Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J. bras. econ. saúde (Impr.) ; 13(1): 31-42, Abril/2021.
Artigo em Português | LILACS, ECOS | ID: biblio-1252695

RESUMO

Objetivo: Descrever e analisar criticamente as avaliações econômicas de medicamentos antineoplásicos submetidas à Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) durante o processo de atualização do rol de procedimentos em saúde 2020. Métodos: Estudo transversal de análise crítica dos estudos de avaliação econômica integrantes da documentação submetida à ANS com o objetivo de incorporação no rol de procedimentos. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica foi realizada por meio da ferramenta Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 da Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Resultados: Foram incluídas 49 avaliações econômicas: 22 estudos de custo-efetividade, 10 estudos de custo-utilidade, três estudos de custo-minimização e 14 estudos de custo-efetividade e custo-utilidade. A qualidade metodológica foi considerada, na maior parte (88%), como aceitável ou de baixa qualidade. Conclusão: Estudos de avaliação econômica são fundamentais no processo decisório de incorporação de tecnologias na saúde suplementar. Esta análise crítica sugere que a qualidade dos estudos econômicos apresentados dentro das propostas de incorporação de antineoplásicos durante o processo de atualização do rol 2020 da ANS foi limitada. Inconsistências metodológicas e falta de um relato transparente reduzem a validade e a aplicabilidade dos achados na tomada de decisão.


Objective: To describe and critically appraise the economic evaluations of antineoplastic drugs submitted to the ANS during the process of updating its 2020' list of procedures. Methods: Cross-sectional study of critical analysis of the economic evaluation studies included in the documentation submitted to the ANS with the aim of incorporating them into the list of procedures. The methodological quality assessment was carried out using the Methodology Checklist 6: Economic Evaluations Version 3.0 of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Results: Overall, 49 economic evaluations were included: 22 cost-effectiveness studies, 10 cost-utility studies, three cost-minimization studies and 14 mixed economic studies. Methodological quality was mostly considered as acceptable or low quality. Conclusion: Economic evaluation studies are fundamental in the decision-making process of incorporating technologies into supplementary health care. This critical appraisal suggests that the quality of the economic studies presented within the proposals to incorporate antineoplastics during the process of updating the ANS 2020 roll was limited. Methodological inconsistencies and lack of transparent reporting reduce the validity and applicability of findings for decision-making


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Economia e Organizações de Saúde , Avaliação de Custo-Efetividade , Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos
2.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 342-352, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33656910

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Delays and disruptions in health systems because of the COVID-19 pandemic were identified by a previous systematic review from our group. For improving the knowledge about the pandemic consequences for cancer care, this article aims to identify the effects of mitigation strategies developed to reduce the impact of such delays and disruptions. METHODS: Systematic review with a comprehensive search including formal databases, cancer and COVID-19 data sources, gray literature, and manual search. We considered clinical trials, observational longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies, before-and-after studies, case series, and case studies. The selection, data extraction, and methodological assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by specific tools. The mitigation strategies identified were described in detail and their effects were summarized narratively. RESULTS: Of 6,692 references reviewed, 28 were deemed eligible, and 9 studies with low to moderate methodological quality were included. Five multiple strategies and four single strategies were reported, and the possible effects of mitigating delays and disruptions in cancer care because of COVID-19 are inconsistent. The only comparative study reported a 48.7% reduction observed in the number of outpatient visits to the hospital accompanied by a small reduction in imaging and an improvement in radiation treatments after the implementation of a multiple organizational strategy. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasize the infrequency of measuring and reporting mitigation strategies that specifically address patients' outcomes and thus a scarcity of high-quality evidence to inform program development. This review reinforces the need of adopting standardized measurement methods to monitor the impact of the mitigation strategies proposed to reduce the effects of delays and disruptions in cancer health care because of COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Institutos de Câncer , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Oncologia/tendências , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Oncologia/organização & administração , Modelos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pandemias , Tempo para o Tratamento
3.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 7: 311-323, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617304

