies, circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and -3, circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule and E-selectin, cellular fibronectin, von Willebrand factor antigen, and C reactive protein. The diagnostic value of these markers, in addition to the clinical features, was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Peripheral neuropathy or purpura/petechiae, or both, were the most important clinical features to discriminate patients with RA with and without histologically proven RV. The presence of a high number of EAMs and a higher weighted EAM score in patients with RA suspected of vasculitis were also associated with an increased probability of histologically proven RV. After adjustment for EAMs, only the combination of an increased serum IgA RF level and a decreased serum C3 level appeared to make an additional contribution to the diagnosis histologically proven RV. Evidence of systemic vasculitis was found in a muscle biopsy of the rectus femoris in 9/14 (64%) patients with vasculitis with neuropathy and in 3/11 (27%) patients with purpura/petechiae and vasculitis of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: In the diagnostic process of RV the presence of peripheral neuropathy and/or purpura/petechiae or a high weighted EAM score will increase the probability of histologically proven RV. Of the circulating factors previously suggested to be markers for RV only IgA RF and C3 further increase the probability of histologically proven RV and may be useful to guide diagnostic decisions.

Assessment of a bleeding risk index in two cohorts of patients treated with oral anticoagulants.

In two cohorts of patients on oral anticoagulant therapy, routinely treated by the Leiden Thrombosis Service, the frequency of major bleeding complications was assessed during two years (1988 and 1991). With Poisson regression analysis the influence of the risk factors age, sex, target zone, achieved INR and type of coumarin derivative used were determined. Subsequently, a bleeding risk index was calculated, combining the results of the two cohorts. For various types of patients the relative risk of major bleeding complications was assessed. Age and achieved INR were the most important and consistent risk factors: rate ratio (RR) for age in 1988 1.46 per 10 years increase (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.78) and in 1991 1.57 per 10 years increase (95% CI 1.23-2.00); RR per unit increase in achieved INR in 1988 1.42 (95% CI 1.21-1.68) and in 1991 1.44 per unit increase in achieved INR (95% CI 1.18-1.74). Two methods were used to combine the results of 1988 and 1991. In the first method the mean bleeding risk index was calculated: In (incidence) [natural logarithm of the incidence rate of major bleeding] = -5.64+ 0.42 * age +0.26 * sex -0.29 * target range +0.36 * achieved INR -0.36 * coumarin type. In the second method only the consistent risk factors age and achieved INR were used: In (incidence) = -5.64 -0.42 * age +0.36 * achieved INR. These bleeding risk indexes can be used to assess the risk of major bleeding complications of individual patients and allow more individualized care by individual tailoring the desired anticoagulation.

Assessment of therapeutic quality control in a long-term anticoagulant trial in post-myocardial infarction patients.

Various methods have been described to evaluate efficacy of anticoagulant therapy using the international normalized ratio (INR). We compared the following approaches: (1) total INR's or the most recent measurement; (2) percent time within therapeutic range, with INR changing directly or halfway between visits; and (3) total observation time assuming INR changing linearly. The study population comprised 1700 post myocardial infarction patients. Treatment comprised 3725 patient-years. There were 61,471 INR assessments with target therapeutic level of 2.8-4.8. Acenocoumarol as well as phenprocoumon were employed. Therapeutic achievement in the first months of treatment was low: less than 60% of INR's were in range. Treatment stabilized after 6 months. Patients on acenocoumarol were within range 70% of the time compared to 80% for phenprocoumon. Method 3 is preferred because it incorporates time and is capable of calculating incidence rates at different INR levels. Our findings call for an urgent improvement of standard of anticoagulant control in the first months following commencement of treatment.