Endoscopic scoring system utilization for inflammatory bowel disease activity assessment: A multicenter real-world study from Argentina.

BACKGROUND: The frequency and patterns of use of scores for the assessment of endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease patients are not known. AIM: To describe the prevalence of adequate use of endoscopic scores in IBD patients who underwent colonoscopy in a real-life setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter observational study comprising six community hospitals in Argentina was undertaken. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who underwent colonoscopy for endoscopic activity assessment between 2018 and 2022 were included. Colonoscopy reports of included subjects were manually reviewed to determine the proportion of colonoscopies that included an endoscopic score report. We determined the proportion of colonoscopy reports that included all of the IBD colonoscopy report quality elements proposed by BRIDGe group. Endoscopist's specialty, years of experience as well as expertise in IBD were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1556 patients were included for analysis (31.94% patients with Crohn's disease). Mean age was 45.94±15.46. Endoscopic score reporting was found in 58.41% of colonoscopies. Most frequently used scores were Mayo endoscopic score (90.56%) and SES-CD (56.03%) for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In addition, 79.11% of endoscopic reports failed to comply with all recommendations on endoscopic reporting for inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of endoscopic reports of inflammatory bowel disease patients do not include the description of an endoscopic score to assess mucosal inflammatory activity in a real-world setting. This is also associated with a lack of compliance in recommended criteria for proper endoscopic reporting.

[Relationship of demographic and dietary hygiene factors with the pathology found in outpatient colonoscopies performed in a Castilla y León Health Service center]. / Relación de los factores demográficos e higiénico-dietéticos con la patología hallada en las colonoscopias ambulatorias realizadas en un centro del Servicio Castellano y Leonés de Salud.

Introduction: Background: colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent tumors in terms of incidence and mortality. Several elements, both inherited and environmental, have been related with its pathogenesis. Aims: to analyze the influence of age, gender and nutritional factors on the diagnosis of colonic polyps and CRC. Methods: a prospective, descriptive study over outpatients from the Health Area of León who took a colonoscopy between 09/09/2012 and 06/30/2013. Patients were asked to fill a semiquantitative food frecuency questionnaire with data such a sociodemographic, toxic and dietetic facts. Differences in diagnosis according to sociodemographic and hygiene-dietetic data were analyzed with a multivariate analysis by forward stepwise logistic regression. Results: data were collected from 1390 patients. Mean age was 57.88 (15.17) years and 47.8 % were male. CRC was diagnosed in 5 % of colonoscopies, and polyps in 20.4 %, with 9.4 % of them being HRA. Risk of polyps and HRA was higher in males (26.9 % vs 14.5 %) and (12.6 % vs 6.3 %), respectively (p < 0.001). Mean age was significantly higher in patients who presented polyps (56.51 (15.45) vs 63.22 (12.69) years; p < 0.001). Among the group who reported intake of smoked and salted food, the risk of polyps doubled (2.9 % vs 6.7 %, p = 0.002). In relation to alcohol intake we found that subjects with daily alcohol consumption showed a higher incidence of polyps whe compared to occasional drinkers and teetotallers (32 % vs 20 % vs 18.6 %, p = 0.002) Conclusions: age correlated with higher risk of polyps, HRA and CRC. Moreover, male gender also was associated with a high risk of polyps and HRA. Alcohol and red and processed meat intake increased polyp risk.

Introducción: Introducción: el cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es un tumor muy frecuente en términos de incidencia y mortalidad. Su patogenia se ha relacionado con diversos factores ambientales y hereditarios. Objetivos: analizar la asociación de edad, sexo y factores dietéticos con el diagnóstico de adenomas y CCR. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo prospectivo con los pacientes del Área Sanitaria de León que se sometieron a una colonoscopia ambulatoria entre 09/09/2012 y 30/06/2013. Mediante un formulario autoadministrado se recogieron datos sociodemográficos, tóxicos y dietéticos usando un cuestionario alimentario de frecuencia semicuantitativo. Se analizaron las diferencias en el diagnóstico según los datos sociodemográficos e higiénico-dietéticos, con análisis multivariante mediante regresión logística por pasos hacia delante. Resultados: se recogieron datos de 1390 pacientes cuya edad media fue de 57 (15) años; de ellos, el 47,8 % eran varones. Se diagnosticaron CCR en el 5 % de los pacientes y pólipos en el 20,4 % (9,4 % de adenomas de alto riesgo (AAR)). El hallazgo de pólipos y AAR fue más frecuente en los varones (26,9 % vs. 14,5 % y 12,6 % vs. 6,3 %, respectivamente (p < 0,001)). La edad media fue significativamente superior en los pacientes que presentaban pólipos (56.51 (15.45) vs. 63.22 (12.69) años; p < 0,001). En la población que refirió un consumo diario de carnes procesadas se duplicaba la proporción de pólipos detectados (2,9 % vs. 6,7 %; p = 0,02). Aquellos pacientes que consumían alcohol diariamente tenían mayor incidencia de pólipos frente al consumo ocasional y los abstemios (32 % vs. 20 % vs. 18,6 %; p = 0,002). Conclusiones: la edad se relacionaba con un mayor riesgo de pólipos, AAR y CCR. Los varones también tenían más riesgo de pólipos y AAR. El consumo de alcohol, carnes rojas y procesadas incrementaba el riesgo de pólipos.