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There has been noteworthy concern about the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on health services including the management of cancer. In addition to being considered at higher risk for worse outcomes from COVID-19, people with cancer may also experience disruptions or delays in health services. This systematic review aimed to identify the delays and disruptions to cancer services globally. METHODS: This is a systematic review with a comprehensive search including specific and general databases. We considered any observational longitudinal and cross-sectional study design. The selection, data extraction, and methodological assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by specific tools. The delays and disruptions identified were categorized, and their frequency was presented. RESULTS: Among the 62 studies identified, none exhibited high methodological quality. The most frequent determinants for disruptions were provider- or system-related, mainly because of the reduction in service availability. The studies identified 38 different categories of delays and disruptions with impact on treatment, diagnosis, or general health service. Delays or disruptions most investigated included reduction in routine activity of cancer services and number of cancer surgeries; delay in radiotherapy; and delay, reschedule, or cancellation of outpatient visits. Interruptions and disruptions largely affected facilities (up to 77.5%), supply chain (up to 79%), and personnel availability (up to 60%). CONCLUSION: The remarkable frequency of delays and disruptions in health care mostly related to the reduction of the COVID-19 burden unintentionally posed a major risk on cancer care worldwide. Strategies can be proposed not only to mitigate the main delays and disruptions but also to standardize their measurement and reporting. As a high number of publications continuously are being published, it is critical to harmonize the upcoming reports and constantly update this review.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/cirurgia
4.
Environ Int ; 146: 106205, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33189992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing Joint Estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates), with contributions from a large network of experts. Evidence from mechanistic data suggests that exposure to long working hours may increase alcohol consumption and cause alcohol use disorder. In this paper, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years from alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorder that are attributable to exposure to long working hours, for the development of the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of exposure to long working hours (three categories: 41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on alcohol consumption, risky drinking (three outcomes: prevalence, incidence and mortality) and alcohol use disorder (three outcomes: prevalence, incidence and mortality). DATA SOURCES: We developed and published a protocol, applying the Navigation Guide as an organizing systematic review framework where feasible. We searched electronic bibliographic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including the WHO International Clinical Trials Register, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and CISDOC on 30 June 2018. Searches on PubMed were updated on 18 April 2020. We also searched electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational websites; hand-searched reference list of previous systematic reviews and included study records; and consulted additional experts. STUDY ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA: We included working-age (≥15 years) workers in the formal and informal economy in any WHO and/or ILO Member State but excluded children (<15 years) and unpaid domestic workers. We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and other non-randomized intervention studies with an estimate of the effect of exposure to long working hours (41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on alcohol consumption (in g/week), risky drinking, and alcohol use disorder (prevalence, incidence or mortality). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: At least two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria at a first stage and full texts of potentially eligible records at a second stage, followed by extraction of data from publications related to qualifying studies. Two or more review authors assessed the risk of bias, quality of evidence and strength of evidence, using Navigation Guide and GRADE tools and approaches adapted to this project. RESULTS: Fourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 104,599 participants (52,107 females) in six countries of three WHO regions (Americas, South-East Asia, and Europe). The exposure and outcome were assessed with self-reported measures in most studies. Across included studies, risk of bias was generally probably high, with risk judged high or probably high for detection bias and missing data for alcohol consumption and risky drinking. Compared to working 35-40 h/week, exposure to working 41-48 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 10.4 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.59-15.20; seven studies; 25,904 participants, I2 71%, low quality evidence). Exposure to working 49-54 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 17.69 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.16-26.22; seven studies, 19,158 participants, I2 82%, low quality evidence). Exposure to working ≥55 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 16.29 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.93-24.65; seven studies; 19,692 participants; I2 82%, low quality evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of exposure to working 41-48 h/week, compared with working 35-40 h/week on developing risky drinking (relative risk 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.36; 12 studies; I2 52%, low certainty evidence). Working 49-54 h/week did not increase the risk of developing risky drinking (relative risk 1.12; 95% CI 0.90-1.39; 12 studies; 3832 participants; I2 24%, moderate certainty evidence), nor working ≥55 h/week (relative risk 1.11; 95% CI 0.95-1.30; 12 studies; 4525 participants; I2 0%, moderate certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses indicated that age may influence the association between long working hours and both alcohol consumption and risky drinking. We did not identify studies for which we had access to results on alcohol use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, for alcohol consumption in g/week and for risky drinking, we judged this body of evidence to be of low certainty. Exposure to long working hours may have increased alcohol consumption, but we are uncertain about the effect on risky drinking. We found no eligible studies on the effect on alcohol use disorder. Producing estimates for the burden of alcohol use disorder attributable to exposure to long working hours appears to not be evidence-based at this time. PROTOCOL IDENTIFIER: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.025. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018084077.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Adolescente , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
6.
Cad. Ibero Am. Direito Sanit. (Impr.) ; 8(3): 48-59, jul.-set. 2019.
Artigo em Português | LILACS, ColecionaSUS, CONASS | ID: biblio-1022852

RESUMO

Objetivo: discutir o processo regulatório de medicamentos para doenças raras no Brasil, com base no caso Zolgensma®, e avaliar criticamente as evidências disponíveis até o momento sobre a eficácia e a segurança do Zolgensma® no tratamento da atrofia muscular espinhal (AME). Metodologia: estudo descritivo realizado no Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital Sírio-Libanês (NATS-HSL) em junho de 2019. Resultados: em abril de 2019, o uso do Zolgensma® para AME foi regulamentado nos Estados Unidos com base em dois estudos clínicos abertos (sem mascaramento), sem grupo comparador paralelo (e, portanto, não randomizados). Essas limitações metodológicas aumentam a incerteza nos resultados encontrados. A Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) aprovou estratégias para regulamentar o processo e os prazos de análise das submissões de registro de novos medicamentos para doenças raras, caso do Zolgensma®. Conclusão: faz-se necessário ampliar o debate em torno do processo de regulamentação e de incorporação de medicamentos órfãos para doenças raras no Brasil. O debate deve incluir as evidências relacionadas aos efeitos ­ benefícios e riscos ­ desses medicamentos, e maior clareza nos critérios para concessão de registro e recomendação de incorporação em sistemas de saúde. (AU).


Objective: to discuss the regulatory process of drugs for rare diseases in Brazil, based on the Zolgensma® case, and to critically evaluate the evidence so far available on the efficacy and safety of Zolgensma® for treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Methods: descriptive study conducted at the Health Technology Assessment Center of the Sírio Libanês Hospital (NATS-HSL) in June 2019. Results: in April 2019, the use of Zolgensma® for SMA was regulated in the United States based on two open-lable (unmasked), non-comparative (and therefore non-randomized) studies. These methodological limitations increase the uncertainty related to study results. The National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance (Anvisa) has approved strategies to regulate the process and specific deadlines for completing the appraisal process of new medicines for rare diseases, such as Zolgensma®. Conclusion: it is necessary to broaden the debate about the process of regulation and incorporation of orphan drugs for rare diseases in Brazil. This debate should include evidence related to the effects (benefits and risks) of these drugs, and greater transparency of the criteria indispensable for granting registration and recommendation of incorporation into health systems. (AU).


Objetivo: analizar el proceso de fármacos reguladores para enfermedades raras en Brasil, con base en el caso Zolgensma, y para evaluar críticamente la evidencia disponible hasta el momento sobre la eficacia y seguridad de Zolgensma® nel tratamiento de atrofia muscular espinal (AME). Métodos: estudio descriptivo realizado en el Centro de Evaluación de Tecnología de Salud del Hospital Sírio-Libanês (NATS-HSL) en junio de 2019. Resultados: en abril de 2019, el uso de Zolgensma® para la AME se reguló en los Estados Unidos basado en dos estudios abiertos (no enmascarados), no comparativos (y por lo tanto no aleatorios). Estas limitaciones metodológicas aumentan la incertidumbre en los resultados encontrados. La Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria en Brasil (Anvisa) ha aprobado estrategias para regular el proceso y los plazos de análisis de las solicitudes de registro de nuevos fármacos para enfermedades raras, el caso de Zolgensma. Conclusión: es necesario ampliar el debate sobre el proceso de regulación e incorporación de medicamentos huérfanos para enfermedades raras en Brasil. Este debate debe incluir evidencia relacionada con los efectos (beneficios y riesgos) de estos medicamentos y una mayor transparencia en los criterios para otorgar el registro y la recomendación de incorporación a los sistemas de salud. (AU).


Assuntos
Atrofia Muscular Espinal , Terapia Genética , Doenças Raras , Registro de Produtos , Medicamentos do Componente Especializado da Assistência Farmacêutica
7.
Diagn. tratamento ; 23(2): 61-65, abr.-jun. 2018. fig
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-904904

RESUMO

Introdução: As avaliações econômicas são importantes para quantificar e comparar custos e consequências das alternativas disponíveis em saúde. Objetivos: Descrever as características e a utilidade dos principais tipos de estudos de análises econômicas. Métodos: Estudo descritivo e de análise crítica realizado na Disciplina de Medicina Baseada em Evidências da Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). Resultados: Apresentamos características e exemplos dos principais tipos de análises econômicas em saúde, como análise de custo-utility, análise de custo-minimização, análise de custo-efetividade e análise de custo-benefício. Conclusão: Existem diferentes tipos de análise econômica, destinados a responder perguntas específicas, que precisam ser bem planejados e conduzidos para embasar a tomada de decisão de gestores e profissionais da saúde, tornando o processo mais explícito e objetivo.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Economia e Organizações de Saúde , Gestão em Saúde , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
8.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 66(10): 1773-7, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22012050

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct costs of hospital stays for premature newborns in the Interlagos Hospital and Maternity Center in São Paulo, Brazil and to assess the difference between the amount reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System and the real cost of care for each premature newborn. METHODS: A cost-estimate study in which hospital and professional costs were estimated for premature infants born at 22 to 36 weeks gestation during the calendar year of 2004 and surviving beyond one hour of age. Direct costs included hospital services, professional care, diagnoses and therapy, orthotics, prosthetics, special materials, and blood products. Costs were estimated using tables published by the Unified Health System and the Brasindice as well as the list of medical procedures provided by the Brazilian Classification of Medical Procedures. RESULTS: The average direct cost of care for initial hospitalization of a premature newborn in 2004 was $2,386 USD. Total hospital expenses and professional services for all premature infants in this hospital were $227,000 and $69,500 USD, respectively. The costs for diagnostic testing and blood products for all premature infants totaled $22,440 and $1,833 USD. The daily average cost of a premature newborn weighing less than 1,000 g was $115 USD, and the daily average cost of a premature newborn weighing more than 2,500 g was $89 USD. Amounts reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System corresponded to only 27.42% of the real cost of care. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of hospital stays for premature newborns was much greater than the amount reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System. The highest costs corresponded to newborns with lower birth weight. Hospital costs progressively and discretely decreased as the newborns' weight increased.


Assuntos
Tempo de Internação/economia , Nascimento Prematuro/economia , Peso ao Nascer , Brasil , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Clinics ; 66(10): 1773-1777, 2011. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-601912

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct costs of hospital stays for premature newborns in the Interlagos Hospital and Maternity Center in São Paulo, Brazil and to assess the difference between the amount reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System and the real cost of care for each premature newborn. METHODS: A cost-estimate study in which hospital and professional costs were estimated for premature infants born at 22 to 36 weeks gestation during the calendar year of 2004 and surviving beyond one hour of age. Direct costs included hospital services, professional care, diagnoses and therapy, orthotics, prosthetics, special materials, and blood products. Costs were estimated using tables published by the Unified Health System and the Brasindice as well as the list of medical procedures provided by the Brazilian Classification of Medical Procedures. RESULTS: The average direct cost of care for initial hospitalization of a premature newborn in 2004 was $2,386 USD. Total hospital expenses and professional services for all premature infants in this hospital were $227,000 and $69,500 USD, respectively. The costs for diagnostic testing and blood products for all premature infants totaled $22,440 and $1,833 USD. The daily average cost of a premature newborn weighing less than 1,000 g was $115 USD, and the daily average cost of a premature newborn weighing more than 2,500 g was $89 USD. Amounts reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System corresponded to only 27.42 percent of the real cost of care. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of hospital stays for premature newborns was much greater than the amount reimbursed to the hospital by the Unified Health System. The highest costs corresponded to newborns with lower birth weight. Hospital costs progressively and discretely decreased as the newborns' weight increased.


Assuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/economia , Nascimento Prematuro/economia , Peso ao Nascer , Brasil , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Fatores de Tempo
10.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 27(2): 125-31, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20339616

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the direct annual cost of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) treatment in Brazil's public and private health care systems, assess its economic impact on the total health care budget, and determine its proportion of the 2005 gross domestic product (GDP). METHODS: A decision tree model was used to determine direct costs based on estimated use of various resources in SAH diagnosis and care, including treatment (medication and non-medication), complementary exams, doctor visits, nutritional assessments, and emergency room visits. RESULTS: Estimated direct annual cost of SAH treatment was approximately US$ 398.9 million for the public health care system and US$ 272.7 million for the private system, representing 0.08% of the 2005 GDP (ranging from 0.05% to 0.16%). With total health care expenses comprising about 7.6% of Brazil's GDP, this cost represented 1.11% of overall health care costs (0.62% to 2.06%)-1.43% of total expenses for the Unified Healthcare System (Sistema Unico de Saúde, SUS) (0.79% to 2.75%) and 0.83% of expenses for the private health care system (0.47% to 1.48%). Conclusion. To guarantee public or private health care based on the principles of universality and equality, with limited available resources, efforts must be focused on educating the population on prevention and treatment compliance in diseases such as SAH that require significant health resources.


Assuntos
Hipertensão/economia , Hipertensão/terapia , Brasil , Custos e Análise de Custo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 27(2): 125-131, feb. 2010. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-542067

RESUMO

Objectives: To estimate the direct annual cost of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) treatment in Brazil's public and private health care systems, assess its economic impact on the total health care budget, and determine its proportion of the 2005 gross domestic product (GDP). Methods: A decision tree model was used to determine direct costs based on estimated use of various resources in SAH diagnosis and care, including treatment (medication and non-medication), complementary exams, doctor visits, nutritional assessments, and emergency room visits. Results: Estimated direct annual cost of SAH treatment was approximately US$ 398.9 million for the public health care system and US$ 272.7 million for the private system, representing 0.08 percent of the 2005 GDP (ranging from 0.05 percent to 0.16 percent). With total health care expenses comprising about 7.6 percent of Brazil's GDP, this cost represented 1.11 percent of overall health care costs (0.62 percent to 2.06 percent)-1.43 percent of total expenses for the Unified Healthcare System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) (0.79 percent to 2.75 percent) and 0.83 percent of expenses for the private health care system (0.47 percent to 1.48 percent). Conclusion. To guarantee public or private health care based on the principles of universality and equality, with limited available resources, efforts must be focused on educating the population on prevention and treatment compliance in diseases such as SAH that require significant health resources.


Objetivos: Estimar el costo directo anual del tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial sistémica (HAS) en los sistemas sanitarios público y privado de Brasil, evaluar su impacto económico en el presupuesto total de salud y determinar la proporción del producto interno bruto (PIB) que ocupó en 2005. Métodos: Se empleó un modelo de árbol de decisión para determinar los costos directos según el uso estimado de varios recursos en el diagnóstico y la atención de la HAS, incluidos el tratamiento (con medicamentos y sin ellos), los exámenes complementarios, las visitas del médico, las evaluaciones nutricionales y las visitas a servicios de emergencia. Resultados: El costo anual directo estimado del tratamiento de la HAS fue de aproximadamente US$ 398,9 millones en el sistema público y US$ 272,7 millones en el privado, lo que representó 0,08 por ciento del PIB en 2005 (mínimo: 0,05 por ciento; máximo: 0,16 por ciento). Con un gasto total en salud de cerca de 7,6 por ciento del PIB de Brasil, este costo representó 1,11 por ciento del costo total en salud (de 0,62 por ciento a 2,06 por ciento): 1,43 por ciento de los gastos totales del Sistema Único de Salud (de 0,79 por ciento a 2,75 por ciento) y 0,83 por ciento de los gastos del sistema privado (de 0,47 por ciento a 1,48 por ciento). Conclusiones: Para garantizar servicios públicos o privados de salud basados en los principios de universalidad y equidad, con recursos limitados, los esfuerzos se deben enfocar en educar a la población en el cumplimiento de las medidas de prevención y el tratamiento de enfermedades, que como la HAS, requieren considerables recursos sanitarios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Hipertensão/economia , Hipertensão/terapia , Brasil , Custos e Análise de Custo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA