Correlation of Computed Tomography Angiography to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Stenosis with Real-World Assessment of Overestimation of Carotid Stenosis on Computed Tomography Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a well-established diagnostic modality for carotid stenosis. However, false-positive CTA results may expose patients to unnecessary procedural complications in cases where surgical intervention is not warranted. We aim to assess the correlation of CTA to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in carotid stenosis and characterize patients who were referred for intervention based on CTA and did not require it based on DSA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 186 patients who underwent carotid angioplasty and stenting following preprocedural CTA at our institution from April 2017 to December 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 186 patients (11.2%) were found to have <50% carotid stenosis on DSA (discordant group). Severe plaque calcification on CTA was associated with a discordant degree of stenosis on DSA (LR+=7.4). Among 186 patients, agreement between the percentage of stenosis from CTA and DSA was weak-moderate (r2=0.27, P<0.01). Among concordant pairs, we found moderate-strong agreement between CTA and DSA (adj r2=0.37) (P < 0.0001). Of 186 patients, 127 patients had CTA stenosis of ≥70%, and 59 had CTA of 50%-69%. Correlation between CTA and DSA in severe CTA stenosis was weak (r2=0.11, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stenosis found on CTA, over 88% also had stenosis on DSA, with this positive predictive value in line with previous studies. The percent-stenosis value from CTA and DSA was weakly correlated but does not affect the overall clinical judgement of stenosis. Severe calcification found on CTA may potentially indicate nonstenosis on DSA.

Why selective screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is currently appropriate: a special report.

INTRODUCTION: Two of the main reasons recent guidelines do not recommend routine population-wide screening programs for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) is that screening could lead to an increase of carotid revascularization procedures and that such mass screening programs may not be cost-effective. Nevertheless, selective screening for AsxCS could have several benefits. This article presents the rationale for such a program. AREAS COVERED: The benefits of selective screening for AsxCS include early recognition of AsxCS allowing timely initiation of preventive measures to reduce future myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac death and cardiovascular (CV) event rates. EXPERT OPINION: Mass screening programs for AsxCS are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Nevertheless, targeted screening of populations at high risk for AsxCS provides an opportunity to identify these individuals earlier rather than later and to initiate a number of lifestyle measures, risk factor modifications, and intensive medical therapy in order to prevent future strokes and CV events. For patients at 'higher risk of stroke' on best medical treatment, a prophylactic carotid intervention may be considered.

3-D Contrast-Enhanced Fusion Ultrasound for Accurate Volume Assessment of Vessel Lumen and Plaque in Carotid Artery Disease as Compared With Computed Tomography Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced fusion ultrasound (CEFUS) of atherosclerotic carotid arteries provides spatial visualization of the vessel lumen, creating a lumenography. As in 3-D computed tomography angiography (CTA), 3-D CEFUS outlines the contrast-filled lumen. Plaque and vessel contours are distinguished in 3-D CEFUS, allowing plaque volume quantification as a valid estimate of carotid plaque burden. Three-dimensional CEFUS is unproven in intermodality studies, vindicating the assessment of 3-D CEFUS applicability and comparing 3-D CEFUS and 3-D CTA lumenography as a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: Using an ultrasound system with magnetic tracking, a linear array transducer and SonoVue contrast agent, 3-D CEFUS acquisitions were generated by spatial stitching of serial 2-D images. From 3-D CEFUS and 3-D CTA imaging, the atherosclerotic carotid arteries were reconstructed with lumenography in an offline software program for lumen and plaque volume quantification. Bland-Altman analysis was used for inter-image modality agreement. RESULTS: The study included 39 carotid arteries. Mean lumen and plaque volume in 3-D CEFUS were 0.63 cm3 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.26) and 0.62 cm3 (SD: 0.26), respectively. Lumen volume differences between 3-D CEFUS and 3-D CTA were non-significant, with a mean difference of 0.01 cm3 (SD: 0.02, p = 0.26) and limits of agreement (LoA) range of ±0.11 cm3. Mean plaque volume difference was -0.12 cm3 (SD: 0.19, p = 0.006) with a LoA range of ±0.39 cm3. CONCLUSION: There was strong agreement in lumenography between 3-D CEFUS and 3-D CTA. The interimage modality difference in plaque volumes was substantial because of challenging vessel wall definition in 3-D CTA. Three-dimensional CEFUS is viable in quantifying carotid plaque volume burden and can potentially monitor plaque development over time.