Indicadores de desempeño de un programa de rastreo de cáncer colorrectal en la provincia del Neuquén, Argentina, 2015-2019 / Performance indicators of a colorectal cancer screening program in the province of Neuquén, Argentina, 2015-2019

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es una causa frecuente de mortalidad en adultos. El objetivo de este estudio fue mostrar resultados de la implementación del Programa de Rastreo de Cáncer Colorrectal (PRCCR) en la provincia del Neuquén, Argentina. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con análisis de resultados de sangre oculta en materia fecal (SOMF) y videocolonoscopía (VCC) en personas de 50-75 años, en efectores del sistema de salud pública en 2015-2019. Se determinó porcentaje de participación, resultados de SOMF, realización de colonoscopía en pacientes con SOMF positiva y sus hallazgos, y valor predictivo positivo (VPP) para detección de lesiones y de CCR. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 11 189 SOMF. La participación promedio fue 6,52% de la población objetivo. Tuvieron SOMF positiva el 24,6% de los participantes; de ellos, realizaron la VCC un 24%. Se encontró lesión significativa en el 24,8% (pólipos adenomatosos 21,9%, cáncer 2,9%), con un VPP para la detección de lesiones del 34,3%. Tuvieron adenomas avanzados el 7,4%. Repitieron la SOMF tras un resultado negativo (segunda o tercera ronda) el 17,6% de los pacientes, y realizaron una VCC de control tras el hallazgo de un pólipo adenomatoso el 13,7%. DISCUSIÓN: El PRCCR en Neuquén muestra algunos indicadores que deben mejorarse (cobertura, realización de VCC) y otros adecuados (frecuencia de lesiones). Ante las dificultades se pueden plantear medidas más focalizadas, como la aplicación de escalas de riesgo de CCR, rastreo bianual, etc.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of mortality among adults. The objective of this study was to show results of the implementation of the colorectal cancer screening program (CRCSP) in the province of Neuquén, Argentina. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, with analysis of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) results in people aged 50 to 75 years, in public hospitals between 2015- 2019. Participation rate, FOBT results, colonoscopy (CC) performance in patients with positive FOBT and their findings, and positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of lesions and CRC were determined. RESULTS: A total of 11,189 FOBT were requested. The average participation was 6.52% of the target population, 24.6% of the participants had positive FOBT, and 24% of them had a CC performed. A significant lesion was found in 24.8% (adenomatous polyps 21.9%, cancer 2.9%), with a PPV for the detection of lesions of 34.3%. Furthermore, 7.4% had advanced adenomas, 17.6% of the patients repeated the FOBT after a negative result (second or third round), and 13.7% had a control CC performed after the finding of an adenomatous polyp. DISCUSSION: The CRCSP in Neuquén shows some indicators that need to be improved (coverage, conduction of CC) and others that are adequate (frequency of findings). In view of these difficulties, some more focused screening measures can be considered, such as use of CRC risk scales, bi-annual screening, etc.

Assessment of Quality Indexes in Colonoscopy in the Coloproctology Service of a Tertiary Private Hospital in Southern Brazil / Avaliação de índices de qualidade em colonoscopia em um serviço de coloproctologia de um hospital terciário privado do Sul do Brasil

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer among men, and the second among women worldwide. In Brazil, the incidence andmortality of CRC continues to increase. In colonoscopies, adenoma detection rates (ADRs) higher than 25% are associated linearly with better outcomes and lower rates of interval cancer. Objective To assess the colonoscopy quality indexes. Methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective study in which anatomopathological data and data regarding the colonoscopies were collected from the patient records of Hospital Moinhos de Vento, in Southern Brazil. The exams were performed by doctors from the Colorectal Service from June to August 2015. Results A total of 430 exams were included. Most patients were women (60.9% [262]), with a mean age of 56.96 years. The cecal intubation rate was of 96.7% (416). The quality of the bowel preparation was excellent or good in 92.95% (396) of the cases. The average time of removal of the colonoscope in normal exams was of 6.15 minutes. Polyps were detected in 201 patients (46.7%), and adenomas, in 125 patients (29.1%); 12 patients (2.8%) had advanced adenomas, and 6 (2.3%) had malignant neoplasms. The proximal serrated lesion detection rate (PSLDR) was of 6.7% (29). The prevalence ratio (PR) of adenomas among men was 1.78 times greater than in women (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.16-2.75). The PR of adenomas among people aged 50 years or older was 2.41 times that of those under 50 years of age (95%CI: 1.43-4.06). Conclusion The data obtained are in line with international quality criteria in colonoscopy. More studies are needed to assess the ADR in the Brazilian population.

Resumo Introdução O câncer colorretal (CCR) é o terceiro mais comum em homens e o segundo mais comum em mulheres em todo o mundo. A incidência e mortalidade do CRC continuam a aumentar no Brasil. Taxas de detecção de adenoma superiores a 25% em colonoscopias estão associadas linearmente a melhores resultados emenores taxas de câncer de intervalo. Objetivo Avaliar a qualidade das colonoscopias analisadas. Métodos Este é um estudo transversal e retrospectivo no qual dados anatomopatológicos e relacionados às colonoscopias foram coletados de registros dos pacientes do Hospital Moinhos de Vento, no Sul do Brasil. Os exames foram realizados por médicos do Serviço de Coloproctologia de junho a agosto de 2015. Resultados Foram incluídos 430 exames. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino (60,9% [262]), com idade média de 56,96 anos. A taxa de intubação cecal foi de 96,7% (416). A qualidade do preparo intestinal foi excelente ou boaem92,95% (396) dos casos.O tempomédio de retirada do colonoscópio emexames normais foi de 6,15 minutos. Pólipos foram detectados em 201 pacientes (46,7%), e adenomas, em 125 (29.1%); 12 pacientes (2,8%) tinhamadenomas avançados, e 6 (2,3%), neoplasias malignas. A taxa de detecção de lesões serrilhadas foi de 6,7% (29). A razão prevalência (RP) de adenomas emhomens foi de 1,78 vezes emrelação amulheres (intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 1,16-2,75). A RP de adenomas entre pacientes com 50 anos ou mais foi 2,41 vezes maior do que a daqueles com mais de 50 anos (IC95%: 1,43-4,06). Conclusão Os dados obtidos estão de acordo com os critérios internacionais de qualidade em colonoscopia. Mais estudos são necessários para avaliar as taxas de detecção de adenoma na população brasileira.

Rastreo de cáncer colorrectal Análisis de resultados en la provincia de Neuquén, Argentina, 2015-2019 / Colorectal cancer screening: analysis of results in the Province of Neuquén, Argentina, 2015-2019

INTRODUCCIÓN: El Programa de Prevención de Tumores de la Provincia del Neuquén recomienda la Sangre Oculta en Materia Fecal Inmunológica (SOMFi) como intervención de rastreo, con posterior confirmación por videocolonoscopía (VCC) en pacientes con resultado positivo. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer los resultados de la utilización de SOMFi, la realización de VCC confirmatoria y sus hallazgos. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, que analizó los resultados de SOMFi obtenidos en personas de 50 a 75 años en todos los efectores del Sistema de Salud Pública de Neuquén en el período 2015-2019 sobre la base de registros informáticos provinciales y de cada centro de endoscopía. Se determinó la frecuencia de resultados de SOMFi, de VCC en los pacientes con SOMFi positiva y sus hallazgos. RESULTADOS: De 9909 muestras analizadas, 23,1% fueron positivas. Se realizó VCC confirmatoria en 24,1% de los pacientes con SOMFi positiva; presentaron cáncer el 3,7% de los casos, pólipos el 35% y estudio normal el 61,3%. Los tipos histológicos de los pólipos fueron: tubular (49%), hiperplásico (21,3%), tubulovelloso (20%), aserrado (7,2%) y otros tipos (2,5%). DISCUSIÓN: La frecuencia de SOMFi positiva fue mayor a la publicada. Solo el 20% de los pacientes realizó VCC confirmatoria. La frecuencia de cáncer y pólipos encontrados fue similar a la de otros estudios publicados. Debe incrementarse la realización de VCC confirmatoria.(AU)

INTRODUCTION: Neuquén Province Cancer Prevention Program recommends Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) as a screening intervention, with subsequent confirmation by video-colonoscopy (VCC) in patients with a positive result. The objective of the study was to know the results of the use of FIT, the performance of confirmatory VCC and its findings. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out. It analyzed the results of FIT in people aged 50-75 years, considering tests conducted in all agents of the Neuquén Public Health System in 2015- 2019 based on provincial computer records and data from each endoscopy center. The frequency of FIT results, VCC in patients with positive FIT and findings was determined. RESULTS: Of 9909 samples analyzed, 23.1% were positive. Confirmatory VCC was performed in 24.1% of the patients with positive FIT, with 3.7% having cancer, 35% with polyps and 61.3% of normal studies. The histological types of the polyps were tubular (49%), hyperplastic (21.3%), tubulovillous (20%), serrated (7.2%) and other types (2.5%). DISCUSSION: The frequency of positive FIT was higher than published. Only one in five patients with positive FIT underwent confirmatory VCC. The frequency of cancer and polyps was similar to the one found in other published studies. It is necessary to increase the number of confirmatory VCC.AU)

Assessment of tolerance and acceptability between mannitol solution and polyethylene glycol as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a three-center study / Evaluación de tolerancia y aceptabilidad entre la solución de manitol y el polietilenglicol como preparación intestinal para la colonoscopía: un estudio de tres centros

ABSTRACT Introduction: Adequate bowel preparation is one of the most important factors related to the yield of colonoscopy. Low quality bowel preparation has been associated with lower adenoma detection rates and increased healthcare expenses. Bowel preparation is a major impediment to undergo colonoscopy since it is perceived as an unpleasant experience by patients. Objective: This study was aimed to assess tolerance and acceptability of the bowel preparation using either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or mannitol solution. Materials and methods: We enrolled 140 patients with indications of screening for colorectal cancer or with suspected large bowel diseases. They received either mannitol solution or PEG as bowel preparation. Patients were asked to fill a questionnaire about the bowel preparation experience. Results: Patients perceived more burdensome the preparation with PEG than mannitol for the variables nausea overall experience, post-procedure discomfort, disagreeable flavor, volume ingested and cost (p<0.05). A similar tolerance was reported for abdominal pain, bloating and anal irritation (p>0.05). The acceptability was 82.9% and 71.4% in the Mannitol group and in the PEG group, respectively (p=0.10). Conclusion: Acceptance of the bowel preparation between mannitol solution and PEG was comparable. However, mannitol was better tolerated by the patients in regard to most of the evaluated items.

RESUMEN Introducción: La preparación intestinal adecuada es uno de los factores más importantes relacionados con el rendimiento de la colonoscopía. La preparación intestinal de baja calidad se ha asociado con tasas de detección de adenoma más bajas y mayores gastos de atención sanitaria. La preparación intestinal es un impedimento importante para someterse a una colonoscopía, ya que los pacientes la perciben como una experiencia desagradable. Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la tolerancia y la aceptabilidad de la preparación intestinal utilizando polietilenglicol (PEG) o solución de manitol. Materiales y métodos: Fueron incluidos 140 pacientes con indicación de pesquisa de cáncer colorrectal o con sospecha de enfermedades del intestino grueso. Los pacientes recibieron solución de manitol o PEG como preparación intestinal. Se pidió a los pacientes que completaran un cuestionario sobre la experiencia de preparación intestinal. Resultados: Los pacientes percibieron más agobiante la preparación con PEG que el manitol para las variables náuseas, experiencia general, molestias posteriores al procedimiento, sabor desagradable, volumen ingerido y costo (p<0,05). Se informó una tolerancia similar para el dolor abdominal, distensión abdominal e irritación anal (p>0,05). La aceptabilidad fue de 82,9% y 71,4% en el grupo de manitol y en el grupo de PEG, respectivamente (p=0,10). Conclusión: La aceptación de la preparación intestinal entre la solución de manitol y el PEG fue comparable. Sin embargo, el manitol fue mejor tolerado por los pacientes con respecto a la mayoría de las variables evaluadas.

Caracterización clínica y colonoscópica del adenocarcinoma colorrectal en un hospital peruano de la seguridad social / Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of colorectal adenocarcinoma in a Peruvian social security hospital

Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas y colonoscópicas de los pacientes con adenocarcinoma colorrectal. El estudio: Estudio observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, realizado en 88 pacientes con adenocarcinoma colorrectal, diagnosticados mediante colonoscopía realizada de enero del 2011 a diciembre del 2014. Hallazgos: 49 (55,5%) pacientes fueron mujeres; la edad promedio fue 68,2 años, 37 (42,0%) en el estadío II y 34 (38,6%) en el estadío III. El dolor abdominal (64,8%) fue el síntoma principal. En 40 (45,5%) de los pacientes la lesión se ubicó en el colon descendente y sigmoides. Conclusión: Los pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon son principalmente adultos mayores, mujeres, en estadío avanzado, siendo el síntoma más frecuente el dolor abdominal y cuya lesión se ubica-principalmente- en el colon descendente y sigmoides.

Safety degree assessment of drugs used in conscious sedation for colonoscopy in patients that develop respiratory depression / Avaliação do grau de segurança dos fármacos utilizados na sedação superficial na colonoscopia em pacientes que desencadeiam depressão respiratória

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the safety degree of drugs used in colonoscopy during conscious sedation in patients developing respiratory depression. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that evaluated 1120 patients who underwent colonoscopy between February 2015 and February 2016. Physical characteristics, surgical history and previous colonoscopies, indication and conditions of the current examination, fentanyl and midazolam doses and subsequent complications were analyzed. Level of significance: p < 0.05. Chi-square test was used for association of categorical variables, whereas Student's t test was used to compare means and Spearman's coefficient for correlation. Results: There were 661 female (59%) and 459 (41%) male patients, with a mean age of 54.90 (20-87) years and BMI of 27.00 (14.5-45.4). Of the 1120 patients, only 2 (0.2%) had respiratory depression, reversed with lanexat. Patients who had complications were of both genders, with a body mass index of 21.25 and 28.7. There was a correlation between the required dose of fentanyl and age (p < 0.001 to −0.121 Spearman's coefficient), as well as midazolam (p < 0.001 - Spearman's coefficient −0.452) and increasing age was associated with a lower dose of the drug. Conclusion: The number of patients with complications was 0.17%. The age of the patient showed an inverse association, i.e., the older the patient, the lower the required dose of medication. The drugs used in colonoscopy show a high degree of safety, corroborating their frequent use for superficial/conscious sedation in this procedure.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o grau de segurança dos fármacos utilizados na colonoscopia sob sedação superficial em pacientes que desencadeiam depressão respiratória. Métodos: Estudo observacional transversal, que avaliou 1.120 pacientes que realizaram colonoscopia entre Fevereiro de 2015 e Fevereiro de 2016. Analisaram-se características físicas, histórico cirúrgico e colonoscopias prévias, indicação e condições do exame atual, dose de fentanil e midazolam e complicações apresentadas. Nível de significância adotado: p < 0,05. Utilizou-se teste Qui-quadrado para associação de variáveis categóricas, teste t de Student para comparação de médias e coeficiente de Spearman para correlação. Resultados: Foram 661 pacientes do sexo feminino (59%) e 459 (41%) do sexo masculino, com média de idade de 54,90 (20-87) anos e IMC de 27,00 (14,5-45,4). Dos 1120 pacientes, apenas 2 (0,2%) exibiram depressão respiratória revertida com lanexate. Os pacientes que apresentaram complicação eram de sexos diferentes, com índices de massa corpórea de 21,25 e 28,7. Houve correlação entre a dose necessária de fentanil e a idade (p < 0,001 - coef Spearmann - 0.121), assim como a de midazolam (p < 0,001 - coef Spearmann - 0.452), sendo que com o aumento da idade se correlacionou com uma menor dose utilizada de medicamento. Conclusão: O número de pacientes que apresentaram alguma complicação foi 0,17%. A idade do paciente tem associação inversa, quanto maior a idade do paciente, menor é a dose necessária de medicamentos. Verifica-se alto grau de segurança dos medicamentos utilizados na colonoscopia, corroborando sua utilização frequente para a sedação superficial/consciente neste procedimento.

Sedation in colonoscopy by using three different propofol infusion methods and analysis of plasma concentration levels: a prospective comparative study / Sedação em colonoscopia: utilização do propofol em estudo comparativo entre três diferentes modos de administração

ABSTRACT Background: The propofolemia becomes directly linked to the clinical effects of this anesthetic and is the focus for studies comparing propofol clinical use, in different administration methods routinely used in endoscopy units where sedation is widely administered to patients. Aim: To evaluate the effects of three different regimens of intravenous propofol infusion in colonoscopies. Methods: A total of 50 patients that underwent colonoscopies were consecutively assigned to three groups: 1) intermittent bolus infusion; 2) continuous manually controlled infusion; 3) continuous automatic infusion. Patients were monitored with Bispectral IndexTM (BIS) and propofol serum levels were collected at three different timepoints. The development of an original dilution of propofol and an inventive capnography catheter were necessary. Results: Regarding clinical outcomes, statistical differences in agitation (higher in group 1, p=0.001) and initial blood pressure (p=0.008) were found. As for propofol serum levels, findings were similar in consumption per minute (p=0.748) and over time (p=0.830). In terms of cost analysis, group 1 cost was R$7.00 (approximately US$2,25); group2, R$17.50 (approximately US$5,64); and group 3, R$112.70 (approximately US$36,35, p<0.001). Capnography was able to predict 100% of the oxygen saturation drop (below 90%). Conclusion: The use of propofol bolus administration for colonoscopies, through continuous manually controlled infusion or automatic infusion are similar regarding propofolemia and the clinical outcomes evaluated. The use of an innovative capnography catheter is liable and low-cost solution for the early detection of airway obstruction.

RESUMO Racional: A propofolemia está diretamente relacionada com os efeitos clínicos desse anestésico e é foco de diversos estudos comparando os usos clínicos do propofol e os diferentes métodos de administração, como realizado amplamente nos centros de endoscopia. Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos de três diferentes regimes de infusão de propofol intravenoso em colonoscopias. Métodos: Ao todo 50 pacientes que foram submetidos à colonoscopia foram consecutivamente divididos em três grupos: 1) infusão em bolus intermitente; 2) perfusão contínua controlada manualmente; 3) infusão automática contínua. Os pacientes foram monitorados com Bispectral IndexTM (BIS) e os níveis séricos de propofol foram coletados em três momentos diferentes. Foi necessário a preparação de uma diluição específica de propofol e o desenvolvimento de um cateter de capnografia original manufaturado para a realização do estudo. Resultados: Em relação aos desfechos clínicos, houve diferença estatística na agitação (maior no grupo 1, p=0,001) e pressão arterial inicial (p=0,008). Com relação aos níveis séricos de propofol, os resultados foram semelhantes no consumo por minuto (p=0,748) e ao longo do tempo (p=0,830). Em termos de análise de custo, no grupo 1 o custo foi de R$ 7,00 (aproximadamente US$ 2,25); grupo 2, R$ 17,50 (aproximadamente US$ 5,64); e grupo 3, R$ 112,70 (cerca de US$ 36,35, p<0,001). A capnografia foi capaz de diagnosticar 100% das dessaturações de oxigênio (abaixo de 90%). Conclusão: O uso de propofol em bolus para colonoscopias, por meio de infusão contínua controlada manualmente ou infusão automática são semelhantes quanto à propofolemia e os resultados clínicos avaliados. Além disso, o uso de um cateter de capnografia inovador é solução de baixo custo para a detecção precoce da obstrução da via aérea.

Safety of mannitol use in bowel preparation: a prospective assessment of intestinal methane (CH4) levels during colonoscopy after mannitol and sodium phosphate (NaP) bowel cleansing / Segurança do uso do manitol no preparo para colonoscopia: avaliação prospectiva do nível de metano (CH4) intestinal durante colonoscopia após preparo com manitol e fosfato de sódio (NaP)

ABSTRACT Background - Adequate bowel preparation is critical for the quality of colonoscopy. Despite reported occurrence of colonic explosion due to methane and hydrogen production by bacterial fermentation during colonoscopy, gas exchange during the procedure is believed to be effective in lowering existing methane concentration, allowing for safe utilization of mannitol for bowel preparation. Thus, mannitol is widely used for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy, considering its low cost and effectiveness for bowel preparation. Objective - The aim of this study was to assess the safety of mannitol for bowel preparation, when compared to sodium phosphate (NaP). Methods - We conducted a prospective observational study in which 250 patients undergoing colonoscopy at Universidade Federal de São Paulo and Hospital Albert Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil) were approached for inclusion in the study. Patients received either mannitol (n=50) or NaP (n=200) for bowel preparation, based on physician indication. Study was conducted from August 2009 to December 2009. The main outcome of interest was presence of detectable levels of methane (CH4) during colonoscopy and reduction in such levels after gas exchange during the procedure. Methane concentrations were measured in three intestinal segments during scope introduction and withdrawal. Safety was assessed as the absence of high levels of methane, defined as 5%. Measurements were made using a multi-gas monitor (X-am 7000, Dräger Safety AG & Co. KGaA, Lübeck, Germany) connected to a plastic catheter introduced into the working channel of the colonoscope. Additional outcomes of interest included levels of O2. Methane and O2 levels are reported as ppm. Mean, difference and standard deviation of levels of gas measured in both moments were calculated and compared in both groups. Proportions of patients with detectable or high levels of methane in both groups were compared. Continuous variables were analyzed using t test and categorical variables using qui-square tests. The Ethics Committee in both study sites approved the study protocol. Results - Patients in both groups were similar regarding demographics, colonoscopy indication, ASA status and quality of bowel preparation. Seven (3.5%) patients in the NaP group had methane detected during introduction of the endoscope. Methane levels became undetectable during withdrawal of the scope. None of the patients in the mannitol group had detectable levels of methane. O2 levels did not differ in the groups. Conclusion - This is the largest study to assess the safety of mannitol for bowel preparation, considering methane measurements. Our results indicate that mannitol use is as safe as NaP, and gas exchange was efficient in reducing methane concentrations.

RESUMO Contexto - Preparo adequado é fundamental para garantia de boa qualidade em colonoscopia. Apesar de relatos de explosão do cólon durante colonoscopia, secundários à produção de metano e hidrogênio pela fermentação bacteriana, acredita-se que a troca gasosa durante o procedimento diminua a concentração existente de metano, permitindo a utilização com segurança, de manitol para o preparo de cólon. Assim, manitol é largamente utilizado para limpeza dos cólons antes da colonoscopia, especialmente devido ao seu baixo custo e eficácia. Objetivo - O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a segurança do uso de manitol no preparo dos cólons, quando comparado ao uso de fosfo-soda (NaP). Métodos - Este foi um estudo observacional retrospectivo no qual foram incluídos 250 pacientes submetidos a colonoscopia na Universidade Federal de São Paulo e Hospital Albert Einstein (São Paulo - Brasil). Os pacientes receberam preparo de cólon com manitol (n=50) ou NaP (n=200), de acordo com preferências dos médicos que encaminharam os pacientes. O estudo foi realizado entre agosto e dezembro de 2009. O principal resultado pesquisado foi a presença de níveis detectáveis de metano (CH4) durante a colonoscopia, e a redução nestes níveis após troca gasosa durante o procedimento. As concentrações de metano foram dosadas com detector multi-gas (X-am 7000, Dräger Safety AG & Co., KGaA, Lübeck, Alemanha) conectado a um cateter plástico que foi introduzido no canal de instrumentação do colonoscópio. Outro achado de interesse foram níveis de O2. Níveis de metano e O2 foram relatados em ppm. Média, diferença entre as médias e desvio padrão nos níveis dos gases em ambos momentos foram comparados nos dois grupos. A proporção de pacientes com níveis detectáveis ou altos de metano em ambos os grupos foram comparados. Variáveis contínuas foram analisadas com teste t e variáveis categóricas com o teste do qui-quadrado. Os Comitês de Ética de ambas instituições aprovaram o protocolo do estudo. Resultados - Pacientes nos dois grupos foram comparáveis quanto aos dados demográficos, indicação para colonoscopia, classificação ASA e qualidade do preparo do cólon. Sete (3,5%) pacientes no grupo NaP tinham níveis detectáveis de metano durante a introdução do colonoscópio. Os níveis de metano se tornaram indetectáveis durante a retirada do aparelho. Nenhum dos pacientes no grupo manitol tinha níveis detectáveis de metano. Níveis de O2 foram semelhantes nos dois grupos. Conclusão - Este é o estudo com maior casuística que avaliou a segurança do uso de manitol para preparo de cólon, no que diz respeito a dosagem de metano. Nossos resultados indicam que o emprego do manitol é tão seguro quanto o NaP, e que a troca gasosa é eficaz na redução da concentração de metano.

Colorectal cancer screening in the familial risk population: Is colonoscopy still the strategy of choice?

First-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk of this disease. For this reason, medical organizations and clinical guidelines recommend more intensive screening and surveillance for such first-degree relatives than for the average-risk population. Colonoscopy has been the cornerstone of CRC screening in this setting. Although colonoscopy is the most sensitive technique for the detection of neoplastic lesions (especially non-advanced adenomas), its role is less clear for CRC. In addition, screening colonoscopy has several limitations that may affect the success of a screening campaign, such as poor participant acceptance, the need for skilled endoscopists, participant access to screening colonoscopy, overburdened endoscopy units, potential complications, and procedure-related costs. In addition, recent evidence has cast doubt on the advantage of colonoscopy over other strategies for the detection of advanced neoplastic lesions. Despite being less sensitive in general, other screening methods frequently recommended in the average-risk population may be more acceptable and thus help increase CRC screening uptake. This review discusses recent evidence on the risk of CRC in first-degree relatives, the advantages and disadvantages of each screening technique, participation rates depending on the technique, patient preferences, and barriers to screening.

Estudo comparativo entre manitol e polietilenoglicol no preparo intestinal para colonoscopia / Manitol versus polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation for colonoscopy

OBJETIVOS: O estudo visa comparar o preparo intestinal para colonoscopia com manitol a 10 por cento, com o uso de polietilenoglicol (PEG). Levou-se em conta o custo de cada preparo, tolerabilidade, eficácia, e alterações bioquímicas causadas pela administração. MÉTODOS: Desenvolveu-se um ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, unicêntrico. Pacientes que já haviam feito o exame foram excluídos. Fez-se a dosagem de hematócrito, sódio, potássio e cloretos antes e depois do preparo. Escalas de sintomatologia e eficácia foram utilizadas. O custo foi calculado pelo volume médio necessário para obter-se evacuação com líquido claro sem resíduos. RESULTADOS: Foi necessário um litro a mais de solução de PEG para o preparo. Apesar disso, a tolerabilidade desta solução foi melhor. Na avaliação do colonoscopista sobre a qualidade do preparo, o manitol obteve vantagem. Não houveram alterações bioquímicas significativas, e o custo foi comparável. CONCLUSÃO: O manitol, apesar de parecer provocar mais sintomatologia nos pacientes, é mais eficaz na limpeza do cólon. Apesar de não ter seu uso endossado pelos últimos consensos internacionais, mostra-se seguro e eficaz. O PEG torna-se de custo vantajoso quando comprado pelo paciente, porém o manitol é mais barato em ambiente hospitalar.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to analyze bowel preparation for colonoscopy with mannitol compared to polyethylene glycol (PEG). Variables were the cost of preparation, patient acceptance, efficacy, and biochemical imbalances due to the use. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, unicentric clinical trial was designed. Patients already submitted to colonoscopies were excluded. Haematocrit, sodium, potassium, and chloride were evaluated before and after the administration. Symptom and efficacy scores were determined, and the cost was calculated by the average volume of solution necessary to produce a clear-liquid passage. RESULTS: It took one liter more of PEG solution to obtain an acceptable preparation. Yet, the compliance to that medication was better. The evaluation of quality by the endoscopist was superior in the mannitol group. Biochemical alterations were not significant, and a comparable cost was observed. CONCLUSION: Mannitol, despite causing more symptoms in patients, is more effective to clean the bowel lumen. Recent international consensus statements do not endorse the use of manitol, but it proves to be safe and efficient. PEG becomes cost-effective when bought over-the-counter by patients, but in hospital environment, mannitol is less expensive.

La radiología del colon por enema en el siglo XXI / Radiology of barium enema in the XXI century

Antecedentes: En los últimos años se ha introducido nuevos métodos para el estudio del colon. Objetivo: Analizar las distintas alternativas actuales para el diagnóstico de la patología colónica y el rol que el colon por enema (CxE) tiene en la actualidad, comparado con la videocolonoscopía (VCC), la colonoscopía virtual (CV) y la tomografía computada (TC). Material y métodos: Análisis de distintas series de la literatura que evalúan el papel de los diferentes métodos de estudio del colon. Resultados: Como estudio de catastro, la VCC y la CV fueron superiores en el diagnóstico de adenomas comparados con el CxE, que demostró una sensibilidad de alrededor del 50 por ciento según el tamaño de las lesiones con respecto a la VCC. Para pacientes sintomáticos, los resultados fueron similares. En pacientes ancianos, la TC mostró una sensibilidad comparable al CxE, no mostró el 2 por ciento de las lesiones radiológicas, sin las limitaciones de la preparación y la posibilidad de diagnóstico extracolónico. El CxE tiene utilidad en la colonoscopía incompleta pero compitiendo con la CV que tiene superior sensibilidad (50 contra 89 por ciento). Tiene mejor sensibilidad que la VCC en enfermedad diverticular (42 contra 18 casos), pero en patología asociada en colon sigmoideo, la sensibilidad es del 32 al 49 por ciento según el tamaño de las lesiones. La radiología aventaja a la VCC y CV en costo, siendo un 75 por ciento más económica. En series consultadas la indicación de CxE se ha reducido un 30 por ciento en los últimos 5 años. Conclusiones: El CxE tiene limitadas sus indicaciones en la actualidad y su utilización ha disminuido, siendo su futuro de indicación más restringida por el desarrollo y difusión de la VCC, el mejoramiento de la TC y el desarrollo de nuevos procedimientos como la CV.

Background: New methods to study the colon have been introduced in recent years. Objective: To assess current different alternatives to study colonic diseases, and the barium enema (BE) role compared to videocolonoscopy (VCO), virtual colonoscopy (VC), and computed tomography (CT). Material and methods: Analysis of different series of the bibliography that evaluate the various methods of colon study. Results: In the screening studies, the VCO and the VC were superior for the diagnosis of adenomas compared with BE which demostrated a sensitivity of around 50 per cent, according to polyp size, with respect to the VCO. For symptomatic patients, the results were similar. In elderly patients, the CT showed a comparable sensitivity with BE, did not show 2 per cent of the radiological injuries, but without the limitations of the preparation and the possibility of extracolonic diagnosis. BE is useful in incomplete colonoscopy, however, compete with VC, which has superior sensitivity (50 vs. 89 per cent). BE has better sensitivity than VCO in diverticular disease (42 vs. 18 cases), but in associated in sigmoid colon pathology, sensitivity is 32 to 49 per cent according to the size of the polyps. Radiology surpasses VCO and VC in cost, being 75 per cent less expensive. According to reviewed series, the indication of BE has been reduced by 30 per cent in the last 5 years. Conclusions: currently, BE has limited indications, which will be more restricted in the future due to the development and diffusion of VCO, the improvement of the CT and the development of new procedures, such as the VC.

Colonoscopia virtual / Virtual colonoscopy

Since the first report in 1994 virtual colonoscopy or CT colonography has had an explosive development due to the improvement in hardware and software. The multidetector CT has allowed faster studies with better images due to better multiplanar reconstructions and its speed avoiding the artifact of the breathing or bowel peristalsis. The new software has allowed to obtain better 3D images and faster reconstruction with shorter interpretation. This development, the use of standarized protocol plus the experience of trained radiologists have obtained sensitivity and specificity over 85% and 95% in polyps smaller and larger than 10 mm respectively. These results and the lower price of virtual colonoscopy in the United States compared with fibrocolonoscopy has done this technique a real alternative for the screening of colorectal cancer side by side with fibrocolonoscopy.

Desde la primera publicación sobre colonoscopía virtual o colonografía por tomografía computada (TC) esta técnica ha tenido un explosivo crecimiento especialmente dado por el desarrollo en el hardware, específicamente por la introducción de la TC multicorte que ha permitido obtener mejores imágenes gracias a la mayor velocidad que ha obviado los artefactos dados por el movimiento respiratorio y el peristaltismo intestinal. Otro factor importante en su desarrollo ha sido el gran avance en los programas computacionales (software) que han automatizado la técnica obteniendo recons-trucciones 3D de mejor calidad y en menor tiempo. El notable desarrollo tecnológico sumado a la estandarización de la técnica y la mayor experiencia lograda en diferentes centros ha hecho que en la actualidad la sensibilidad y especificidad de la colonografía sobrepasen el 85 y 95% para los pólipos menores y mayores de 1 cm, respectivamente. Todo esto, sumado a la estandarización de la técnica ha llevado a posicionarla como una alternativa válida y en estrecha competencia con la fibrocolonoscopía en la pesquisa de los pólipos de colon.