Linking current dental education to gerontological education to meet the oral health needs of growing aging populations.

Objective: This study aimed to recognize the gaps in dental education by studying the current level of geriatric oral health training of recent graduated dentists who have been admitted into an Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) program. Methods: The AEGD program was developed along with the Age-Friendly 4Ms model to enhance current dental education. We adopted the Rapid Cycle Quality Improvement model to test the effectiveness of the training for AEGD residents from 2019 to 2022. A total of 18 residents participated (6 residents each year). A 5-question survey was administered before and after the rotation and Wilcoxon signed-rank with Fisher Exact tests were conducted to compare pre- and post- rotation results. Results: All 18 residents have completed pre- and post-program surveys. They self-reported minimal to no training in preparation to provide care to older adults with multiple chronic conditions. After the rotation, residents' confidence in treating older adults was significantly increased (p = 0.011). Meanwhile, residents gained knowledge to apply the 4Ms framework (what matters, medication, mentation, and mobility) to their practices (p = 0.015) and provide age-friendly care for older adults. Conclusion: The study identified and addressed the missing link in dental education to gerontological and geriatrics education. More clinical rotations and didactic training to equip residents with competences of providing geriatric oral health are strongly recommended.

Aging is not an Illness: Exploring Geriatricians' Resistance to Serious Illness Conversations.

CONTEXT: Serious illness conversations help clinicians align medical decisions with patients' goals, values, and priorities and are considered an essential component of shared decision-making. Yet geriatricians at our institution have expressed reluctance about the serious illness care program. OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore geriatricians' perspectives on serious illness conversations. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with interprofessional stakeholders in geriatrics. RESULTS: Three key themes emerged that help explain the reluctance of clinicians caring for older patients to have or document serious illness conversations: 1) aging in itself is not a serious illness; 2) geriatricians often focus on positive adaptation and social determinants of health and in this context, the label of "serious illness conversations" is perceived as limiting; and 3) because aging is not synonymous with illness, important goals-of-care conversations are not necessarily documented as serious illness conversations until an acute illness presents itself. CONCLUSION: As institutions work to create system-wide processes for documenting conversations about patients' goals and values, the unique communication preferences of older patients and geriatricians should be specifically considered.

Geriatric fracture program centering age-friendly care associated with lower length of stay and lower direct costs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with an integrated inpatient and outpatient program aimed at optimizing the care of geriatric fracture patients in a mixed community and academic health system setting. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: This study took place at a tertiary-care, 886-bed hospital system. The Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) was designed in 2018 using the 4Ms Framework (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility). Patients ≥65 years old with non-spine fractures managed by orthopedic faculty surgeons and participating hospitalist groups were included. A fracture liaison team educated patients regarding bone health and ensured ambulatory geriatrics follow-up. Outpatient geriatric visits focused on mobility, fall risk, bone health imaging, and medications. STUDY DESIGN: We compared GFP-enrolled patients (n = 746) to patients seen by non-GFP-participating physicians (n = 852) and used a generalized estimating equations approach and Poisson models to analyze associations between participation in the GFP program and four inpatient outcomes (time to surgery, length of stay, Vizient length of stay index, and total direct costs). We examined outcomes across all fractures and also stratified them by fracture type (hip vs. non-hip). We descriptively examined post-discharge care outcomes: fall, gait, and balance assessments; bone health imaging; and medications. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We collected data through chart reviews/electronic health record extracts from July 2018 to June 2021. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: GFP-enrolled patients with all fracture types had a significantly lower length of stay (marginal effect [ME]: -2.12, 95%CI: -2.61, -1.63), length of stay index (ME: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.42, -0.25), and total direct costs (ME: -$5316, 95%CI: -$6806, -$3826); the magnitude of the effects was greater for non-hip fractures. There was no significant difference in time to surgery. Of 746 GFP patients, 170 (23%) had a post-discharge visit with a participating geriatrician ≥6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to improving care for older adults with fractures improved length of stay and total direct costs.

Using the 4Ms framework to teach geriatric competencies in a community clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: As the population of older adults in the US steadily increases and becomes more diverse, there is an urgent need to integrate geriatric competencies into baccalaureate nursing education. PURPOSE: To integrate the Institute for Healthcare Improvement 4 Ms Framework into an existing baccalaureate nursing community clinical experience to build geriatric and interprofessional competencies and promote positive health outcomes. METHODS: As part of the Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program, 15 students worked with bilingual social workers and community health workers in an affordable housing urban highrise, assessed building residents and implemented personalized plans of care using the 4Ms framework (what matters to the individual, medications, mentation, and mobility). RESULTS: Students demonstrated competence conducting cognition and depression screening, medication review, and functional and fall risk assessments. Student self-rated achievement of learning objectives ranged from 4.3 to 4.8 (1-5 scale). A retrospective pretest-posttest survey suggested learning about the importance of interprofessional teamwork, and integration of person-centered values when providing care to older adults in the community. Students reflected on barriers to health for older adults in low socioeconomic states and the importance of improving care across the continuum. CONCLUSION: The 4Ms framework provided a valuable construct to guide the community experience and teach geriatric evidence-based practice to nursing students.

A retrospective/prospective on the future of geriatric nursing.

This paper will describe the exciting progress in geriatric nursing practice over the past 40 years and pay tribute to the leadership in the field, the progress in our programs of research and our commitment to ensuring our older patients get the reliable, high value, evidenced-based care they deserve. A brief synopsis of the literature related to the future of geriatric nursing and the field of geriatrics, describing themes from the literature in the context of the papers contained herein. Themes include: shortage of trained geriatric healthcare professionals, shortage of faculty, paucity of research funding, interdisciplinary care is required, meaningful use and integration of technology, lack of research funding and lack of interest in geriatrics as a specialty. The rapidly accelerating demand for geriatric nurse experts and care for older adults positions the nursing profession as principal agent in bridging care-gap needs for older persons, families, and their communities.