Cerebral Blood Flow Patterns in Patients With Low-Flow Carotid Artery Stenosis, a 4D-PCMRI Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Compromised cerebral blood flow can contribute to future ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. However, there is limited knowledge of the effects on cerebral hemodynamics resulting from a reduced internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow rate (BFR). PURPOSE: Investigate how reduced ICA-BFR, relates to BFR in the cerebral arteries. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight patients, age 72 ± 6 years (11 female). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-Tesla, four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-PCMRI). ASSESSMENT: Patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were evaluated regarding the degree of stenosis. 4D-PCMRI was used to measure cerebral BFR in 38 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%). BFR in the cerebral arteries was assessed in two subgroups based on symptomatic ICA-BFR: reduced ICA-flow (<160 mL/minutes) and preserved ICA-flow (≥160 mL/minutes). BFR laterality was defined as a difference in the paired ipsilateral-contralateral arteries. STATISTICAL TESTS: Patients were grouped based on ICA-BFR (reduced vs. preserved). Statistical tests (independent sample t-test/paired t-test) were used to compare groups and hemispheres. Significance was determined at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The degree of stenosis was not significantly different, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 73%-87%) in the reduced ICA-flow vs. 72% (CI = 66%-76%) in the preserved ICA-flow; P = 0.09. In the reduced ICA-flow group, a significantly reduced BFR was found in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery and anterior cerebral artery (A1), while significantly increased in the contralateral A1. Retrograde BFR was found in the posterior communicating artery and ophthalmic artery. Significant BFR laterality was present in all paired arteries in the reduced ICA-flow group, contrasting the preserved ICA-flow group (P = 0.14-0.93). DATA CONCLUSIONS: 4D-PCMRI revealed compromised cerebral BFR due to carotid stenosis, not possible to detect by solely analyzing the degree of stenosis. In patients with reduced ICA-flow, collaterals were not sufficient to maintain symmetrical BFR distribution to the two hemispheres. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Comparative assessment of racial disparity in 30-day outcomes for Asian Americans undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective treatment for carotid stenosis. All previous studies on racial disparity of CEA outcomes omitted Asian Americans. This study aimed to address this gap by investigating racial disparities in 30-day outcomes following CEA among Asian Americans. METHODS: Asian American and Caucasian patients who underwent CEA were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2011 to 2021. Patients with age less than 18 years old were excluded. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis were examined separately. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was used to address preoperative differences. Thirty perioperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There were 380 Asian Americans (2.27%) and 13,250 Caucasians (79.18%) with symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent CEA. Also, 289 Asian Americans (1.40%) and 18,257 Caucasians (88.14%) with asymptomatic carotid stenosis had CEA. Asian Americans undergoing CEA presented with higher comorbid burdens and more severe symptomology. Also, asymptomatic Asian Americans were more likely to undergo surgeries for mild stenosis (<50%), which is not in line with practice guidelines. After 1:5 propensity-matching, all symptomatic Asian Americans were matched to 1550 Caucasian patients, and all asymptomatic Asian Americans were matched to 1445 Caucasians; preoperative differences were addressed. Asian Americans exhibited low overall 30-day mortality (symptomatic, 1.61%; asymptomatic, 0.35%) and stroke (symptomatic, 2.26%; asymptomatic, 0.69%). All perioperative outcomes were comparable to Caucasians, with the exception that Asian Americans experienced longer operation times. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggested that Asian Americans with asymptomatic stenosis were underrepresented in CEA. After propensity-score matching, Asian Americans demonstrated comparable 30-day outcomes to Caucasians. These suggest that, when afforded equal access to quality health care, CEA serves as an effective treatment for carotid stenosis among Asian Americans. Therefore, efforts may be aimed at addressing health care access, potentially in the screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in Asian Americans. This would ensure they have equitable benefits from CEA. Nevertheless, the exact preoperative differences and long-term CEA outcomes in Asian Americans should warrant further examination in future studies.

Cerebral vasomotor reactivity assessment using Transcranial Doppler and MRI with apnea test

Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests.